Department of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Clostridioides difficile (ESGCD), Basel, Switzerland; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Host and Microbiota Interaction (ESGHAMI).
Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Aug;28(8):1085-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.03.001. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are traditionally attributed to an older adult patient group but children can also be affected. Although the causative pathogen is the same in both populations, the management of CDI may differ.
To discuss the current literature on CDI in the paediatric population and to provide CDI diagnostics and treatment guidance.
The literature was drawn from a search of PubMed from January 2017 to July 2021.
In the paediatric population, laboratory diagnostics for CDI should preferably be combined with laboratory diagnostics for other gastrointestinal pathogens. Coinfections of CDI are also possible. Though the detection of toxigenic C. difficile using a molecular assay may simply reflect colonisation rather than infection, detection of C. difficile free toxins A/B in faeces is much more indicative of true infection. CDI in children below 2 years of age and in the absence of risk factors is very difficult to diagnose and requires careful clinical judgement pending additional studies. Fidaxomicin has been shown to be superior to vancomycin with a sustained clinical response up to 30 days after the end of CDI treatment in children. Metronidazole is less effective than vancomycin in adults and there are no supporting data for its use in children. In recurrent CDI, treatment should be adjusted according to the drug or drug regimen used for the treatment of a previous episode(s). In multiple recurrent CDI, faecal microbiota transplantation can be effective.
If CDI laboratory testing is indicated in children with diarrhoea, the likelihood of C. difficile colonisation and coinfection with other intestinal pathogens should be considered. The currently available data support a change in the treatment strategy of CDI in children.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)传统上归因于老年患者群体,但儿童也可能受到影响。尽管两种人群中的病原体相同,但 CDI 的治疗可能有所不同。
讨论儿科人群中 CDI 的当前文献,并提供 CDI 诊断和治疗指导。
文献来源于 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月 PubMed 的搜索。
在儿科人群中,CDI 的实验室诊断最好结合其他胃肠道病原体的实验室诊断。CDI 也可能存在合并感染。虽然使用分子检测法检测产毒艰难梭菌可能仅反映定植而不是感染,但检测粪便中无毒素 A/B 更能表明真正的感染。2 岁以下儿童且无危险因素的 CDI 非常难以诊断,需要根据临床判断,等待进一步研究。在儿童中, fidaxomicin 已被证明优于万古霉素,在 CDI 治疗结束后 30 天内具有持续的临床反应。甲硝唑在成人中的疗效不如万古霉素,并且没有支持其在儿童中使用的数据。在复发性 CDI 中,应根据先前发作(s)治疗中使用的药物或药物方案调整治疗。在多次复发性 CDI 中,粪便微生物群移植可能有效。
如果腹泻的儿童需要进行 CDI 实验室检测,则应考虑艰难梭菌定植的可能性以及与其他肠道病原体的合并感染。目前可用的数据支持改变儿童 CDI 的治疗策略。