Agnew Jonathon M R, Hanratty Catherine E, McVeigh Joseph G, Nugent Chris, Kerr Daniel P
Discipline in Physiotherapy, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Mar 11;9(1):e33609. doi: 10.2196/33609.
Musculoskeletal physiotherapy provides conservative management for a range of conditions. Currently, there is a lack of engagement with exercise programs because of the lack of supervision and low self-efficacy. The use of mobile health (mHealth) interventions could be a possible solution to this problem, helping promote self-management at home. However, there is little evidence for musculoskeletal physiotherapy on the most effective forms of mHealth.
The aim of this review is to investigate the literature focusing on the use of mHealth in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and summarize the evidence.
A scoping review of 6 peer-reviewed databases was conducted in March 2021. No date limits were applied, and only articles written in the English language were selected. A reviewer screened all the articles, followed by 2 additional researchers screening a random sample before data extraction.
Of the 1393 studies, 28 (2.01%) were identified. Intervention characteristics comprised stretching and strengthening exercises, primarily for degenerative joint pain and spinal conditions (5/28, 18%). The most reported use of mHealth included telephone and videoconferencing calls to provide a home exercise program or being used as an adjunct to physiotherapy musculoskeletal assessment (14/28, 50%). Although patient satisfaction with mHealth was reported to be high, reasons for disengagement included a lack of high-quality information and poor internet speeds. Barriers to clinical uptake included insufficient training with the intervention and a lack of time to become familiar.
mHealth has some benefits regarding treatment adherence and can potentially be as effective as normal physiotherapy care while being more cost-effective. The current use of mHealth is most effective when ongoing feedback from a health care professional is available.
肌肉骨骼物理治疗为一系列病症提供保守治疗。目前,由于缺乏监督和自我效能感低,患者对运动计划的参与度不足。使用移动健康(mHealth)干预措施可能是解决这一问题的办法,有助于促进在家中的自我管理。然而,关于肌肉骨骼物理治疗中最有效的mHealth形式,几乎没有证据。
本综述的目的是调查关注mHealth在肌肉骨骼物理治疗中应用的文献并总结证据。
2021年3月对6个同行评审数据库进行了范围综述。未设日期限制,仅选择英文撰写的文章。一名评审员筛选了所有文章,另外两名研究人员在数据提取前对随机样本进行了筛选。
在1393项研究中,识别出28项(2.01%)。干预特征包括伸展和强化运动,主要针对退行性关节疼痛和脊柱疾病(5/28,18%)。最常报告的mHealth用途包括通过电话和视频会议提供家庭运动计划或用作肌肉骨骼物理治疗评估的辅助手段(14/28,50%)。尽管据报告患者对mHealth的满意度较高,但退出的原因包括缺乏高质量信息和网速不佳。临床应用的障碍包括对干预措施的培训不足以及缺乏熟悉的时间。
mHealth在治疗依从性方面有一些益处,可能与常规物理治疗护理一样有效,同时成本效益更高。当有医疗保健专业人员的持续反馈时,目前mHealth的使用最为有效。