• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医院的电子病历(EMR)的经济评估与分析:国际文献的范围综述

Economic evaluation and analyses of hospital-based electronic medical records (EMRs): a scoping review of international literature.

作者信息

Nguyen Kim-Huong, Wright Chad, Simpson Digby, Woods Leanna, Comans Tracy, Sullivan Clair

机构信息

Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 8;5(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00565-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-022-00565-1
PMID:35260765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8904550/
Abstract

Digital transformation is expensive and rarely smooth, often leading to higher costs than anticipated. It is challenging to demonstrate the contribution of digital health investment in achieving the healthcare aims of population health and workforce sustainability. We conducted a scoping review to understand how electronic medical record (EMR) implementations in the hospital setting have been evaluated using cost-benefit analysis (CBA) approaches. The review search resulted in 1184 unique articles, a final list of 28 was collated of which 20 were US-based studies. All studies were published in 2010-2019, with fewer studies published in more recent years. The data used to estimate benefits and costs were dated from 1996 to 2016, with most data from 2000 to 2010. Only three studies were qualified as using cost-benefit analysis approaches. While studies indicated that there is a positive impact from the EMR implementation, the impacts measured varied greatly. We concluded that the current literature demonstrates a lack of appropriate and comprehensive economic frameworks to understand the value of digital hospital implementations. Additionally, most studies failed to align fully to the quadruple aims of healthcare: they focused either on cost savings and/or improved patient outcomes and population health, none investigated healthcare-workforce sustainability.

摘要

数字化转型成本高昂且鲜有顺利的情况,往往导致成本高于预期。要证明数字健康投资对实现人群健康和劳动力可持续性等医疗保健目标的贡献具有挑战性。我们进行了一项范围审查,以了解在医院环境中电子病历(EMR)实施情况是如何使用成本效益分析(CBA)方法进行评估的。审查搜索得到1184篇独特文章,最终整理出28篇文章的清单,其中20篇是美国的研究。所有研究均发表于2010年至2019年,近年来发表的研究较少。用于估计效益和成本的数据可追溯到1996年至2016年,大部分数据来自2000年至2010年。只有三项研究符合使用成本效益分析方法的标准。虽然研究表明电子病历实施有积极影响,但所衡量的影响差异很大。我们得出结论,当前文献表明缺乏适当和全面的经济框架来理解数字医院实施的价值。此外,大多数研究未能完全符合医疗保健的四重目标:它们要么侧重于成本节约和/或改善患者结局及人群健康,没有一项研究调查医疗保健劳动力的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/eb543fb37fcb/41746_2022_565_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/c96f53e8ca5f/41746_2022_565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/62020a1a82c1/41746_2022_565_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/eb543fb37fcb/41746_2022_565_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/c96f53e8ca5f/41746_2022_565_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/62020a1a82c1/41746_2022_565_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6240/8904550/eb543fb37fcb/41746_2022_565_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation and analyses of hospital-based electronic medical records (EMRs): a scoping review of international literature.基于医院的电子病历(EMR)的经济评估与分析:国际文献的范围综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 8;5(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00565-1.
2
Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals.变现:数字医院的成本效益分析框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 31;24(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11132-7.
3
Implementation of Electronic Medical Records in Mental Health Settings: Scoping Review.精神卫生环境中电子病历的实施:范围审查
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Sep 7;8(9):e30564. doi: 10.2196/30564.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.吸烟及降低吸烟率的经济影响:证据综述
Tob Use Insights. 2015 Jul 14;8:1-35. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S15628. eCollection 2015.
6
The impact of electronic medical records on maternal healthcare: A scoping review.电子病历对孕产妇保健的影响:一项范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Aug;200:105929. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105929. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
7
Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.走向数字化:医院全面实施电子病历及数字化转型的准备清单。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):302-313. doi: 10.1071/AH17153.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying PEST analysis to evaluate the adoption of electronic health records in Tanzanian healthcare: A scoping review.应用PEST分析评估坦桑尼亚医疗保健领域电子健康记录的采用情况:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 21;11:20552076251334029. doi: 10.1177/20552076251334029. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Nurses' continuance intention to use electronic health record systems: The antecedent role of personality and organisation support.护士继续使用电子健康记录系统的意愿:人格和组织支持的先行作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0300657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300657. eCollection 2024.
3
Digital Maturity as a Predictor of Quality and Safety Outcomes in US Hospitals: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: a systematic review.影响初级保健医生成熟使用电子病历的因素:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Feb 19;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01434-9.
2
Patient Portals Facilitating Engagement With Inpatient Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review.促进住院电子病历参与度的患者门户:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779. doi: 10.2196/12779.
3
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
数字成熟度对美国医院质量和安全结果的预测作用:横断面观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 6;26:e56316. doi: 10.2196/56316.
4
Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals.变现:数字医院的成本效益分析框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 31;24(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11132-7.
5
The Impact of Digital Hospitals on Patient and Clinician Experience: Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.数字医院对患者和临床医生体验的影响:系统评价和定性证据综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 11;26:e47715. doi: 10.2196/47715.
6
Perceived Impact of Digital Health Maturity on Patient Experience, Population Health, Health Care Costs, and Provider Experience: Mixed Methods Case Study.数字健康成熟度对患者体验、人群健康、医疗成本和提供者体验的感知影响:混合方法案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 18;25:e45868. doi: 10.2196/45868.
7
Opportunities and Challenges to Advance Health Equity Using Digital Health Tools in Underserved Communities in Southeast US: A Mixed Methods Study.利用数字健康工具在美东南服务欠缺社区促进健康公平的机遇与挑战:一项混合方法研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231184789. doi: 10.1177/21501319231184789.
8
Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.评估医院中计算机化临床决策支持系统的成本和后果:范围综述及对未来实践的建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 May 19;30(6):1205-1218. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad040.
9
Digital solutions for primary stroke and cardiovascular disease prevention: A mass individual and public health approach.原发性中风和心血管疾病预防的数字解决方案:一种针对大众个体和公共卫生的方法。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Jun 30;29:100511. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100511. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Show me the money: how do we justify spending health care dollars on digital health?钱花得值吗:我们如何证明将医疗保健资金投入数字健康领域是合理的?
Med J Aust. 2023 Feb 6;218(2):53-57. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51799. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
4
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.电子病历系统同化中的天花板效应:基层医疗家庭诊所的多案例研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0445-1.
6
Progress in the Enhanced Use of Electronic Medical Records: Data From the Ontario Experience.电子病历强化应用的进展:来自安大略省的经验数据
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Feb 22;5(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6928.
7
From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider.从三重目标到四重目标:照顾患者需要照顾医疗服务提供者。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):573-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1713.
8
Measuring value for money: a scoping review on economic evaluation of health information systems.衡量性价比:健康信息系统经济评估的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):792-801. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001422. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
9
The impact of electronic medical record systems on outpatient workflows: a longitudinal evaluation of its workflow effects.电子病历系统对门诊工作流程的影响:对其工作流程效果的纵向评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Nov;79(11):778-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
10
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.范围研究:方法学的推进。
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.