Suppr超能文献

一项评估刚果民主共和国埃博拉病毒病两剂异源疫苗有效性和安全性的 3 期临床试验方案。

Protocol for a phase 3 trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a heterologous, two-dose vaccine for Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, Mwanza, Tanzania, United Republic of.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e055596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055596.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ebola virus disease (EVD) continues to be a significant public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Large-scale vaccination during outbreaks may reduce virus transmission. We established a large population-based clinical trial of a heterologous, two-dose prophylactic vaccine during an outbreak in eastern DRC to determine vaccine effectiveness.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This open-label, non-randomised, population-based trial enrolled eligible adults and children aged 1 year and above. Participants were offered the two-dose candidate EVD vaccine regimen VAC52150 (Ad26.ZEBOV, Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA)-BN-Filo), with the doses being given 56 days apart. After vaccination, serious adverse events (SAEs) were passively recorded until 1 month post dose 2. 1000 safety subset participants were telephoned at 1 month post dose 2 to collect SAEs. 500 pregnancy subset participants were contacted to collect SAEs at D7 and D21 post dose 1 and at D7, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post dose 2, unless delivery was before these time points. The first 100 infants born to these women were given a clinical examination 3 months post delivery. Due to COVID-19 and temporary suspension of dose 2 vaccinations, at least 50 paediatric and 50 adult participants were enrolled into an immunogenicity subset to examine immune responses following a delayed second dose. Samples collected predose 2 and at 21 days post dose 2 will be tested using the Ebola viruses glycoprotein Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group ELISA. For qualitative research, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were being conducted with participants or parents/care providers of paediatric participants.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by Comité National d'Ethique et de la Santé du Ministère de la santé de RDC, Comité d'Ethique de l'Ecole de Santé Publique de l'Université de Kinshasa, the LSHTM Ethics Committee and the MSF Ethics Review Board. Findings will be presented to stakeholders and conferences. Study data will be made available for open access.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04152486.

摘要

简介

埃博拉病毒病(EVD)仍然是撒哈拉以南非洲地区的一个重大公共卫生问题,特别是在刚果民主共和国(DRC)。在疫情爆发期间进行大规模疫苗接种可能会降低病毒传播。我们在刚果民主共和国东部的疫情中建立了一项针对异源、两剂预防性疫苗的大型基于人群的临床试验,以确定疫苗的有效性。

方法和分析

这项开放标签、非随机、基于人群的试验招募了符合条件的 1 岁及以上的成年人和儿童。参与者被提供两剂候选 EVD 疫苗 VAC52150(Ad26.ZEBOV、改良痘苗病毒 Ankara(MVA)-BN-Filo),两次剂量相隔 56 天。接种疫苗后,直到第 2 剂后 1 个月,被动记录严重不良事件(SAE)。在第 2 剂后 1 个月,对 1000 名安全性亚组参与者进行电话随访,以收集 SAE。在第 1 剂后 7 天和第 21 天以及第 1 剂后 7 天、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月,对 500 名妊娠亚组参与者进行电话随访,以收集 SAE,除非在这些时间点之前分娩。这些女性所生的前 100 名婴儿在分娩后 3 个月进行临床检查。由于 COVID-19 和第 2 剂疫苗接种的暂时暂停,至少有 50 名儿科和 50 名成人参与者被纳入免疫亚组,以检查延迟第二剂后的免疫反应。在接种第 2 剂前和接种第 2 剂后 21 天采集的样本将使用埃博拉病毒糖蛋白丝状病毒动物非临床组 ELISA 进行检测。对于定性研究,正在对参与者或儿科参与者的父母/照顾者进行深入访谈和焦点小组讨论。

伦理和传播

得到刚果民主共和国卫生部国家伦理和健康委员会、金沙萨公共卫生学校伦理委员会、LSHTM 伦理委员会和无国界医生伦理审查委员会的批准。研究结果将提交给利益相关者和会议。研究数据将可供开放获取。

试验注册编号

NCT04152486。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Test-Negative Designs with Multiple Testing Sources.具有多个测试源的阴性测试设计。
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 29:rs.3.rs-6548614. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6548614/v1.
2
Test-Negative Designs with Multiple Testing Sources.具有多个测试源的阴性测试设计。
medRxiv. 2025 Apr 28:2025.04.26.25326477. doi: 10.1101/2025.04.26.25326477.

本文引用的文献

4
Bat-borne virus diversity, spillover and emergence.蝙蝠携带病毒的多样性、溢出和出现。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020 Aug;18(8):461-471. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0394-z. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
5
Ebola virus disease.埃博拉病毒病。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Feb 20;6(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0147-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验