García-Vicuña Rosario, Rodriguez-García Sebastián C, Abad-Santos Francisco, Bautista Hernández Azucena, García-Fraile Lucio, Barrios Blandino Ana, Gutiérrez Liarte Angela, Alonso-Pérez Tamara, Cardeñoso Laura, Alfranca Aránzazu, Mejía-Abril Gina, Sanz Sanz Jesús, González-Alvaro Isidoro
Rheumatology Service, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 23;9:819621. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.819621. eCollection 2022.
The use of IL-6 blockers in COVID-19 hospitalized patients has been associated with a reduction in mortality compared to standard care. However, many uncertainties remain pertaining to optimal intervention time, administration schedule, and predictors of response. To date, data on the use of subcutaneous sarilumab is limited and no randomized trial results are available.
Open label randomized controlled trial at a single center in Spain. We included adult patients admitted with microbiology documented COVID-19 infection, imaging confirmed pneumonia, fever and/or laboratory evidence of inflammatory phenotype, and no need for invasive ventilation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive sarilumab, a single 400 mg dose in two 200 mg subcutaneous injections, added to standard care or standard care, in a 2:1 proportion. Primary endpoints included 30-day mortality, mean change in clinical status at day 7 scored in a 7-category ordinal scale ranging from death (category 1) to discharge (category 7), and duration of hospitalization. The primary efficacy analysis was conducted on the intention-to-treat population.
A total of 30 patients underwent randomization: 20 to sarilumab and 10 to standard care. Most patients were male (20/30, 67%) with a median (interquartile range) age of 61.5 years (56-72). At day 30, 2/20 (10%) patients died in the sarilumab arm vs. none (0/10) in standard care (Log HR 15.11, SE 22.64; = 0.54). At day 7, no significant differences were observed in the median change in clinical status (2 [0-3]) vs. 3 [0-3], = 0.32). Median time to discharge (days) was similar (7 [6-11] vs. 6 [4-12]; HR 0.65, SE 0.26; = 0.27). No significant differences were detected in the rate of progression to invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation.
Our pragmatic pilot study has failed to demonstrate the benefit of adding subcutaneous sarilumab to standard care for mortality by 30 days, functional status at day 7, or hospital stay. Findings herein do not exclude a potential effect of sarilumab in severe COVID-19 but adequately powered blinded randomized phase III trials are warranted to assess the impact of the subcutaneous route and a more selected target population.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04357808.
与标准治疗相比,在新冠肺炎住院患者中使用白细胞介素-6阻断剂与死亡率降低有关。然而,在最佳干预时间、给药方案和反应预测因素方面仍存在许多不确定性。迄今为止,关于皮下注射萨瑞鲁单抗使用的数据有限,尚无随机试验结果。
在西班牙的一个单一中心进行开放标签随机对照试验。我们纳入了因微生物学确诊为新冠肺炎感染、影像学证实为肺炎、发热和/或有炎症表型实验室证据且无需有创通气的成年患者。参与者被随机分配接受萨瑞鲁单抗(分两次皮下注射,每次200mg,共400mg单剂量)加标准治疗或标准治疗,比例为2:1。主要终点包括30天死亡率、第7天临床状态的平均变化(采用7分类有序量表评分,范围从死亡(第1类)到出院(第7类))以及住院时间。主要疗效分析在意向性治疗人群中进行。
共有30例患者进行了随机分组:20例接受萨瑞鲁单抗治疗,10例接受标准治疗。大多数患者为男性(20/30,67%),中位(四分位间距)年龄为61.5岁(56 - 72岁)。在第30天,萨瑞鲁单抗组有2/20(10%)的患者死亡,而标准治疗组无死亡(对数风险比15.11,标准误22.64;P = 0.54)。在第7天,临床状态的中位变化无显著差异(2 [0 - 3] 对比 3 [0 - 3],P = 0.32)。中位出院时间(天)相似(7 [6 - 11] 对比 6 [4 - 12];风险比0.65,标准误0.26;P = 0.27)。在进展为有创和无创机械通气的发生率方面未检测到显著差异。
我们的实用性初步研究未能证明在标准治疗基础上加用皮下注射萨瑞鲁单抗对30天死亡率、第7天功能状态或住院时间有益处。本文的研究结果不排除萨瑞鲁单抗在重症新冠肺炎中的潜在作用,但需要有足够效力的双盲随机III期试验来评估皮下给药途径以及更具针对性的目标人群的影响。