Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
Stem Cells. 2022 Apr 29;40(4):423-434. doi: 10.1093/stmcls/sxac006.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) respond to environmental forces with both cytoskeletal re-structuring and activation of protein chaperones of mechanical information, β-catenin, and yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1). To function, MSCs must differentiate between dynamic forces such as cyclic strains of extracellular matrix due to physical activity and static strains due to ECM stiffening. To delineate how MSCs recognize and respond differently to both force types, we compared effects of dynamic (200 cycles × 2%) and static (1 × 2% hold) strain on nuclear translocation of β-catenin and YAP1 at 3 hours after force application. Dynamic strain induced nuclear accumulation of β-catenin, and increased cytoskeletal actin structure and cell stiffness, but had no effect on nuclear YAP1 levels. Critically, both nuclear actin and nuclear stiffness increased along with dynamic strain-induced β-catenin transport. Augmentation of cytoskeletal structure using either static strain or lysophosphatidic acid did not increase nuclear content of β-catenin or actin, but induced robust nuclear increase in YAP1. As actin binds β-catenin, we considered whether β-catenin, which lacks a nuclear localization signal, was dependent on actin to gain entry to the nucleus. Knockdown of cofilin-1 (Cfl1) or importin-9 (Ipo9), which co-mediate nuclear transfer of G-actin, prevented dynamic strain-mediated nuclear transfer of both β-catenin and actin. In sum, dynamic strain induction of actin re-structuring promotes nuclear transport of G-actin, concurrently supporting nuclear access of β-catenin via mechanisms used for actin transport. Thus, dynamic and static strain activate alternative mechanoresponses reflected by differences in the cellular distributions of actin, β-catenin, and YAP1.
间质干细胞 (MSCs) 通过细胞骨架重构和机械信息蛋白伴侣(β-catenin 和 yes 相关蛋白 1 (YAP1))的激活来响应环境力量。为了发挥作用,MSCs 必须区分动态力和静态力。动态力是由于身体活动引起的细胞外基质的循环应变,而静态力是由于细胞外基质变硬引起的应变。为了阐明 MSCs 如何识别和不同地响应这两种类型的力,我们比较了动态(200 个循环×2%)和静态(1×2%保持)应变对力施加后 3 小时β-catenin 和 YAP1 的核易位的影响。动态应变诱导β-catenin 核积累,并增加细胞骨架肌动蛋白结构和细胞刚性,但对核 YAP1 水平没有影响。重要的是,核肌动蛋白和核刚性都随着动态应变诱导的β-catenin 转运而增加。使用静态应变或溶血磷脂酸增强细胞骨架结构不会增加核内β-catenin 或肌动蛋白含量,但会诱导 YAP1 的核内大量增加。由于肌动蛋白与β-catenin 结合,我们考虑了缺乏核定位信号的β-catenin 是否依赖肌动蛋白进入细胞核。Cofilin-1 (Cfl1) 或 Importin-9 (Ipo9) 的敲低(共同介导 G-actin 的核转移)阻止了动态应变介导的β-catenin 和肌动蛋白的核转移。总之,动态应变诱导的肌动蛋白重构促进了 G-actin 的核转运,同时通过用于肌动蛋白转运的机制支持β-catenin 的核进入。因此,动态应变和静态应变通过肌动蛋白、β-catenin 和 YAP1 的细胞分布差异激活了替代的机械反应。