Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9.
After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed.
Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated.
During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries.
In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments.
在急诊科(ED)进行临床评估后,面部烧伤患者通常需要插管以保护气道。然而,存在不必要的插管或入院后插管延迟的可能性。需要有评估面部烧伤患者吸入性损伤和气道保护需求的客观标准。
回顾了 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 5 月期间的面部烧伤患者。比较了 ED 中插管和未插管的患者。所有插管患者均接受常规支气管镜检查和实验室检查,以评估是否存在吸入性损伤。比较了有和无确认吸入性损伤的患者。采用多变量 logistic 回归分析确定面部烧伤患者吸入性损伤的独立危险因素。还调查了无吸入性损伤患者插管的原因。
在研究期间,335 例面部烧伤患者中共有 121 例在 ED 中插管。仅 73 例(60.3%)患者后来在支气管镜检查中被证实有吸入性损伤。有和无吸入性损伤的患者比较显示,呼吸急促(比值比=3.376,p=0.027)和高总体表面积(TBSA)(比值比=1.038,p=0.001)是吸入性损伤的独立危险因素。其他体征(如声音嘶哑、烧焦的鼻毛等)、实验室检查和胸部 X 线检查结果均不能预测面部烧伤患者的吸入性损伤。所有 TBSA 超过 60%的患者即使没有吸入性损伤也在 ED 中插管。
在面部烧伤患者的管理中,常规体格检查的阳性体征并不总是能预测 ED 中的吸入性损伤和需要气管插管。应更加关注呼吸急促和 TBSA 高的面部烧伤患者。由于相关损伤和治疗,即使无吸入性损伤,也需要对面部烧伤患者进行气道保护。