School of Nursing, California State University, Fullerton, 800 North State College, Fullerton, CA 92807, USA.
Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, 800 North State College, Fullerton, CA 92807, USA.
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;39:41-53. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.11.011. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Schools of Nursing are challenged to increase student diversification as there continues to be documented college achievement gaps in students who come from under-resourced, low socioeconomic communities with difficult environmental constraints and lifestyle issues.
The purpose of this 3-year study was to test a social determinants of education (SDE) model with 400 diverse nursing students.
The SDE framework was analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM)) to estimate the influence of background social determinants, emotional intelligence and lifestyle on students' ability to integrate into collegiate academic and social support systems and to persist to graduation with professional values. Qualitative analysis was completed on student input on support.
Social determinants student lifestyles and emotional intelligence explained over 26% of the variance of academic integration, and academic integration explained over 19% of the variance of the student outcome of persistence. 11% of professional values was accounted for by the combination of parent education, social support, lifestyle and emotional intelligence, academic integration, and persistence. Qualitative analyses also supported the SDE Framework with themes that included life balance, academic relationships and communication, and career.
The SDE Framework offers faculty and administrators with targeted factors to consider when assessing and providing resources to enable students to achieve their maximal capacity to succeed in college and in their careers.
护理学院面临着增加学生多样性的挑战，因为来自资源匮乏、社会经济地位低的社区的学生在大学学业中存在明显差距，这些学生面临着困难的环境限制和生活方式问题。
这项为期 3 年的研究旨在用 400 名不同的护理专业学生来测试一个教育社会决定因素（SDE）模型。
使用结构方程模型（SEM）分析 SDE 框架，以评估背景社会决定因素、情绪智力和生活方式对学生融入大学学术和社会支持系统以及坚持专业价值观毕业的能力的影响。对学生对支持的反馈进行了定性分析。
学生生活方式和情绪智力的社会决定因素解释了学术融合方差的 26%以上，学术融合解释了学生坚持学业的方差的 19%以上。父母教育、社会支持、生活方式和情绪智力、学术融合和坚持学业这几个因素共同解释了 11%的职业价值观。定性分析也支持了 SDE 框架，主题包括生活平衡、学术关系和沟通以及职业。
SDE 框架为教师和管理人员提供了有针对性的因素，以便在评估和提供资源时考虑，使学生能够发挥最大能力在大学和职业生涯中取得成功。
