• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cannabis Adaptation During and After Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device Installation: A Longitudinal Study.大麻适应在和在酒精点火互锁装置安装以后:一项纵向研究。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Jul;83(4):486-493. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.486.
2
Examining the role of trauma in alcohol interlock performance: A structural pathway analysis.探究创伤在酒精联锁装置性能中的作用:结构路径分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(4):153-158. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2046270. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
3
Understanding non-installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.了解点火联锁装置未安装者:一项定性分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Sep;40(6):1083-1091. doi: 10.1111/dar.13275. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal.从因酒后驾车被捕前到酒精锁移除后的饮酒和酒后驾车结果的变化。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;45(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/acer.14558. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
5
Typologies of Drivers Convicted of Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol as Predictors of Alcohol Ignition Interlock Performance.因酒后驾车被定罪的驾驶员类型作为酒精点火联锁装置性能的预测指标
Alcohol Treat Q. 2021;39(1):96-109. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2020.1830734. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
6
Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: controlling the recidivist.呼吸酒精点火联锁装置:控制累犯
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Jan;4 Suppl 1:28-34. doi: 10.1080/1538-950391915786.
7
The impact of interlock installation on driving behavior and drinking behavior related to driving.防篡改装置对与驾驶相关的驾驶行为和饮酒行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(7):419-424. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1802020. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
Breath alcohol ignition interlock devices: controlling the recidivist.呼吸酒精点火联锁装置:控制累犯
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;4(3):199-205. doi: 10.1080/15389580309873.
9
Estimating driver risk using alcohol biomarkers, interlock blood alcohol concentration tests and psychometric assessments: initial descriptives.使用酒精生物标志物、酒精锁血液酒精浓度测试和心理评估来估计驾驶员风险:初步描述。
Addiction. 2010 Feb;105(2):226-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02738.x. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
10
Program design for incentivizing ignition interlock installation for alcohol-impaired drivers: The Ontario approach.针对酒精影响下的驾驶者激励安装点火联锁装置的项目设计:安大略省的方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt A):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential for cannabis adaptation among participants in a drunk driving intervention.酒驾干预参与者中对大麻产生适应的可能性。
J Subst Use. 2020;25(6):605-609. doi: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1749950. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Understanding non-installers of the ignition interlock device: A qualitative analysis.了解点火联锁装置未安装者:一项定性分析。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Sep;40(6):1083-1091. doi: 10.1111/dar.13275. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
3
Changes in Alcohol Use and Drinking and Driving Outcomes From Before Arrest for Driving Under the Influence to After Interlock Removal.从因酒后驾车被捕前到酒精锁移除后的饮酒和酒后驾车结果的变化。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Apr;45(4):743-751. doi: 10.1111/acer.14558. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
4
The impact of interlock installation on driving behavior and drinking behavior related to driving.防篡改装置对与驾驶相关的驾驶行为和饮酒行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(7):419-424. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1802020. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Vehicle safety features aimed at preventing alcohol-related crashes.旨在预防与酒精相关撞车事故的车辆安全特性。
Forensic Sci Rev. 2020 Jan;32(1):55-81.
6
Ethyl glucuronide hair testing: A review.乙基葡萄糖醛酸毛发检测:综述
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Jul;300:106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 8.
7
Exploring perceptions among people who drive after cannabis use: Collision risk, comparative optimism and normative influence.探究吸食大麻后仍驾车人群的认知:碰撞风险、相对乐观和规范影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019 May;38(4):443-451. doi: 10.1111/dar.12923. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
International differences in patterns of cannabis use among youth: Prevalence, perceptions of harm, and driving under the influence in Canada, England & United States.青少年大麻使用模式的国际差异:加拿大、英国和美国的流行率、危害认知和影响下驾驶情况。
Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:171-175. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
Latent Classes of Polydrug Users as a Predictor of Crash Involvement and Alcohol Consumption.多药使用者的潜在类别作为涉及撞车和饮酒的预测因子。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 May;79(3):481-489. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.481.
10
Perceptions of driving after marijuana use compared to alcohol use among rural American young adults.美国农村青年对大麻使用后驾车和酒精使用后驾车的认知比较。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):637-644. doi: 10.1111/dar.12686. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

大麻适应在和在酒精点火互锁装置安装以后:一项纵向研究。

Cannabis Adaptation During and After Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device Installation: A Longitudinal Study.

机构信息

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.

The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Jul;83(4):486-493. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.486.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2022.83.486
PMID:35838425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9318705/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A common intervention to prevent alcohol-impaired driving are alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs), which prevent drivers with a blood alcohol concentration greater than .025% from starting the car. These devices force drivers to adapt their drinking to accommodate the device. Prior studies indicated a transfer of risk as some drivers with an IID may increase cannabis use as they decrease alcohol use. This study examines whether this increase in cannabis use persists after IID removal when alcohol use reverts to pre-IID levels.

METHOD

The data are from the Managing Heavy Drinking (MHD) study of drivers in New York State. The MHD is a comprehensive three-wave study of drivers convicted of driving under the influence from 2015 to 2020. Participants ( = 189) completed all waves, and provided oral fluid/blood and hair samples to measure cannabis and alcohol use, respectively. Mixed between-within analysis of variance was conducted to assess cannabis use at IID installation (Time 1), removal (Time 2), and at 6-month follow-up (Time 3).

RESULTS

In aggregate, participants increased their cannabis use over the course of the study. Drivers who decreased their alcohol use while the IID was installed on their car significantly increased their cannabis use while the IID was in place and further increased cannabis use after the device's removal.

CONCLUSIONS

IIDs are efficacious in preventing alcohol-impaired driving. However, in some cases, they may have the unintended effect of increasing other substance use. The current study outlines the need for supplemental treatment interventions while on IID to prevent a transfer of risk to other substances, or polysubstance use after the device is removed.

摘要

目的

防止酒后驾车的常见干预措施是酒精点火联锁装置(IID),它可以防止血液酒精浓度超过.025%的驾驶员启动汽车。这些设备迫使驾驶员调整饮酒量以适应设备。先前的研究表明,由于一些安装 IID 的驾驶员可能会随着饮酒量的减少而增加大麻的使用,因此存在风险转移。本研究考察了在 IID 移除后,当酒精使用恢复到 IID 之前的水平时,这种大麻使用的增加是否持续存在。

方法

该数据来自纽约州管理重度饮酒(MHD)研究的驾驶员。MHD 是一项针对 2015 年至 2020 年因酒后驾车而被定罪的驾驶员的综合三波研究。参与者(=189)完成了所有波次,并提供了口腔液/血液和头发样本,分别用于测量大麻和酒精的使用情况。采用混合的组内-组间方差分析评估 IID 安装(时间 1)、移除(时间 2)和 6 个月随访(时间 3)时的大麻使用情况。

结果

总体而言,参与者在研究过程中增加了大麻的使用。在 IID 安装期间减少酒精使用的驾驶员在 IID 就位时显著增加了大麻的使用,并且在设备移除后进一步增加了大麻的使用。

结论

IID 可有效预防酒后驾车。然而,在某些情况下,它们可能会产生意想不到的效果,即增加其他物质的使用。本研究概述了在 IID 期间需要进行补充治疗干预,以防止风险转移到其他物质或在设备移除后出现多物质使用。