• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过多尺度模拟理解 TNF 介导热力学信号中膜约束的功能作用。

Understanding the functional role of membrane confinements in TNF-mediated signaling by multiscale simulations.

机构信息

Department of Systems and Computational Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.

出版信息

Commun Biol. 2022 Mar 11;5(1):228. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03179-1.

DOI:10.1038/s42003-022-03179-1
PMID:35277586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8917213/
Abstract

The interaction between TNFα and TNFR1 is essential in maintaining tissue development and immune responses. While TNFR1 is a cell surface receptor, TNFα exists in both soluble and membrane-bound forms. Interestingly, it was found that the activation of TNFR1-mediated signaling pathways is preferentially through the soluble form of TNFα, which can also induce the clustering of TNFR1 on plasma membrane of living cells. We developed a multiscale simulation framework to compare receptor clustering induced by soluble and membrane-bound ligands. Comparing with the freely diffusive soluble ligands, we hypothesize that the conformational dynamics of membrane-bound ligands are restricted, which affects the clustering of ligand-receptor complexes at cell-cell interfaces. Our simulation revealed that only small clusters can form if TNFα is bound on cell surface. In contrast, the clustering triggered by soluble TNFα is more dynamic, and the size of clusters is statistically larger. We therefore demonstrated the impact of membrane-bound ligand on dynamics of receptor clustering. Moreover, considering that larger TNFα-TNFR1 clusters is more likely to provide spatial platform for downstream signaling pathway, our studies offer new mechanistic insights about why the activation of TNFR1-mediated signaling pathways is not preferred by membrane-bound form of TNFα.

摘要

TNFα 和 TNFR1 之间的相互作用对于维持组织发育和免疫反应至关重要。虽然 TNFR1 是一种细胞表面受体,但 TNFα 存在可溶性和膜结合两种形式。有趣的是,研究发现 TNFR1 介导的信号通路的激活更倾向于通过可溶性 TNFα 形式,而后者也可以诱导活细胞质膜上 TNFR1 的聚集。我们开发了一个多尺度模拟框架来比较可溶性和膜结合配体诱导的受体聚集。与自由扩散的可溶性配体相比,我们假设膜结合配体的构象动力学受到限制,这会影响细胞间界面上配体-受体复合物的聚集。我们的模拟表明,如果 TNFα 结合在细胞表面,只有小的簇才能形成。相比之下,可溶性 TNFα 引发的聚类更具动态性,并且聚类的大小在统计学上更大。因此,我们证明了膜结合配体对受体聚类动力学的影响。此外,考虑到更大的 TNFα-TNFR1 簇更有可能为下游信号通路提供空间平台,我们的研究提供了关于为什么 TNFR1 介导的信号通路的激活不被 TNFα 的膜结合形式所偏好的新的机制见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/f131f3a68015/42003_2022_3179_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/7d405cadf0b0/42003_2022_3179_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/9f502286e275/42003_2022_3179_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/9f54d4687237/42003_2022_3179_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/d7047c6b5444/42003_2022_3179_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/a1e2405fdbde/42003_2022_3179_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/f131f3a68015/42003_2022_3179_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/7d405cadf0b0/42003_2022_3179_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/9f502286e275/42003_2022_3179_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/9f54d4687237/42003_2022_3179_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/d7047c6b5444/42003_2022_3179_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/a1e2405fdbde/42003_2022_3179_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5298/8917213/f131f3a68015/42003_2022_3179_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding the functional role of membrane confinements in TNF-mediated signaling by multiscale simulations.通过多尺度模拟理解 TNF 介导热力学信号中膜约束的功能作用。
Commun Biol. 2022 Mar 11;5(1):228. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03179-1.
2
How does the same ligand activate signaling of different receptors in TNFR superfamily: a computational study.相同配体如何激活肿瘤坏死因子受体超家族中不同受体的信号传导:一项计算研究
J Cell Commun Signal. 2023 Sep;17(3):657-671. doi: 10.1007/s12079-022-00701-2. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Computational simulations of TNF receptor oligomerization on plasma membrane.在等离子体膜上 TNF 受体寡聚化的计算模拟。
Proteins. 2020 May;88(5):698-709. doi: 10.1002/prot.25854. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
A multiscale study on the mechanisms of spatial organization in ligand-receptor interactions on cell surfaces.细胞表面配体-受体相互作用中空间组织机制的多尺度研究。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 Mar 23;19:1620-1634. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.024. eCollection 2021.
5
Single-molecule imaging reveals the oligomeric state of functional TNFα-induced plasma membrane TNFR1 clusters in cells.单分子成像揭示了功能性 TNFα诱导的细胞表面 TNFR1 簇的寡聚状态。
Sci Signal. 2020 Jan 14;13(614):eaax5647. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aax5647.
6
The tumor necrosis factor receptor stalk regions define responsiveness to soluble versus membrane-bound ligand.肿瘤坏死因子受体茎部区域决定对可溶性配体与膜结合配体的反应性。
Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Jul;32(13):2515-29. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06458-11. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Identification of novel inhibitors for TNFα, TNFR1 and TNFα-TNFR1 complex using pharmacophore-based approaches.基于药效基团的方法鉴定新型 TNFα、TNFR1 及 TNFα-TNFR1 复合物抑制剂。
J Transl Med. 2019 Jul 2;17(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1965-5.
8
Dual function of cysteine rich domain (CRD) 1 of TNF receptor type 1: conformational stabilization of CRD2 and control of receptor responsiveness.肿瘤坏死因子受体 1 富含半胱氨酸域(CRD)1 的双重功能:CRD2 的构象稳定和受体反应性的控制。
Cell Signal. 2010 Mar;22(3):404-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.10.011.
9
A comparative study on inhibition of total astragalus saponins and astragaloside IV on TNFR1-mediated signaling pathways in arterial endothelial cells.黄芪总皂苷与黄芪甲苷对动脉内皮细胞中TNFR1介导信号通路抑制作用的比较研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e101504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101504. eCollection 2014.
10
NAK is recruited to the TNFR1 complex in a TNFalpha-dependent manner and mediates the production of RANTES: identification of endogenous TNFR-interacting proteins by a proteomic approach.NAK以肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)依赖的方式被招募至肿瘤坏死因子受体1(TNFR1)复合物,并介导调节激活正常T细胞表达和分泌的趋化因子(RANTES)的产生:通过蛋白质组学方法鉴定内源性TNFR相互作用蛋白。
J Biol Chem. 2004 Dec 17;279(51):53266-71. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411037200. Epub 2004 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Apoptotic signaling by TNFR1 is inhibited by the α2-6 sialylation, but not α2-3 sialylation, of the TNFR1 N-glycans.TNFR1的N-聚糖的α2-6唾液酸化而非α2-3唾液酸化可抑制TNFR1介导的凋亡信号传导。
J Biol Chem. 2025 Jan;301(1):108043. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108043. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Exploring the role of macromolecular crowding and TNFR1 in cell volume control.探讨大分子拥挤和 TNFR1 在细胞体积控制中的作用。
Elife. 2024 Sep 19;13:e92719. doi: 10.7554/eLife.92719.
3
Membranes on the move: The functional role of the extracellular vesicle membrane for contact-dependent cellular signalling.

本文引用的文献

1
A multiscale study on the mechanisms of spatial organization in ligand-receptor interactions on cell surfaces.细胞表面配体-受体相互作用中空间组织机制的多尺度研究。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 Mar 23;19:1620-1634. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.024. eCollection 2021.
2
Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors by Cheminformatics Approaches and Bio-Molecular Simulation.基于结构的肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂的化学信息学方法和生物分子模拟虚拟筛选。
Biomolecules. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):329. doi: 10.3390/biom11020329.
3
Receptor Oligomerization and Its Relevance for Signaling by Receptors of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily.
膜在迁移:细胞外囊泡膜在接触依赖性细胞信号传递中的功能作用。
J Extracell Vesicles. 2024 Apr;13(4):e12436. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12436.
4
The Role of TNF-α in Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review.TNF-α 在阿尔茨海默病中的作用:叙述性综述。
Cells. 2023 Dec 26;13(1):54. doi: 10.3390/cells13010054.
5
A computational study for understanding the impact of p120-catenin on the cis-dimerization of cadherin.一种理解 p120 连环蛋白对钙黏蛋白顺式二聚化影响的计算研究。
J Mol Cell Biol. 2024 Apr 4;15(9). doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjad055.
6
Extracellular Vesicle-Associated TWEAK Contributes to Vascular Inflammation and Remodeling During Acute Cellular Rejection.细胞外囊泡相关的肿瘤坏死因子样弱凋亡诱导因子促成急性细胞排斥反应期间的血管炎症和重塑。
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 11;8(5):439-456. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.09.014. eCollection 2023 May.
7
How does the same ligand activate signaling of different receptors in TNFR superfamily: a computational study.相同配体如何激活肿瘤坏死因子受体超家族中不同受体的信号传导:一项计算研究
J Cell Commun Signal. 2023 Sep;17(3):657-671. doi: 10.1007/s12079-022-00701-2. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
受体寡聚化及其与肿瘤坏死因子受体超家族受体信号传导的相关性。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Feb 11;8:615141. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.615141. eCollection 2020.
4
Structural insights into the disruption of TNF-TNFR1 signalling by small molecules stabilising a distorted TNF.小分子通过稳定变形的 TNF 来破坏 TNF-TNFR1 信号传导的结构见解。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 25;12(1):582. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20828-3.
5
The Glycosphingolipid GM3 Modulates Conformational Dynamics of the Glucagon Receptor.糖鞘脂GM3调节胰高血糖素受体的构象动力学。
Biophys J. 2020 Jul 21;119(2):300-313. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
A computational model for understanding the oligomerization mechanisms of TNF receptor superfamily.一种用于理解肿瘤坏死因子受体超家族寡聚化机制的计算模型。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Jan 18;18:258-270. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.016. eCollection 2020.
7
Conformational states of TNFR1 as a molecular switch for receptor function.TNFR1 的构象状态作为受体功能的分子开关。
Protein Sci. 2020 Jun;29(6):1401-1415. doi: 10.1002/pro.3829. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
8
Targeting Regulatory T Cells by Addressing Tumor Necrosis Factor and Its Receptors in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cancer.针对肿瘤坏死因子及其受体在异基因造血细胞移植和癌症中的作用,靶向调节性 T 细胞。
Front Immunol. 2019 Aug 28;10:2040. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02040. eCollection 2019.
9
TNFR1 and TNFR2 in the Control of the Life and Death Balance of Macrophages.肿瘤坏死因子受体1和肿瘤坏死因子受体2对巨噬细胞生死平衡的调控
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 May 29;7:91. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00091. eCollection 2019.
10
The TNF Family of Ligands and Receptors: Communication Modules in the Immune System and Beyond.肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)家族配体和受体:免疫系统内外的通讯模块。
Physiol Rev. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):115-160. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2017.