School of Public Health, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Deering Hall, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Reprod Health. 2018 May 2;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0515-6.
An increase in post abortion care (PAC) research with adolescents, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, has brought to attention several associated research ethics challenges. In order to better understand the ethics context of PAC research with adolescents, we conducted a scoping review of published literature.
Following a systematic search of PubMed, HINARI, and Google Scholar, we analysed articles meeting inclusion criteria to determine common themes across both the ethical challenges related to PAC research with adolescents and any available guidance on the identified challenges.
The literature search identified an initial 3321 records of which 14 were included in analysis following screening. Several ethical challenges stem from abortion being a controversial, sensitive, and stigmatized topic in many settings. Ethical dilemmas experienced by researchers conducting adolescent PAC research included: difficulties in convincing local health providers to permit PAC research; challenges in recruiting and seeking consent due to sensitivity of the subject; effectively protecting confidentiality; managing negative effects of interventions; creating a non-prejudicial atmosphere for research; managing emotional issues among adolescents; and dealing with uncertainty regarding the role of researchers when observing unethical health care practices. Suggested strategies for addressing some of these challenges include: using several sources to recruit study participants, using research to facilitate dialogue on abortion, briefing health workers on any observed unethical practices after data collection, fostering a comprehensive understanding of contextual norms and values, selecting staff with experience working with study populations, and avoiding collection of personal identifiers.
Addressing ethical challenges that researchers face when conducting PAC research with adolescents requires guidance at the individual, institutional, community, and international levels. Overall, despite the documentation of challenges in the published literature, guidance on handling several of these ethics challenges is sparse. We encourage further research to clarify the identified challenges and support the development of formal guidance in this area.
随着对青少年堕胎后护理(Post Abortion Care,PAC)研究的增加,尤其是在中低收入国家,人们开始关注与该研究相关的若干伦理挑战。为了更好地了解青少年 PAC 研究的伦理背景,我们对已发表的文献进行了范围综述。
我们在 PubMed、HINARI 和 Google Scholar 上进行了系统检索,对符合纳入标准的文章进行分析,以确定与青少年 PAC 研究相关的伦理挑战以及针对这些挑战的可用指导意见中的常见主题。
文献检索最初确定了 3321 条记录,经过筛选后有 14 条被纳入分析。在许多情况下,由于堕胎是一个有争议、敏感和耻辱化的话题,因此产生了若干伦理挑战。研究人员在进行青少年 PAC 研究时遇到的伦理困境包括:难以说服当地卫生提供者允许 PAC 研究;由于主题敏感,招募和寻求同意存在困难;有效保护机密性;管理干预措施的负面影响;营造一个非偏见的研究氛围;处理青少年的情绪问题;以及在观察不道德的医疗保健实践时,处理研究人员角色的不确定性。解决这些挑战的一些建议策略包括:使用多个来源招募研究参与者,利用研究促进对堕胎问题的对话,在数据收集后向卫生工作者通报任何观察到的不道德行为,促进对背景规范和价值观的全面理解,选择有经验与研究人群合作的工作人员,以及避免收集个人识别信息。
解决研究人员在对青少年进行 PAC 研究时面临的伦理挑战需要在个人、机构、社区和国际层面提供指导。总的来说,尽管已发表的文献中记录了挑战,但处理其中一些伦理挑战的指导意见很少。我们鼓励进一步的研究,以澄清已确定的挑战,并支持该领域正式指导意见的制定。