• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字饮食评估工具 MyFoodRepo 的性能。

Performance of the Digital Dietary Assessment Tool MyFoodRepo.

机构信息

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2022 Feb 1;14(3):635. doi: 10.3390/nu14030635.

DOI:10.3390/nu14030635
PMID:35276994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8838173/
Abstract

Digital dietary assessment devices could help overcome the limitations of traditional tools to assess dietary intake in clinical and/or epidemiological studies. We evaluated the accuracy of the automated dietary app MyFoodRepo (MFR) against controlled reference values from weighted food diaries (WFD). MFR's capability to identify, classify and analyze the content of 189 different records was assessed using Cohen and uniform kappa coefficients and linear regressions. MFR identified 98.0% ± 1.5 of all edible components and was not affected by increasing numbers of ingredients. Linear regression analysis showed wide limits of agreement between MFR and WFD methods to estimate energy, carbohydrates, fat, proteins, fiber and alcohol contents of all records and a constant overestimation of proteins, likely reflecting the overestimation of portion sizes for meat, fish and seafood. The MFR mean portion size error was 9.2% ± 48.1 with individual errors ranging between -88.5% and +242.5% compared to true values. Beverages were impacted by the app's difficulty in correctly identifying the nature of liquids (41.9% ± 17.7 of composed beverages correctly classified). Fair estimations of portion size by MFR, along with its strong segmentation and classification capabilities, resulted in a generally good agreement between MFR and WFD which would be suited for the identification of dietary patterns, eating habits and regime types.

摘要

数字饮食评估设备可以帮助克服传统工具在临床和/或流行病学研究中评估饮食摄入的局限性。我们评估了自动饮食应用程序 MyFoodRepo(MFR)对加权食物日记(WFD)的对照参考值的准确性。使用 Cohen 和统一kappa 系数和线性回归评估了 MFR 识别、分类和分析 189 种不同记录内容的能力。MFR 识别了 98.0%±1.5%的所有可食用成分,且不受成分数量增加的影响。线性回归分析表明,MFR 和 WFD 方法之间的估计能量、碳水化合物、脂肪、蛋白质、纤维和酒精含量的协议界限很宽,且对所有记录的蛋白质都存在恒定的高估,这可能反映了对肉、鱼和海鲜的部分大小的高估。MFR 的平均部分大小误差为 9.2%±48.1%,与真实值相比,个体误差范围在-88.5%至+242.5%之间。与 WFD 相比,MFR 对液体的性质正确识别存在困难,这影响了对饮料的评估(41.9%±17.7%的组成饮料被正确分类)。MFR 对部分大小的估计比较准确,加上其强大的分割和分类功能,导致 MFR 和 WFD 之间的总体协议良好,这将适合于识别饮食模式、饮食习惯和饮食类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/8838173/0a56055f4b30/nutrients-14-00635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/8838173/c8a9465d8de6/nutrients-14-00635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/8838173/0a56055f4b30/nutrients-14-00635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/8838173/c8a9465d8de6/nutrients-14-00635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15bd/8838173/0a56055f4b30/nutrients-14-00635-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance of the Digital Dietary Assessment Tool MyFoodRepo.数字饮食评估工具 MyFoodRepo 的性能。
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 1;14(3):635. doi: 10.3390/nu14030635.
2
New mobile methods for dietary assessment: review of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods.新的饮食评估移动方法:图像辅助和基于图像的饮食评估方法综述。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):283-294. doi: 10.1017/S0029665116002913. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.智能手机图像膳食评估应用与 3 天食物日记评估加拿大成年人膳食摄入量的有效性和可用性:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 9;8(9):e16953. doi: 10.2196/16953.
4
The Accuracy of Portion Size Reporting on Self-Administered Online 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Among Women With Low Incomes.低收入女性自行在线报告 24 小时膳食回忆中份量大小的准确性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec;122(12):2243-2256. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Merging dietary assessment with the adolescent lifestyle.将饮食评估与青少年生活方式相结合。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Jan;27 Suppl 1(0 1):82-8. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12071. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.与传统的访员管理式回忆法相比,在24小时回忆法中使用数字图像可能会减少对食物分量的误判。
J Nutr. 2016 Dec;146(12):2567-2573. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237271. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Reported Energy Intake Accuracy Compared to Doubly Labeled Water and Usability of the Mobile Food Record among Community Dwelling Adults.社区居住成年人中报告的能量摄入准确性与双标记水法的比较及移动食物记录的可用性
Nutrients. 2017 Mar 22;9(3):312. doi: 10.3390/nu9030312.
8
Relative validity of an intelligent ordering system to estimate dietary intake among university students from a medical school in Shanghai, China.智能点餐系统在中国上海某医学院校大学生膳食摄入评估的相对有效性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 4;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01619-1.
9
Development and Evaluation of e-CA, an Electronic Mobile-Based Food Record.基于电子移动设备的食物记录e-CA的开发与评估。
Nutrients. 2017 Jan 18;9(1):76. doi: 10.3390/nu9010076.
10
Development and validation of a food photography manual, as a tool for estimation of food portion size in epidemiological dietary surveys in Tunisia.食品摄影手册的编制与验证:作为突尼斯流行病学饮食调查中估计食物份量的工具
Libyan J Med. 2016 Aug 31;11:32676. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v11.32676. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to non-pharmacological management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a qualitative evidence synthesis.代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病非药物管理的障碍与促进因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 29;16:1615809. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1615809. eCollection 2025.
2
Genomics of host-microbiome interactions in humans.人类宿主-微生物组相互作用的基因组学
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00849-8.
3
Metagenomic estimation of dietary intake from human stool.基于宏基因组学的人体粪便饮食摄入量估算。

本文引用的文献

1
The Bland-Altman method should not be used when one of the two measurement methods has negligible measurement errors.当两种测量方法中的一种具有可忽略的测量误差时,不应使用 Bland-Altman 方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278915. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of PIQNIQ, a Novel Mobile Application for Capturing Dietary Intake.PIQNIQ 评价:一种用于记录饮食摄入的新型移动应用程序。
J Nutr. 2021 May 11;151(5):1347-1356. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab012.
3
Evaluation of the Ability of Diet-Tracking Mobile Applications to Estimate Energy and Nutrient Intake in Japan.
Nat Metab. 2025 Mar;7(3):617-630. doi: 10.1038/s42255-025-01220-1. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
The metabolic and circadian signatures of gestational diabetes in the postpartum period characterised using multiple wearable devices.使用多种可穿戴设备对产后妊娠期糖尿病的代谢和昼夜节律特征进行表征。
Diabetologia. 2025 Feb;68(2):419-432. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06318-x. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
The future backbone of nutritional science: integrating public health priorities with system-oriented precision nutrition.营养科学的未来支柱:将公共卫生重点与系统为导向的精准营养相结合。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 14;132(5):651-666. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524001466. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Digital Dietary Behaviors in Individuals With Depression: Real-World Behavioral Observation.抑郁症患者的数字化饮食行为:真实世界的行为观察。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Apr 22;10:e47428. doi: 10.2196/47428.
7
NutriGreen image dataset: a collection of annotated nutrition, organic, and vegan food products.NutriGreen图像数据集:一组带有注释的营养、有机和纯素食品产品。
Front Nutr. 2024 Mar 26;11:1342823. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1342823. eCollection 2024.
8
Food & You: A digital cohort on personalized nutrition.食物与你:一个关于个性化营养的数字队列。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Nov 30;2(11):e0000389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000389. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
The Bland-Altman method should not be used when one of the two measurement methods has negligible measurement errors.当两种测量方法中的一种具有可忽略的测量误差时,不应使用 Bland-Altman 方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278915. eCollection 2022.
评估日本饮食追踪移动应用程序估算能量和营养素摄入量的能力。
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 29;12(11):3327. doi: 10.3390/nu12113327.
4
Accuracy of Nutrient Calculations Using the Consumer-Focused Online App MyFitnessPal: Validation Study.使用面向消费者的在线应用程序 MyFitnessPal 进行营养计算的准确性:验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 21;22(10):e18237. doi: 10.2196/18237.
5
Review of the validity and feasibility of image-assisted methods for dietary assessment.图像辅助膳食评估方法的有效性和可行性综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Dec;44(12):2358-2371. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00693-2. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
6
Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.智能手机图像膳食评估应用与 3 天食物日记评估加拿大成年人膳食摄入量的有效性和可用性:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 9;8(9):e16953. doi: 10.2196/16953.
7
"Everyone can take photos." Feasibility and relative validity of phone photography-based assessment of children's diets - a mixed methods study.“人人都能拍照。”基于手机摄影的儿童膳食评估方法的可行性和相对有效性——一项混合方法研究。
Nutr J. 2020 May 27;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00558-4.
8
Validation of a digitally displayed photographic food portion-size estimation aid among women in urban and rural Malawi.验证数字化显示的摄影食物分量估计辅助工具在马拉维城乡女性中的有效性。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3140-3150. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002428. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Measuring lunchtime consumption in school cafeterias: a validation study of the use of digital photography.在学校食堂测量午餐消费:使用数字摄影的验证研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jul;22(10):1745-1754. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900048X. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Relative Validity of the Eat and Track (EaT) Smartphone App for Collection of Dietary Intake Data in 18-to-30-Year Olds.18 至 30 岁人群中使用 Eat and Track(EaT)智能手机应用程序收集膳食摄入量数据的相对有效性。
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 14;11(3):621. doi: 10.3390/nu11030621.