Suppr超能文献

新型及重新粘结的正畸陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度和托槽基底形态

Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets.

作者信息

Urichianu Mihai, Makowka Steven, Covell David, Warunek Stephen, Al-Jewair Thikriat

机构信息

Private Practice, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA.

Dental Materials Research Laboratory, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;15(5):1865. doi: 10.3390/ma15051865.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (1) to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two ceramic brackets when new and when rebonded following various bracket base conditioning methods, and (2) to determine bond failure mode relative to bracket base morphology. 100 Symetri Clear (SC) and 100 Radiance Plus (RP) ceramic brackets were bonded to bovine incisors and divided into five groups: one group served as controls and four had brackets rebonded following conditioning by: no surface treatment, sealant, sandblasting, and flame then steam. SBS, adhesive remnant index, and bracket base morphology were evaluated. SBS showed no statistical difference between new and rebonded with no surface treatment or sealant (SC brackets) and with sealant or flame and steam (RP brackets). When comparing SC to RP, SBS was higher with SC, no surface treatment, and sandblasted groups. All groups had varying amounts of adhesive left on the tooth, with the sandblasted group having the most. SEM analysis showed that sandblasting damaged the retention features of bracket bases. In conclusion, when rebonded, the SBS of SC brackets that had no surface treatment and both SC and RP brackets that had sealant showed no significant differences to new brackets. Sandblasting damaged the retention features of SC and RP bracket bases, resulting in low SBS.

摘要

本研究的目的是

(1)评估两种陶瓷托槽在新安装时以及在经过各种托槽底座预处理方法后重新粘结时的剪切粘结强度(SBS);(2)确定相对于托槽底座形态的粘结失败模式。将100个Symetri Clear(SC)陶瓷托槽和100个Radiance Plus(RP)陶瓷托槽粘结到牛切牙上,并分为五组:一组作为对照组,另外四组在经过以下预处理后重新粘结托槽:不进行表面处理、使用密封剂、喷砂以及火焰然后蒸汽处理。对SBS、粘结剂残留指数和托槽底座形态进行了评估。对于SC托槽,新安装时与不进行表面处理或使用密封剂重新粘结时的SBS没有统计学差异;对于RP托槽,使用密封剂或火焰然后蒸汽处理重新粘结时的SBS没有统计学差异。当比较SC和RP时,SC、不进行表面处理和喷砂处理组的SBS更高。所有组在牙齿上都残留了不同量的粘结剂,喷砂处理组残留的粘结剂最多。扫描电子显微镜分析表明,喷砂处理破坏了托槽底座的固位特征。总之,重新粘结时,未进行表面处理的SC托槽以及使用密封剂的SC和RP托槽的SBS与新托槽相比没有显著差异。喷砂处理破坏了SC和RP托槽底座的固位特征,导致SBS较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8911633/070d70070597/materials-15-01865-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验