School of Management and Economics, Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China.
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Feb 27;2022:3008947. doi: 10.1155/2022/3008947. eCollection 2022.
Knowledge, capabilities, and quality can be used as three temperatures in employee value-added characteristics in corporate employee performance. They are closely coupled, and knowledge is the basis of ability and quality. The ability is to form and develop in the process of mastering knowledge. The quality is a potential ability. The quality itself is not the ability. Quality is a relatively stable quality and accomplishment formed by internalizing knowledge and skills acquired from the outside into people's body and mind through individual cognition and social practice on the basis of innate physiology and under the influence of acquired environment and psychology. Quality determines whether the employee's knowledge and ability can function correctly and effectively, and is the director of knowledge capabilities. According to the analysis and learning from scholars of literature employees' job performance evaluation, we constructed an employee performance evaluation index system of evaluation on the basis of value-based employees. In this system, there are three levels of evaluation indicators. The level indicators are as follows: knowledge of value-added indicators, the ability to add value, and quality index value. These indicators are consistent with the analysis of employee training objectives and psychological quality. In this study, for each level of each indicator we have specific labeling instructions, which is more convenient for the relevant calculations.
知识、能力和素质可以作为企业员工绩效中员工增值特征的三个维度。它们紧密结合,知识是能力和素质的基础。能力是在掌握知识的过程中形成和发展的。素质是一种潜在的能力。素质本身不是能力。素质是个体在先天生理的基础上,通过个体认知和社会实践,将从外部获得的知识和技能内化到身心中,受到后天环境和心理的影响而形成的相对稳定的品质和素养。素质决定了员工的知识和能力能否正确有效地发挥作用,是知识和能力的导向。根据文献中对员工工作绩效评价学者的分析和学习,我们在基于价值的员工绩效评价的基础上构建了员工绩效评价指标体系。在这个系统中,有三个层次的评价指标。层次指标如下:增值指标的知识、增值能力和质量指数。这些指标与员工培训目标和心理素质的分析是一致的。在本研究中,对于每个层次的每个指标,我们都有具体的标注说明,这更便于相关计算。