• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种同域物种叶片对温度的生理和解剖学响应

Leaf physiological and anatomical responses of two sympatric species to temperature.

作者信息

Feng Jing-Qiu, Wang Ji-Hua, Zhang Shi-Bao

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

出版信息

Plant Divers. 2021 May 17;44(1):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.05.001. eCollection 2022 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2021.05.001
PMID:35281120
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8897187/
Abstract

and are two endangered orchid species, with high ornamental and conservation values. They are sympatric species, but their leaf anatomical traits and flowering period have significant differences. However, it is unclear whether the differences in leaf structure of the two species will affect their adaptabilities to temperature. Here, we investigated the leaf photosynthetic, anatomical, and flowering traits of these two species at three sites with different temperatures (Kunming, 16.7 ± 0.2 °C; Puer, 17.7 ± 0.2 °C; Menglun, 23.3 ± 0.2 °C) in southwest China. Compared with those at Puer and Kunming, the values of light-saturated photosynthetic rate (P), stomatal conductance (g), leaf thickness (LT), and stomatal density (SD) in both species were lower at Menglun. The values of P, g, LT, adaxial cuticle thickness (CT) and SD in were higher than those of at the three sites. Compared with , there were no flowering plants of at Menglun. These results indicated that both species were less resistance to high temperature, and had a stronger adaptability to high-temperature than . Our findings can provide valuable information for the conservation and cultivation of species.

摘要

[物种名称1]和[物种名称2]是两种濒危兰花物种,具有很高的观赏和保护价值。它们是同域物种,但叶片解剖特征和花期存在显著差异。然而,尚不清楚这两个物种的叶片结构差异是否会影响它们对温度的适应性。在此,我们在中国西南部三个温度不同的地点(昆明,16.7±0.2°C;普洱,17.7±0.2°C;勐仑,23.3±0.2°C)调查了这两个物种的叶片光合、解剖和开花特征。与普洱和昆明的相比,两个物种在勐仑的光饱和光合速率(P)、气孔导度(g)、叶片厚度(LT)和气孔密度(SD)值均较低。在三个地点,[物种名称1]的P、g、LT、上表皮角质层厚度(CT)和SD值均高于[物种名称2]。与[物种名称1]相比,[物种名称2]在勐仑没有开花植株。这些结果表明,两个物种对高温的耐受性均较差,且[物种名称1]对高温的适应性强于[物种名称2]。我们的研究结果可为[物种名称]的保护和栽培提供有价值的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/1eb08bdc01cf/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/d83a398ed7c8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/e80de18bbab3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/1eb08bdc01cf/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/d83a398ed7c8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/e80de18bbab3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2be5/8897187/1eb08bdc01cf/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Leaf physiological and anatomical responses of two sympatric species to temperature.两种同域物种叶片对温度的生理和解剖学响应
Plant Divers. 2021 May 17;44(1):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2021.05.001. eCollection 2022 Jan.
2
Different Strategies for Photosynthetic Regulation under Fluctuating Light in Two Sympatric Species.两种共生种在波动光下的光合调节的不同策略。
Cells. 2021 Jun 10;10(6):1451. doi: 10.3390/cells10061451.
3
Ecophysiological significance of leaf traits in Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum.杓兰属和兜兰属叶片性状的生理生态学意义。
Physiol Plant. 2011 Jan;141(1):30-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01418.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
4
Is seasonal flowering time of species caused by differences in initial time of floral bud differentiation?物种的季节性开花时间是由花芽分化初始时间的差异引起的吗?
AoB Plants. 2021 Aug 20;13(5):plab053. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plab053. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Slow photosynthetic induction and low photosynthesis in Paphiopedilum armeniacum are related to its lack of guard cell chloroplast and peculiar stomatal anatomy.杏黄兜兰光合诱导缓慢和光合效率低与其缺少保卫细胞叶绿体和特殊的气孔结构有关。
Physiol Plant. 2011 Jun;142(2):118-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01448.x. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
6
Leaf anatomical structures of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium and their adaptive significance.杓兰属和兜兰属的叶解剖结构及其适应意义。
J Plant Res. 2011 Mar;124(2):289-98. doi: 10.1007/s10265-010-0372-z. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
7
Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae.解剖学和扩散因素在叶片内解释了兰科杓兰属和兜兰属之间光合能力的差异。
Photosynth Res. 2018 Jun;136(3):315-328. doi: 10.1007/s11120-017-0466-8. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Floral Longevity of and Is Associated With Floral Morphology.[植物名称1]和[植物名称2]的花寿命与花形态相关。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 May 31;12:637236. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.637236. eCollection 2021.
9
The effects of chilling-light stress on photosystems I and II in three Paphiopedilum species.低温光照胁迫对三种兜兰属植物光系统I和光系统II的影响。
Bot Stud. 2017 Nov 25;58(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40529-017-0208-4.
10
Effects of temperature on leaf hydraulic architecture of tobacco plants.温度对烟草植株叶片水力结构的影响。
Planta. 2014 Sep;240(3):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2097-z. Epub 2014 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
First Report of a Histological Technique for Observing the Anatomy of the Epidermis of Melinis minutiflora.关于观察细柄黍表皮解剖结构的组织学技术的首次报告。
Microsc Res Tech. 2025 Oct;88(10):2771-2782. doi: 10.1002/jemt.70010. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
2
Effects of exogenous calcium and calcium inhibitor on physiological characteristics of winter turnip rape (Brassica rapa) under low temperature stress.外源钙和钙抑制剂对低温胁迫下冬油菜(甘蓝型油菜)生理特性的影响。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05556-w.
3
The complete chloroplast genome of (D. Don) Rehd. (Labiatae), an ornamental plant with high medicinal value.

本文引用的文献

1
Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy?地中海常绿栎对光照和养分的低叶级响应:一种保守的资源利用策略?
New Phytol. 2000 Oct;148(1):79-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00737.x.
2
Functional and Structural Leaf Plasticity Determine Photosynthetic Performances during Drought Stress and Recovery in Two Platanus orientalis Populations from Contrasting Habitats.功能和结构叶片可塑性决定了来自不同生境的两个悬铃木种群在干旱胁迫和恢复过程中的光合性能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 30;21(11):3912. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113912.
3
Drought stress modify cuticle of tender tea leaf and mature leaf for transpiration barrier enhancement through common and distinct modes.
具有高药用价值的观赏植物(唇形科)毛萼香茶菜(D. Don)Rehd. 的完整叶绿体基因组。
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2023 Feb 28;8(3):336-341. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2023.2183069. eCollection 2023.
干旱胁迫通过共同和不同的模式来改变细嫩茶叶和成熟茶叶的角质层,从而增强蒸腾屏障。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 21;10(1):6696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63683-4.
4
Leaf Anatomy, Morphology and Photosynthesis of Three Tundra Shrubs after 7-Year Experimental Warming on Changbai Mountain.长白山7年实验性增温后三种苔原灌木的叶片解剖结构、形态及光合作用
Plants (Basel). 2019 Aug 7;8(8):271. doi: 10.3390/plants8080271.
5
Increasing atmospheric CO2 and canopy temperature induces anatomical and physiological changes in leaves of the C4 forage species Panicum maximum.大气 CO2 浓度增加和冠层温度升高会引起 C4 饲用物种象草叶片解剖结构和生理特性的变化。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 19;14(2):e0212506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212506. eCollection 2019.
6
Differential Responses of Stomata and Photosynthesis to Elevated Temperature in Two Co-occurring Subtropical Forest Tree Species.两种共生亚热带森林树种气孔与光合作用对温度升高的差异响应
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 10;9:467. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00467. eCollection 2018.
7
Leaf physiological and anatomical responses of Lantana and Ligustrum species under different water availability.不同水分条件下马缨丹和女贞属植物的叶片生理和解剖响应。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018 Jun;127:380-392. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
The effects of chilling-light stress on photosystems I and II in three Paphiopedilum species.低温光照胁迫对三种兜兰属植物光系统I和光系统II的影响。
Bot Stud. 2017 Nov 25;58(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40529-017-0208-4.
9
Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae.解剖学和扩散因素在叶片内解释了兰科杓兰属和兜兰属之间光合能力的差异。
Photosynth Res. 2018 Jun;136(3):315-328. doi: 10.1007/s11120-017-0466-8. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Floral Mass per Area and Water Maintenance Traits Are Correlated with Floral Longevity in (Orchidaceae).每面积的花量和水分维持特性与(兰科)植物的花寿命相关。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Apr 7;8:501. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00501. eCollection 2017.