• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪扩散效应:公共组织发布的带有负面情绪的 COVID-19 推文会吸引更多的追随者做出回应。

Emotion diffusion effect: Negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets of public organizations attract more responses from followers.

机构信息

Center for Data and Decision Sciences, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0264794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264794. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264794
PMID:35259181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8903302/
Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has triggered an enormous number of discussion topics on social media Twitter. It has an impact on the global health system and citizen responses to the pandemic. Multiple responses (replies, favorites, and retweets) reflect the followers' attitudes and emotions towards these tweets. Twitter data such as these have inspired substantial research interest in sentiment and social trend analyses. To date, studies on Twitter data have focused on the associational relationships between variables in a population. There is a need for further discovery of causality, such as the influence of sentiment polarity of tweet response on further discussion topics. These topics often reflect the human perception of COVID-19. This study addresses this exact topic. It aims to develop a new method to unveil the causal relationships between the sentiment polarity and responses in social media data. We employed sentiment polarity, i.e., positive or negative sentiment, as the treatment variable in this quasi-experimental study. The data is the tweets posted by nine authoritative public organizations in four countries and the World Health Organization from December 1, 2019, to May 10, 2020. Employing the inverse probability weighting model, we identified the treatment effect of sentiment polarity on the multiple responses of tweets. The topics with negative sentiment polarity on COVID-19 attracted significantly more replies (69±49) and favorites (688±677) than the positive tweets. However, no significant difference in the number of retweets was found between the negative and positive tweets. This study contributes a new method for social media analysis. It generates new insight into the influence of sentiment polarity of tweets about COVID-19 on tweet responses.

摘要

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)在社交媒体 Twitter 上引发了大量讨论话题。它对全球卫生系统和公民对大流行的反应产生了影响。多个回复(回复、收藏和转发)反映了关注者对这些推文的态度和情绪。这些推文等 Twitter 数据激发了人们对情感和社会趋势分析的大量研究兴趣。迄今为止,对 Twitter 数据的研究主要集中在人群中变量之间的关联关系上。需要进一步发现因果关系,例如推文回复的情感极性对进一步讨论主题的影响。这些主题通常反映了人类对 COVID-19 的感知。本研究正是针对这一主题。它旨在开发一种新方法来揭示社交媒体数据中情感极性和回复之间的因果关系。我们将情感极性(即积极或消极的情感)作为本准实验研究中的处理变量。数据是来自 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 10 日期间九个权威公共组织和世界卫生组织在 Twitter 上发布的推文。我们采用逆概率加权模型,确定了情感极性对推文多个回复的处理效果。关于 COVID-19 的负面情感极性的主题吸引了更多的回复(69±49)和收藏(688±677),而正面推文则没有。然而,负面和正面推文之间的转发数量没有发现显著差异。本研究为社交媒体分析贡献了一种新方法。它深入了解了 COVID-19 推文的情感极性对推文回复的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/02df46cfb6ed/pone.0264794.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/0a957cc72aef/pone.0264794.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/04dc378baab0/pone.0264794.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/12ba47ef7376/pone.0264794.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/436632380ad8/pone.0264794.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/298331db16f0/pone.0264794.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/67d3aa70a728/pone.0264794.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/02df46cfb6ed/pone.0264794.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/0a957cc72aef/pone.0264794.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/04dc378baab0/pone.0264794.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/12ba47ef7376/pone.0264794.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/436632380ad8/pone.0264794.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/298331db16f0/pone.0264794.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/67d3aa70a728/pone.0264794.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8e8/8903302/02df46cfb6ed/pone.0264794.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotion diffusion effect: Negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets of public organizations attract more responses from followers.情绪扩散效应:公共组织发布的带有负面情绪的 COVID-19 推文会吸引更多的追随者做出回应。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0264794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264794. eCollection 2022.
2
Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study.新冠疫情期间推特用户的主要担忧:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e19016. doi: 10.2196/19016.
3
Topics and Sentiments of Public Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines: Social Media Trend Analysis.公众对新冠疫苗关注的话题和情绪:社交媒体趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 21;23(10):e30765. doi: 10.2196/30765.
4
Emotions and Topics Expressed on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Comparative Geolocation and Text Mining Analysis.在英国 COVID-19 大流行期间在 Twitter 上表达的情绪和主题:比较地理定位和文本挖掘分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e40323. doi: 10.2196/40323.
5
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
6
COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.新冠疫苗相关推文的讨论:主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 29;23(6):e24435. doi: 10.2196/24435.
7
Unveiling public perceptions at the beginning of lockdown: an application of structural topic modeling and sentiment analysis in the UK and India.揭示封锁初期的公众看法:英国和印度的结构主题建模和情感分析应用。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2832. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20160-1.
8
COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.疫苗接种后关于 COVID-19 疫苗的推文:基于情感的主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 8;24(2):e31726. doi: 10.2196/31726.
9
Using Natural Language Processing to Explore Social Media Opinions on Food Security: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.使用自然语言处理技术探索社交媒体对食品安全的看法:情感分析和主题建模研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 21;26:e47826. doi: 10.2196/47826.
10
Emergency Physician Twitter Use in the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Potential Predictor of Impending Surge: Retrospective Observational Study.《COVID-19 大流行期间急诊医师在 Twitter 上的使用情况可能预示着即将出现的疫情高峰:回顾性观察研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 14;23(7):e28615. doi: 10.2196/28615.

引用本文的文献

1
Social media crisis communication and public engagement during COVID-19 analyzing public health and news media organizations' tweeting strategies.新冠疫情期间的社交媒体危机沟通与公众参与:分析公共卫生和新闻媒体组织的推文策略
Sci Rep. 2025 May 24;15(1):18082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90759-w.
2
Analyzing Patient Experience on Weibo: Machine Learning Approach to Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.分析微博上的患者体验:基于机器学习的主题建模和情感分析方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 29;12:e59249. doi: 10.2196/59249.
3
Whose tweets about obesity and weight loss gain the most attention: celebrities, political, or medical authorities?

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Polarity and Emotion Detection Using Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning on COVID-19 Related Tweets.基于情感分析和深度学习对新冠疫情相关推文进行跨文化极性与情感检测
IEEE Access. 2020 Sep 28;8:181074-181090. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027350. eCollection 2020.
2
Texas Public Agencies' Tweets and Public Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Natural Language Processing Approach.德克萨斯州公共机构在 COVID-19 大流行期间的推文和公众参与:自然语言处理方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 26;7(4):e26720. doi: 10.2196/26720.
3
Causal Effect of Honorary Titles on Physicians' Service Volumes in Online Health Communities: Retrospective Study.
关于肥胖和减肥的推文,哪些人最受关注:名人、政治人物还是医学权威?
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Apr;49(4):673-681. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01689-y. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Infertility Posts on X: Insights on a Misinformation Pandemic.X 上的 COVID-19 疫苗信息和不孕不育帖子:对错误信息大流行的洞察。
Perm J. 2024 Jun 14;28(2):47-54. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.142. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Modeling emotional contagion in the COVID-19 pandemic: a complex network approach.新冠疫情中情绪感染的建模:一种复杂网络方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Nov 20;9:e1693. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1693. eCollection 2023.
6
Mapping obesity and diabetes' representation on Twitter: the case of Italy.在推特上描绘肥胖症和糖尿病的情况:以意大利为例。
Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 15;8:1155849. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1155849. eCollection 2023.
7
Stratified Simple Random Sampling Versus Volunteer Community-Wide Sampling for Estimates of COVID-19 Prevalence.分层简单随机抽样与志愿者社区广泛抽样对 COVID-19 患病率估计的比较。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Jul;113(7):768-777. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307303. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Socio-demographic differences in access to psychological treatment services: evidence from a national cohort study.社会人口统计学差异对获得心理治疗服务的影响:来自全国队列研究的证据。
Psychol Med. 2023 Nov;53(15):7395-7406. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001010. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
A Study of Factors Influencing the Volume of Responses to Posts in Physician Online Community.一项关于影响医生在线社区帖子回复量的因素的研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;11(9):1275. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091275.
10
Balanced Reporting and Boomerang Effect: An Analysis of Croatian Online News Sites Vaccination Coverage and User Comments during the COVID-19 Pandemic.平衡报道与回旋镖效应:对克罗地亚在线新闻网站在新冠疫情期间疫苗接种覆盖率及用户评论的分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 6;10(12):2085. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122085.
荣誉称号对在线健康社区医生服务量的因果效应:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 9;22(7):e18527. doi: 10.2196/18527.
4
Not all world leaders use Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: impact of the way of Angela Merkel on psychological distress, behaviour and risk perception.并非所有世界领导人都在推特上回应 COVID-19 大流行:安格拉·默克尔的应对方式对心理困扰、行为和风险认知的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):644-646. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa060.
5
Association of Public Health Interventions With the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Wuhan, China.公共卫生干预措施与中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情流行病学的关联。
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1915-1923. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6130.
6
Identification of the Differential Effect of City-Level on the Gini Coefficient of Health Service Delivery in Online Health Community.识别城市层面在在线健康社区卫生服务提供基尼系数上的差异效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13):2314. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132314.
7
Using Twitter to Detect Psychological Characteristics of Self-Identified Persons With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Feasibility Study.利用推特(Twitter)检测自认为患有自闭症谱系障碍者的心理特征:一项可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 12;7(2):e12264. doi: 10.2196/12264.
8
Sentiment Analysis of Health Care Tweets: Review of the Methods Used.医疗保健推文的情感分析:所用方法综述
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Apr 23;4(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5789.
9
Primed for death: Law enforcement-citizen homicides, social media, and retaliatory violence.准备赴死:执法人员与公民之间的杀人事件、社交媒体及报复性暴力
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190571. eCollection 2018.
10
Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians' Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study.理解在线医疗社区中奖励与医生贡献之间的非线性因果关系:纵向研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 21;19(12):e427. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9082.