Orthopaedics, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 8;12(3):e060000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060000.
More than 1 million elective total hip and knee replacements are performed annually in the USA with 2% risk of clinical pulmonary embolism (PE), 0.1%-0.5% fatal PE, and over 1000 deaths. Antithrombotic prophylaxis is standard of care but evidence is limited and conflicting. We will compare effectiveness of three commonly used chemoprophylaxis agents to prevent all-cause mortality (ACM) and clinical venous thromboembolism (VTE) while avoiding bleeding complications.
Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after HiP and KneE Replacement is a large randomised pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial with non-inferiority design and target enrolment of 20 000 patients comparing aspirin (81 mg two times a day), low-intensity warfarin (INR (International Normalized Ratio) target 1.7-2.2) and rivaroxaban (10 mg/day). The primary effectiveness outcome is aggregate of VTE and ACM, primary safety outcome is clinical bleeding complications, and patient-reported outcomes are determined at 1, 3 and 6 months. Primary data analysis is , as preferred for non-inferiority trials, with secondary analyses adherent to principles. All non-fatal outcomes are captured from patient and clinical reports with independent blinded adjudication. Study design and oversight are by a multidisciplinary stakeholder team including a 10-patient advisory board.
The Institutional Review Board of the Medical University of South Carolina provides central regulatory oversight. Patients aged 21 or older undergoing primary or revision hip or knee replacement are block randomised by site and procedure; those on chronic anticoagulation are excluded. Recruitment commenced at 30 North American centres in December 2016. Enrolment currently exceeds 13 500 patients, representing 33% of those eligible at participating sites, and is projected to conclude in July 2024; COVID-19 may force an extension. Results will inform antithrombotic choice by patients and other stakeholders for various risk cohorts, and will be disseminated through academic publications, meeting presentations and communications to advocacy groups and patient participants.
NCT02810704.
在美国,每年有超过 100 万例择期全髋关节和全膝关节置换术,临床肺栓塞(PE)的风险为 2%,致死性 PE 为 0.1%-0.5%,超过 1000 人死亡。抗血栓预防是标准的治疗方法,但证据有限且存在冲突。我们将比较三种常用的化学预防药物在预防全因死亡率(ACM)和临床静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的同时避免出血并发症的有效性。
髋关节和膝关节置换术后肺栓塞预防是一项大型随机实用比较有效性试验,采用非劣效性设计,目标入组 20000 例患者,比较阿司匹林(81mg 每天两次)、低强度华法林(INR(国际标准化比值)目标 1.7-2.2)和利伐沙班(10mg/天)。主要有效性结局是 VTE 和 ACM 的综合,主要安全性结局是临床出血并发症,患者报告的结果在 1、3 和 6 个月时确定。主要数据分析是首选的非劣效性试验,其次是符合原则的二次分析。所有非致命性结局均从患者和临床报告中捕获,并进行独立盲法裁决。研究设计和监督由包括 10 名患者顾问委员会在内的多学科利益相关者团队进行。
南卡罗来纳医科大学的机构审查委员会提供中央监管监督。年龄在 21 岁或以上、接受初次或翻修髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者按地点和程序进行块随机分组;正在接受慢性抗凝治疗的患者被排除在外。招募于 2016 年 12 月在 30 个北美中心开始。目前入组人数超过 13500 人,占参与地点合格人数的 33%,预计将于 2024 年 7 月结束;COVID-19 可能会导致延长。结果将为不同风险队列的患者和其他利益相关者提供抗血栓药物选择的信息,并通过学术出版物、会议演讲以及与倡导团体和患者参与者的沟通进行传播。
NCT02810704。