Scherer Michael, Nochajski Thomas H, Romano Eduardo, Romosz Ann, Evans Kierra, Taylor Eileen, Voas Robert
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Beltsville, Maryland.
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Washington, District of Columbia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(4):153-158. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2046270. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
Self-medication using alcohol is a common coping response among individuals dealing with trauma as is driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). A common intervention for drivers convicted of DUI, is an alcohol ignition interlock device (IID)-which requires breath samples before starting the car. If the sample is above a predetermined limit (.025), the car will not start, thus preventing impaired driving. IIDs are an effective intervention to reduce rates of drinking and driving among high risk populations; however, limited research has examined how traumatic experiences may impact performance on IIDs.
This study is an archival analysis of the Managing Heavy Drinking (MHD) study of drivers in New York state. The MHD is a comprehensive study of drivers convicted of a DUI from 2015-2020. Participants (N = 121) completed questionnaires and provided consent to retrieve information from interlock providers. Outcome variable included high BAC lockout ratios (number of high BAC lockouts [BAC>.08]/number of clean blows [BAC ≤ .025]). Other variables included demographic variables, alcohol treatment history, trauma experiences, and prior DUI history. Variables were entered into a structural equation model.
In the final structural model, pathways that demonstrated a -value of greater than .10 were dropped from the model. This produced acceptable overall model fit statistics (χ2 = 27.059(10), =.003; CFI = .900; NFI = .898; RMSEA = .063). A significant pathway was found from the trauma measure to alcohol use ( = .132), and from alcohol use to interlock performance ( = .636). However, no significant relationship was found between trauma and interlock performance other than through alcohol use.
The current study provides a useful framework upon which to understand the role traumatic experiences have on alcohol IID performance. Traumatic experiences are in of themselves insufficient to impact IID performance directly, but it may indirectly impact IID performance through increasing alcohol use.
使用酒精进行自我治疗是创伤个体常见的应对反应,酒后驾车(DUI)亦是如此。对于被判酒后驾车的司机,一种常见的干预措施是安装酒精点火联锁装置(IID),该装置在启动汽车前需要进行呼气采样。如果样本超过预定限值(.025),汽车将无法启动,从而防止酒后驾车。IID是一种有效的干预措施,可降低高危人群的酒后驾车率;然而,仅有有限的研究探讨了创伤经历如何影响IID的性能。
本研究是对纽约州司机的重度饮酒管理(MHD)研究进行的档案分析。MHD是一项对2015年至2020年被判酒后驾车的司机进行的综合研究。参与者(N = 121)完成了问卷调查,并同意从联锁装置供应商处获取信息。结果变量包括高血液酒精浓度锁定率(高血液酒精浓度锁定次数[血液酒精浓度>.08]/清洁吹气次数[血液酒精浓度≤.025])。其他变量包括人口统计学变量、酒精治疗史、创伤经历和既往酒后驾车史。将这些变量纳入结构方程模型。
在最终的结构模型中,显示p值大于.10的路径从模型中删除。这产生了可接受的整体模型拟合统计量(χ2 = 27.059(10),p =.003;CFI =.900;NFI =.898;RMSEA =.063)。发现从创伤测量到酒精使用存在一条显著路径(β =.132),从酒精使用到联锁装置性能存在一条显著路径(β =.636)。然而,除了通过酒精使用外,未发现创伤与联锁装置性能之间存在显著关系。
本研究提供了一个有用的框架,用以理解创伤经历对酒精IID性能的作用。创伤经历本身不足以直接影响IID性能,但可能通过增加酒精使用间接影响IID性能。