• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查对象对调查问卷格式偏好的社会人口统计学差异:抽样偏差及对外部效度的潜在威胁。

Sociodemographic Differences in Respondent Preferences for Survey Formats: Sampling Bias and Potential Threats to External Validity.

作者信息

Chen Szu-Wei, Keglovits Marian, Devine Megen, Stark Susan

机构信息

School of Medicine, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States.

出版信息

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Dec 13;4(1):100175. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100175. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100175
PMID:35282151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8904875/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore sampling bias as a result of survey format selection by examining associations between characteristics of people aging with long-term physical disability (PAwLTPD) and their preferences for phone or web-based survey format.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study using a secondary data analysis approach.

SETTING

Data were from an ongoing longitudinal cohort study conducted in the community.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sampling was used. PAwLTPD who participated in year 2 of the longitudinal cohort study were included. Inclusion criteria were age 45-65 years, English speaking, and self-reported onset of a physical disability at least 5 years prior to study recruitment. Two participants completed the survey using both phone and web formats and were thus excluded; 387 participants (N=387) were included in the analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Choice of survey format and demographics (age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, living arrangement, socioeconomic status) were collected in addition to self-rated physical health.

RESULTS

Participants were on average 58.2±5.6 years old. A total of 33% were male, and 62% were White. Approximately 40% of participants completed phone surveys. The phone survey group was significantly older (=-4.76, <.001) and had lower education (=11133, =-6.65, <.001) and lower self-rated physical health (=15420, =-2.38, ) than the web survey group. Participants who were White (χ=60.69; =1; <.001; odds ratio [OR], 0.18) or were in a long-term relationship were less likely to choose phone surveys (χ=42.20; =1; <.001; OR, 0.21). Those who earned $10,008 or less annually (χ=53.90; =1; <.001; OR, 5.22) or who lived alone (χ=36.26; =1; <.001; OR, 3.64) were more likely to choose phone surveys. Participants with paid work (χ=16.81, =1, <.001) tended to select web-based surveys, while those on disability leave (χ=9.61, =1, <.01) were more likely to choose phone surveys.

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographics are associated with survey format choice in PAwLTPD. Findings largely support the existing understanding of digital literacy but also provide insight into the potential occurrence of sampling bias when multiple survey format options are not offered. These findings have implications for investigators who aim to reach a more representative sample of people with disabilities.

摘要

目的

通过研究长期身体残疾的老年人(PAwLTPD)的特征与其对电话或基于网络的调查形式的偏好之间的关联,探讨因调查形式选择导致的抽样偏差。

设计

采用二次数据分析方法的横断面研究。

背景

数据来自正在进行的社区纵向队列研究。

参与者

采用便利抽样。纳入参与纵向队列研究第2年的PAwLTPD。纳入标准为年龄45 - 65岁、说英语、且在研究招募前至少5年自我报告有身体残疾。两名参与者同时使用电话和网络形式完成了调查,因此被排除;387名参与者(N = 387)纳入分析。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

除自我评定的身体健康状况外,还收集了调查形式的选择和人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族和民族、婚姻状况、居住安排、社会经济地位)。

结果

参与者平均年龄为58.2±5.6岁。33%为男性,62%为白人。约40%的参与者完成了电话调查。电话调查组的年龄显著更大(=-4.76,<.001),教育程度更低(=11133,=-6.65,<.001),自我评定的身体健康状况也更低(=15420,=-2.38,),相比网络调查组。白人参与者(χ=60.69;=1;<.001;优势比[OR],0.18)或处于长期关系中的参与者选择电话调查的可能性较小(χ=42.20;=1;<.001;OR,0.21)。年收入10,008美元及以下的参与者(χ=53.90;=1;<.001;OR,5.22)或独居的参与者(χ=36.26;=1;<.001;OR,3.64)选择电话调查的可能性更大。有带薪工作的参与者(χ=16.81,=1,<.001)倾向于选择基于网络的调查,而休病假的参与者(χ=9.61,=1,<.01)更有可能选择电话调查。

结论

社会人口统计学特征与PAwLTPD的调查形式选择相关。研究结果在很大程度上支持了对数字素养的现有理解,但也深入了解了在未提供多种调查形式选项时抽样偏差可能发生的情况。这些发现对旨在获得更具代表性的残疾人群样本的研究者具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic Differences in Respondent Preferences for Survey Formats: Sampling Bias and Potential Threats to External Validity.调查对象对调查问卷格式偏好的社会人口统计学差异:抽样偏差及对外部效度的潜在威胁。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Dec 13;4(1):100175. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100175. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Telephone peer recruitment and interviewing during a respondent-driven sampling (RDS) survey: feasibility and field experience from the first phone-based RDS survey among men who have sex with men in Côte d'Ivoire.电话同侪招募和访谈在回应者驱动抽样(RDS)调查中的应用:来自科特迪瓦首次基于电话的男男性行为者 RDS 调查的可行性和现场经验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01208-x.
3
Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.采样和数据收集方法对产妇调查应答率的影响:纸质和推送至网络调查与同期社交媒体调查的随机对照试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01833-8.
4
Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.评估不列颠哥伦比亚省接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性在使用基于网络的调查问卷时参与者偏好和人口统计学特征的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 22;18(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5068.
5
Mobile Phone Ownership, Health Apps, and Tablet Use in US Adults With a Self-Reported History of Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study.美国高血压患者中手机拥有率、健康类应用程序使用情况以及平板电脑使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 14;7(1):e12228. doi: 10.2196/12228.
6
[Old and new long stay patients in French psychiatric institutions: results from a national random survey with two-year follow-up].[法国精神病院的新老长期住院患者:一项为期两年随访的全国随机调查结果]
Encephale. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4 Pt 1):466-76. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82408-x.
7
Use of Telephone and Digital Channels to Engage Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Adults in Health Disparities Research Within a Social Service Setting: Cross-Sectional Study.在社会服务环境中利用电话和数字渠道促使社会经济弱势成年人参与健康差异研究:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):e16680. doi: 10.2196/16680.
8
Considerations for conducting Web-based survey research with people living with human immunodeficiency virus using a community-based participatory approach.使用基于社区的参与式方法对感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的人群进行基于网络的调查研究的注意事项。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 13;16(3):e81. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3064.
9
Prevalence and Predictors of Health-Related Internet and Digital Device Use in a Sample of South Asian Adults in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Results From a 2014 Community-Based Survey.在加拿大阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿的一个南亚成年人样本中,与健康相关的互联网和数字设备使用的流行率及其预测因素:2014 年基于社区的调查结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):e20671. doi: 10.2196/20671.
10
The Use of Multimode Data Collection in Random Digit Dialing Cell Phone Surveys for Young Adults: Feasibility Study.多模式数据收集在随机数字拨号手机调查中对年轻人的应用:可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e31545. doi: 10.2196/31545.

引用本文的文献

1
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Exploration of Diagnosis Experience in Saudi Women.多囊卵巢综合征:沙特女性诊断经验的全面探索
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 7;13(17):5305. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175305.
2
A United States-based patient-reported adult polyglucosan body disease registry: initial results.一个基于美国的患者报告的成人多聚葡萄糖体病登记处:初步结果。
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2024 Mar 4;5:26330040241227452. doi: 10.1177/26330040241227452. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Age-Related Differences in Anxiety and Depression Diagnosis among Adults in Puerto Rico during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
"You Never Get Used to Loneliness" - Older Adults' Experiences of Loneliness When Applying for Going on a Senior Summer Camp.“你永远无法习惯孤独”——老年人申请参加老年夏令营时的孤独体验
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2019 Nov-Dec;62(8):892-911. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2019.1687633.
2
Electronic-Based Patient-Reported Outcomes: Willingness, Needs, and Barriers in Adjuvant and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.基于电子设备的患者报告结局:辅助性和转移性乳腺癌患者的意愿、需求及障碍
JMIR Cancer. 2017 Aug 7;3(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/cancer.6996.
3
Digital divide among people with disabilities: Analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online.
波多黎各成年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的焦虑和抑郁诊断的年龄相关差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 23;20(11):5922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20115922.
4
COVID-19: Factors Predicting Depressive Symptoms in People Aging With Long-Term Physical Disabilities.COVID-19:预测长期身体残疾的老年人出现抑郁症状的因素。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Apr;43(2):194-201. doi: 10.1177/15394492221107557. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
The effect of exercise and affect regulation skills on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey.运动和情绪调节技巧对 COVID-19 大流行期间心理健康的影响:一项横断面调查。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Jun;312:114559. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114559. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
残疾人中的数字鸿沟:对一项全国性研究数据的分析,该研究旨在探讨互联网使用及在线活动的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179825. eCollection 2017.
4
Response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients.使用基于网络问卷与纸质问卷的患者报告结局的应答率:老年结直肠癌患者两种邀请方式的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 7;17(5):e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3741.
5
How to assess the external validity and model validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach to systematic review methodology.如何评估治疗试验的外部有效性和模型有效性:系统评价方法学的概念方法。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:694804. doi: 10.1155/2014/694804. Epub 2014 Jan 19.
6
Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities.残疾和非残疾老年人的技术使用模式。
Gerontologist. 2015 Jun;55(3):412-21. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt166. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
7
Hip and knee replacement patients prefer pen-and-paper questionnaires: Implications for future patient-reported outcome measure studies.髋关节和膝关节置换患者更喜欢纸笔问卷:对未来患者报告结局测量研究的启示。
Bone Joint Res. 2013 Nov 7;2(11):238-44. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.211.2000219. Print 2013.
8
A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies.基于人群队列研究中保留方法效果的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 19;11:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249.
9
Convenience samples and caregiving research: how generalizable are the findings?便利样本与护理研究:研究结果的可推广性如何?
Gerontologist. 2008 Dec;48(6):820-7. doi: 10.1093/geront/48.6.820.