• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国围产医学网络应用“十组分类系统”实施审核反馈后剖宫产率的变化:一项回顾性前后对照研究。

Cesarean section rate changes after audit and feedback with the Ten Group Classification System in a French perinatal network: A retrospective pre-post study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Intercommunal Hospital Centre of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France.

EA 7285, Research Unit "Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health", Versailles-Saint- Quentin University (UVSQ), Montigny le Bretonneux, France.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Apr;101(4):388-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14327. Epub 2022 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.14327
PMID:35277968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9564817/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The rise in the number of cesarean sections (CS) is a major health public problem which concerns nearly all countries. It is suggested that the Ten Group Classification System be adapted to a procedure of audit/feedback cycles, which could have an effect on CS practice. Therefore, we aimed to study changes in CS rates between maternity wards in a perinatal network after implementation of the Ten Group Classification System in an audit with feedback.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective pre-post study of all births from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2018, in a French perinatal network of 10 maternity wards in the Yvelines district of France. All live births occurring at a gestational age ≥24 weeks in the network were included. During the pre-period (1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014), the audit and feedback provided only overall CS rates. During the post-period (1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018), CS rates for each Robson Ten Group Classification System group were provided. Regression models, adjusted for maternal characteristics and maternity ward, were used to compare CS rates globally and for each group of the system. Variability of CS rates between maternity wards was analyzed using the coefficients of variation.

RESULTS

There were 51 082 women who delivered during the pre-period and 63 964 during the post-period. The overall CS rate did not decrease (24.5% during the pre-period vs 25.1% during the post-period). There were no significant differences in CS rates for any group of the Ten Group Classification System after adjustment for maternity, maternal age and sociodemographic characteristics, nor did audit implementation decrease CS rate variability between maternity wards or within groups of the system.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an audit-and-feedback cycle using the Ten Group Classification System did not decrease either CS rates or variability between maternity wards.

摘要

简介

剖宫产率的上升是一个主要的公共卫生问题,几乎所有国家都对此表示关注。有人建议将 Ten Group 分类系统适应于审核/反馈循环程序,这可能对剖宫产术实践产生影响。因此,我们旨在研究在实施审核和反馈后,在围产期网络中的 10 个产科病房中,Ten Group 分类系统对剖宫产率的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项回顾性的产前产后研究,研究对象为 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在法国伊夫林省围产期网络中的 10 个产科病房中所有活产,包括网络中胎龄≥24 周的所有活产。在前期(2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日),审核和反馈仅提供剖宫产总体率。在后期(2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日),提供了 Robson Ten Group 分类系统的每个组的剖宫产率。调整产妇特征和产科病房后,使用回归模型比较了总体和系统每个组的剖宫产率。使用变异系数分析了产科病房之间剖宫产率的变异性。

结果

前期有 51082 名妇女分娩,后期有 63964 名妇女分娩。总体剖宫产率没有下降(前期为 24.5%,后期为 25.1%)。调整产科、产妇年龄和社会人口学特征后,Ten Group 分类系统的任何组之间的剖宫产率均无显著差异,审核的实施也没有降低产科病房之间或系统组内的剖宫产率变异性。

结论

使用 Ten Group 分类系统实施审核和反馈循环既没有降低剖宫产率,也没有降低产科病房之间的变异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/8fd3211bcde3/AOGS-101-388-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/0e6500e378cf/AOGS-101-388-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/f57e40765514/AOGS-101-388-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/8fd3211bcde3/AOGS-101-388-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/0e6500e378cf/AOGS-101-388-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/f57e40765514/AOGS-101-388-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f23/9564817/8fd3211bcde3/AOGS-101-388-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cesarean section rate changes after audit and feedback with the Ten Group Classification System in a French perinatal network: A retrospective pre-post study.法国围产医学网络应用“十组分类系统”实施审核反馈后剖宫产率的变化:一项回顾性前后对照研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Apr;101(4):388-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14327. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
2
Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.临床审计对西班牙一家医院剖宫产率的影响:根据罗布森分类法对6年数据的分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review.利用罗伯逊分类法进行审核和反馈以降低剖宫产率:系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Cesarean delivery in Iran: a population-based analysis using the Robson classification system.伊朗的剖宫产术:基于人群的应用 Robson 分类系统分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04517-1.
5
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.迈向更好的审计:除剖宫产外的其他结局的 Robson Ten 分组分类系统。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
6
The rate of cesarean delivery changes after internal audit based on the Robson Ten Group Classification System in Lebanon.根据黎巴嫩的罗布森十组分类系统进行内部审计后,剖宫产率发生了变化。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;161(1):314-319. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14610. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
7
Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.三级教学医院中按罗伯逊十组分类的剖宫产分娩变化趋势。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Dec;91(12):1422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
8
Robsons Ten Group Classification of Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Center in Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级中心的罗布斯顿剖宫产分类法。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):91-96. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i1.2694.
9
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.项目适宜分娩和剖宫产率降低:应用罗伯逊分类系统进行的分析。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
10
Use of ten-group Robson Classification in Türkiye to discuss cesarean section trends.土耳其使用十组 Robson 分类法探讨剖宫产趋势。
Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;75(4):333-339. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05154-5. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmarking Cesarean Section Trends: A Case Study from Tu Du Hospital Using Robson's Model.剖宫产趋势的基准研究:以图德医院为例,采用罗布森模型进行的案例分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;13(16):2070. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162070.
2
Reducing caesarean section rates in Robson groups 1 and 3: a quality improvement initiative in a private Brazilian hospital.降低罗布森分类法第1组和第3组的剖宫产率:巴西一家私立医院的质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 4;14(1):e003077. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003077.
3
Developing a streamlined risk-adjusted cesarean section rate model for evaluation of obstetrical quality across hospitals by using EHRs: A provincial-scale multicenter retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
General methods for measuring and comparing medical interventions in childbirth: a framework.分娩中医疗干预措施的测量和比较的一般方法:一个框架。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 7;20(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02945-5.
2
Monitoring caesarean births using the Robson ten group classification system: A cross-sectional survey of private for-profit facilities in urban Bangladesh.使用 Robson 十组分类系统监测剖宫产分娩:孟加拉国城市私立营利性医疗机构的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220693. eCollection 2019.
3
Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.
利用电子健康记录开发一种简化的风险调整剖宫产率模型,以评估各医院的产科质量:一项省级多中心回顾性研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 22;10:20552076241284726. doi: 10.1177/20552076241284726. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review.按罗布森十组分类系统分类的剖宫产频率:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41091. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41091. eCollection 2023 Jun.
减少健康妇女和婴儿不必要剖宫产的干预措施。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5.
4
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
5
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
6
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
7
Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术对母婴及后续妊娠的长期风险和获益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23;15(1):e1002494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys.1995年至2016年法国大都市围产期健康趋势:法国国家围产期调查结果
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec;46(10):701-713. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review.利用罗伯逊分类法进行审核和反馈以降低剖宫产率:系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.