Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health, Kansai University of Welfare Sciences, 3-11-1 Asahigaoka, Kashiwara, Osaka, 582-0026, Japan.
An Visiting Nursing Station, 1-49-28 Kamikamida, Neyagawa, Osaka, 572-0052, Japan.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2022 Mar 7;41(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40101-022-00279-z.
The lumbar multifidus (LMF) muscle, which is involved in the mechanical stability of the lumbar spine, reportedly undergoes atrophy in patients with low back pain. Preventing or mitigating low back pain requires strengthening the LMF muscle; however, methods for triggering selective and significant contraction of this muscle have not been fully studied. This study aims to clarify how, in the hands-and-knees or standing position, the position of the arm and leg on one side affects the activity of the lumbar erector spinae (LES) and LMF muscles.
We recruited nine adult men with no prior history of low back pain. Measurements were taken in four different postures under varying conditions (that is, one arm and one leg were lifted in either the hands-and-knees or standing position,) as follows: (1) shoulder joint flexion and hip joint extension in the hands-and-knees position; (2) 90° shoulder joint abduction and hip joint abduction in the hands-and-knees position; (3) shoulder joint flexion and hip joint extension in the standing position; and (4) 90° shoulder joint abduction and hip joint abduction in the standing position. The 90° shoulder joint abduction involved simultaneous horizontal abduction, while the hip joint abduction involved simultaneous extension. Muscle activity of the LES and LMF in each posture was measured using a surface electromyograph.
Muscle activity of the LMF was significantly higher in 90° shoulder joint abduction and hip joint abduction than in shoulder joint flexion and hip joint extension in both the hands-and-knees and standing positions. The LES muscle showed no significant differences in activity between each posture.
The results suggest that unilateral 90° shoulder joint abduction and contralateral hip joint abduction in the hands-and-knees and standing positions may produce selective and significant contraction of the LMF muscle.
腰椎多裂肌(LMF)参与腰椎的机械稳定性,据报道,腰痛患者的 LMF 肌肉会发生萎缩。预防或减轻腰痛需要加强 LMF 肌肉;然而,尚未充分研究触发该肌肉选择性和显著收缩的方法。本研究旨在阐明在手足位或站立位时,一侧手臂和腿部的位置如何影响腰椎竖脊肌(LES)和 LMF 肌肉的活动。
我们招募了 9 名没有腰痛病史的成年男性。在不同条件下(即,一只手臂和一条腿在手足位或站立位抬起),在四种不同姿势下进行了测量:(1)手足位时,肩关节屈曲和髋关节伸展;(2)手足位时,肩关节外展 90°和髋关节外展;(3)站立位时,肩关节屈曲和髋关节伸展;(4)站立位时,肩关节外展 90°和髋关节外展。90°肩关节外展包括同时的水平外展,而髋关节外展包括同时的伸展。使用表面肌电图测量每个姿势下 LES 和 LMF 的肌肉活动。
在手足位和站立位时,90°肩关节外展和髋关节外展时 LMF 的肌肉活动明显高于肩关节屈曲和髋关节伸展时。LES 肌肉在每个姿势下的活动没有明显差异。
结果表明,手足位和站立位时,单侧 90°肩关节外展和对侧髋关节外展可能会产生 LMF 肌肉的选择性和显著收缩。