Department of Internal Medicine in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Witold Chodźko Street 7, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Doctoral School, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland.
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 22;14(5):930. doi: 10.3390/nu14050930.
The aim of the review was to analyse the challenges of using indirect calorimetry in patients with sepsis, including the limitations of this method. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. The analysis concerned the methodology and presentation of research results. In most studies assessing energy expenditure, energy expenditure was expressed in kcal per day ( = 9) and as the mean and standard deviation ( = 7). Most authors provided a detailed measurement protocol, including measurement duration ( = 10) and device calibration information ( = 7). Ten papers provided information on the day of hospitalisation when the measurements were obtained, nine on patient nutrition, and twelve on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion of participants from the study. Small study group sizes and study at a single centre were among the most cited limitations. Studies assessing energy expenditure in patients with sepsis by indirect calorimetry differ in the methodology and presentation of results, and their collective analysis is difficult. A meta-analysis of the results could enable multi-site and large patient evaluation. Standardisation of protocols and presentation of all collected data would enable their meta-analysis, which would help to achieve greater knowledge about metabolism in sepsis.
本次综述的目的是分析在脓毒症患者中使用间接热量测定法的挑战,包括该方法的局限性。对文献进行了系统的回顾。分析涉及研究结果的方法和呈现。在评估能量消耗的大多数研究中,能量消耗以千卡/天(=9)和平均值及标准差(=7)表示。大多数作者提供了详细的测量方案,包括测量持续时间(=10)和设备校准信息(=7)。有 10 篇论文提供了测量时住院日期的信息,9 篇论文提供了关于患者营养的信息,12 篇论文提供了关于纳入和排除研究参与者的标准的信息。小的研究组大小和在单个中心的研究是最常被引用的局限性之一。通过间接热量测定法评估脓毒症患者能量消耗的研究在方法和结果呈现方面存在差异,因此对其进行综合分析具有一定难度。对结果进行荟萃分析可以实现多地点和大量患者的评估。标准化方案和呈现所有收集的数据将能够进行荟萃分析,这有助于更好地了解脓毒症中的代谢。