MRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, United Kingdom.
Berry Consultants, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270668. eCollection 2022.
A recent prospective meta-analysis demonstrated that interleukin-6 antagonists are associated with lower all-cause mortality in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, compared with usual care or placebo. However, emerging evidence suggests that clinicians are favouring the use of tocilizumab over sarilumab. A new randomised comparison of these agents from the REMAP-CAP trial shows similar effects on in-hospital mortality. Therefore, we initiated a network meta-analysis, to estimate pairwise associations between tocilizumab, sarilumab and usual care or placebo with 28-day mortality, in COVID-19 patients receiving concomitant corticosteroids and ventilation, based on all available direct and indirect evidence.
Eligible trials randomised hospitalised patients with COVID-19 that compared tocilizumab or sarilumab with usual care or placebo in the prospective meta-analysis or that directly compared tocilizumab with sarilumab. Data were restricted to patients receiving corticosteroids and either non-invasive or invasive ventilation at randomisation. Pairwise associations between tocilizumab, sarilumab and usual care or placebo for all-cause mortality 28 days after randomisation were estimated using a frequentist contrast-based network meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs), implementing multivariate fixed-effects models that assume consistency between the direct and indirect evidence.
One trial (REMAP-CAP) was identified that directly compared tocilizumab with sarilumab and supplied results on all-cause mortality at 28-days. This network meta-analysis was based on 898 eligible patients (278 deaths) from REMAP-CAP and 3710 eligible patients from 18 trials (1278 deaths) from the prospective meta-analysis. Summary ORs were similar for tocilizumab [0·82 [0·71-0·95, p = 0·008]] and sarilumab [0·80 [0·61-1·04, p = 0·09]] compared with usual care or placebo. The summary OR for 28-day mortality comparing tocilizumab with sarilumab was 1·03 [95%CI 0·81-1·32, p = 0·80]. The p-value for the global test of inconsistency was 0·28.
Administration of either tocilizumab or sarilumab was associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality compared with usual care or placebo. The association is not dependent on the choice of interleukin-6 receptor antagonist.
最近一项前瞻性荟萃分析表明,与常规治疗或安慰剂相比,白细胞介素 6 拮抗剂可降低 COVID-19 住院患者的全因死亡率。然而,新出现的证据表明,临床医生更倾向于使用托珠单抗而不是沙利鲁单抗。来自 REMAP-CAP 试验的这两种药物的新随机比较显示,它们对住院死亡率的影响相似。因此,我们启动了一项网络荟萃分析,根据所有现有直接和间接证据,估算 COVID-19 患者在接受皮质类固醇和通气的同时使用托珠单抗、沙利鲁单抗与常规治疗或安慰剂治疗 28 天的死亡率之间的两两关联。
合格的试验随机纳入了 COVID-19 住院患者,这些患者在前瞻性荟萃分析中比较了托珠单抗或沙利鲁单抗与常规治疗或安慰剂的疗效,或者直接比较了托珠单抗与沙利鲁单抗的疗效。数据仅限于随机分组时接受皮质类固醇和非侵入性或侵入性通气的患者。使用基于比值比(OR)的频率对比网络荟萃分析方法,通过多变量固定效应模型,对 28 天后所有原因死亡率的托珠单抗、沙利鲁单抗与常规治疗或安慰剂的两两关联进行了估计,该模型假设直接证据和间接证据之间的一致性。
确定了一项直接比较托珠单抗和沙利鲁单抗的试验(REMAP-CAP),并提供了该试验 28 天全因死亡率的结果。该网络荟萃分析基于 REMAP-CAP 中的 898 名合格患者(278 例死亡)和前瞻性荟萃分析中的 18 项试验中的 3710 名合格患者(1278 例死亡)。托珠单抗[0.82(0.71-0.95,p=0.008)]和沙利鲁单抗[0.80(0.61-1.04,p=0.09)]与常规治疗或安慰剂相比,OR 相似。比较托珠单抗与沙利鲁单抗 28 天死亡率的汇总 OR 为 1.03(95%CI,0.81-1.32,p=0.80)。全局一致性检验的 p 值为 0.28。
与常规治疗或安慰剂相比,使用托珠单抗或沙利鲁单抗可降低 28 天全因死亡率。这种关联并不取决于白细胞介素 6 受体拮抗剂的选择。