• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Different Are Threshold and Other Specified Feeding and Eating Disorders? Comparing Severity and Treatment Outcome.阈限性及其他特定的进食和喂养障碍有何不同?比较严重程度和治疗结果。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:784512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784512. eCollection 2022.
2
Outcomes in people with eating disorders: a transdiagnostic and disorder-specific systematic review, meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression analysis.饮食失调患者的结局:一项跨诊断和特定疾病的系统评价、荟萃分析及多变量荟萃回归分析。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):124-138. doi: 10.1002/wps.21182.
3
Impairments among DSM-5 eating disorders: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中饮食失调症的损害:一项系统评价与多层次荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Apr;101:102267. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102267. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
Drive for thinness provides an alternative, more meaningful, severity indicator than the DSM-5 severity indices for eating disorders.追求苗条身材为进食障碍提供了一个比 DSM-5 严重程度指标更有意义的替代严重程度指标。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):482-498. doi: 10.1002/erv.2776. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Associations between bone mineral density, body composition and amenorrhoea in females with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.饮食失调女性的骨密度、身体成分与闭经之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov 18;10(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00694-8.
6
DSM-5 eating disorders and other specified eating and feeding disorders: is there a meaningful differentiation?DSM-5 进食障碍及其他特定的进食和喂养障碍:是否有有意义的区分?
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Jul;47(5):524-33. doi: 10.1002/eat.22257. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
7
Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorders (OSFED): Clinical heterogeneity and cognitive-behavioral therapy outcome.其他特定的喂养或进食障碍(OSFED):临床异质性与认知行为疗法的结果
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;54:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
There is nothing as inconsistent as the OSFED diagnostic criteria.OSFED 的诊断标准前后不一,自相矛盾。
Trends Mol Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
Other specified and unspecified feeding or eating disorders among women in the community.社区女性中其他特定的和未特定的喂养或进食障碍。
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Nov;49(11):1010-1017. doi: 10.1002/eat.22586. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
A proposed trumping scheme for other specified feeding or eating disorder: Comment on Walsh et al., 2023.一种针对其他特定进食或喂养障碍的拟议优先方案:对沃尔什等人(2023年)的评论
Int J Eat Disord. 2023 Apr;56(4):835-837. doi: 10.1002/eat.23906. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Smartphone Application Based on Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills for Binge Eating Episodes: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一款基于辩证行为疗法技能的用于暴饮暴食发作的智能手机应用程序:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;13(14):1749. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141749.
2
Improving the diagnosis of OSFED across clinical and research settings: the development of a diagnostic flowchart.提高临床和研究环境中OSFED的诊断水平:诊断流程图的制定。
Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 23:1-17. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2025.2518374.
3
Mechanism-based subtyping in binge eating: understanding neurobehavioral heterogeneity across negative emotionality, approach behavior, and executive function.暴饮暴食中基于机制的亚型划分:理解负性情绪、趋近行为和执行功能方面的神经行为异质性
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):193. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03408-1.
4
Examining Prevalence and Presentations of Eating Disorders Across Racial/Ethnic Groups in a National, Population-Based Sample of College Students.在一项基于全国大学生人群样本中,研究不同种族/族裔群体饮食失调的患病率及表现。
Int J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun;58(6):1165-1177. doi: 10.1002/eat.24427. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
5
The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.当前针对进食和饮食障碍的临床方法旨在提高管理的个性化程度。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;24(1):4-31. doi: 10.1002/wps.21263.
6
Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Depressive Symptom Presentation and Change Throughout Routine Eating Disorder Treatment.焦虑、强迫及抑郁症状在常规饮食失调治疗过程中的表现及变化
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2025 May;33(3):490-502. doi: 10.1002/erv.3160. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
7
An Umbrella Review and a Meta-analysis of Meta-analyses of Disordered Eating Among Medical Students.医学生饮食失调的伞状综述及荟萃分析的荟萃分析
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;25(2):165-174. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241515. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Bidirectional association between eating disorder and temporomandibular joint disorder: A retrospective longitudinal nationwide population-based cohort study.饮食失调与颞下颌关节紊乱症之间的双向关联:一项基于全国人群的回顾性纵向队列研究。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr;19(2):1200-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
9
Eating disorder-related functional impairment predicts greater depressive symptoms across one semester of college.与饮食失调相关的功能损害预示着在大学一个学期里会出现更严重的抑郁症状。
Eat Behav. 2024 Apr;53:101873. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101873. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
10
When Eating Intuitively Is Not Always a Positive Response: Using Machine Learning to Better Unravel Eaters Profiles.当直觉饮食并非总是积极反应时:利用机器学习更好地剖析饮食者特征。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 8;12(16):5172. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165172.

本文引用的文献

1
An empirical evaluation of the diagnostic threshold between full-threshold and sub-threshold bulimia nervosa.对完全性和阈下性暴食障碍的诊断阈值的实证评估。
Eat Behav. 2021 Aug;42:101540. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2021.101540. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
2
The impact of duration of illness on treatment nonresponse and drop-out: Exploring the relevance of enduring eating disorder concept.患病时间对治疗无反应和脱落的影响:探索持久的进食障碍概念的相关性。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):499-513. doi: 10.1002/erv.2822. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Drive for thinness provides an alternative, more meaningful, severity indicator than the DSM-5 severity indices for eating disorders.追求苗条身材为进食障碍提供了一个比 DSM-5 严重程度指标更有意义的替代严重程度指标。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):482-498. doi: 10.1002/erv.2776. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
DSM-5 full syndrome, other specified, and unspecified eating disorders in Australian adolescents: prevalence and clinical significance.DSM-5 全面综合征、其他特定和未特定进食障碍在澳大利亚青少年中的流行率和临床意义。
Psychol Med. 2020 Apr;50(6):981-990. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000898. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorders (OSFED): Clinical heterogeneity and cognitive-behavioral therapy outcome.其他特定的喂养或进食障碍(OSFED):临床异质性与认知行为疗法的结果
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;54:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
The Impact of DSM-5 on Eating Disorder Diagnoses.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版对饮食失调诊断的影响
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 May;50(5):578-581. doi: 10.1002/eat.22628. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
7
Other specified and unspecified feeding or eating disorders among women in the community.社区女性中其他特定的和未特定的喂养或进食障碍。
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Nov;49(11):1010-1017. doi: 10.1002/eat.22586. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
8
Dysfunctional metacognition and drive for thinness in typical and atypical anorexia nervosa.典型和非典型神经性厌食症中的功能失调性元认知和对苗条的渴望。
J Eat Disord. 2015 Jul 4;3:24. doi: 10.1186/s40337-015-0060-4. eCollection 2015.
9
DSM-5 unspecified feeding and eating disorders in adolescents: what do they look like and are they clinically significant?DSM-5 未特定的青少年进食和摄食障碍:它们是什么样子的,在临床上有意义吗?
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 May;48(4):367-74. doi: 10.1002/eat.22303. Epub 2014 May 22.
10
DSM-5 eating disorders and other specified eating and feeding disorders: is there a meaningful differentiation?DSM-5 进食障碍及其他特定的进食和喂养障碍:是否有有意义的区分?
Int J Eat Disord. 2014 Jul;47(5):524-33. doi: 10.1002/eat.22257. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

阈限性及其他特定的进食和喂养障碍有何不同?比较严重程度和治疗结果。

How Different Are Threshold and Other Specified Feeding and Eating Disorders? Comparing Severity and Treatment Outcome.

作者信息

Withnell Samantha J, Kinnear Abbigail, Masson Philip, Bodell Lindsay P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 21;13:784512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784512. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.784512
PMID:35265002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8898928/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Other Specified Feeding and Eating Disorders (OSFED) are characterized by less frequent symptoms or symptoms that do not meet full criteria for another eating disorder. Despite its high prevalence, limited research has examined differences in severity and treatment outcome among patients with OSFED compared to threshold EDs [Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN), and Binge Eating Disorder (BED)]. The purpose of the current study was to examine differences in clinical presentation and treatment outcome between a heterogenous group of patients with OSFED or threshold EDs.

METHOD

Patients with threshold EDs ( = 42, = 50, BED = 14) or OSFED ( = 66) presenting for eating disorder treatment completed self-report questionnaires at intake and discharge to assess eating disorder symptoms, depression symptoms, impairment, and self-esteem.

RESULTS

At intake, OSFED patients showed lower eating concerns compared to patients with BN, but similar levels compared to AN and BED. The OSFED group showed higher restraint symptoms compared to BED, and similar restraint to AN and BN. Global symptoms as well as shape and weight concerns were similar between OSFED and threshold ED groups. There were no differences between diagnostic groups in self-esteem, depression scores, or symptom change from intake to discharge.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that individuals with OSFED showed largely similar ED psychopathology and similar decreases in symptoms across treatment as individuals diagnosed with threshold EDs. Taken together, findings challenge the idea that OSFED is less severe and more resistant to treatment than threshold EDs.

摘要

背景

其他特定的喂养和进食障碍(OSFED)的特征是症状出现频率较低,或症状不符合其他进食障碍的完整标准。尽管其患病率很高,但与临界进食障碍(神经性厌食症(AN)、神经性贪食症(BN)和暴饮暴食症(BED))相比,针对OSFED患者的严重程度和治疗结果差异的研究有限。本研究的目的是检查OSFED患者或临界进食障碍患者的异质性群体之间在临床表现和治疗结果上的差异。

方法

前来接受进食障碍治疗的临界进食障碍患者(AN = 42,BN = 50,BED = 14)或OSFED患者(n = 66)在入院和出院时完成自我报告问卷,以评估进食障碍症状、抑郁症状、功能损害和自尊。

结果

入院时,与BN患者相比,OSFED患者的进食问题较少,但与AN和BED患者的水平相似。与BED患者相比,OSFED组的克制症状更高,与AN和BN患者的克制症状相似。OSFED组和临界进食障碍组在整体症状以及体型和体重问题方面相似。在自尊、抑郁评分或从入院到出院的症状变化方面,诊断组之间没有差异。

讨论

我们的研究结果表明,与被诊断为临界进食障碍的个体相比,OSFED个体在很大程度上表现出相似的进食障碍精神病理学,并且在整个治疗过程中症状减少程度相似。综上所述,研究结果挑战了OSFED比临界进食障碍症状较轻且对治疗更具抗性的观点。