• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种握力计(Jamar® Plus 和 K-Force® Grip)在两种体位下测量握力的有效性、可靠性和重测研究。

Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.

机构信息

Denizli Vocational School of Health Services, Pamukkale University, Kınıklı Campus D Block, 20070, Kınıklı/Denizli, Turkey.

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Akdeniz University, 07058, Campus/Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022 Jun;41(3):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007
PMID:35283336
Abstract

Our objective was to compare grip strength measurement in two body positions (sitting and standing) with the K-Force® Grip dynamometer and the Jamar® Plus Digital hand dynamometer, and to conduct a test-retest study of the K-Force Grip device. The study was conducted on 50 healthy young adults aged 18-25 years. Maximal grip strength was tested in sitting and standing positions with both devices. After 2 days, a re-test was conducted with the K-Force Grip. The correlation coefficient was high for grip strength measurements in sitting and standing positions with the K-Force Grip and Jamar Plus dynamometers (r > 0.9 for all). K-Force Grip values were similar in sitting and standing positions (p > 0.05). Despite this similarity, K-Force Grip measured significantly lower values than Jamar Plus (p < 0.05). Thus, the K-Force Grip device can be used as an alternative to the Jamar Plus dynamometer, regarded as the gold standard in evaluating grip strength. We believe that the same devices should be used in clinical studies, research, and patient follow-up.

摘要

我们的目的是比较两种体位(坐姿和站姿)下使用 K-Force®握力计和 Jamar®Plus 数字握力计测量握力的情况,并对 K-Force 握力计进行测试-再测试研究。该研究纳入了 50 名年龄在 18-25 岁的健康年轻成年人。使用两种设备分别测试坐姿和站姿时的最大握力。2 天后,使用 K-Force 握力计进行了再测试。K-Force 握力计在坐姿和站姿时与 Jamar Plus 测力计的测量值之间的相关系数很高(r>0.9,所有位置均如此)。K-Force 握力计在坐姿和站姿时的数值相似(p>0.05)。尽管如此,K-Force 握力计的测量值明显低于 Jamar Plus(p<0.05)。因此,K-Force 握力计可以替代被视为评估握力的金标准的 Jamar Plus 测力计。我们认为,在临床研究、研究和患者随访中,应使用相同的设备。

相似文献

1
Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.两种握力计(Jamar® Plus 和 K-Force® Grip)在两种体位下测量握力的有效性、可靠性和重测研究。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022 Jun;41(3):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.《研究与握力计相比,压力传感器型握力计的可靠性和有效性,以及可靠握力测量次数。》
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Oct;28(5):562-572. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500601. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults.使用数字手持式测力计验证健康年轻成年人和老年人握力强度与年龄相关变化的能力。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 20;2020:6936879. doi: 10.1155/2020/6936879. eCollection 2020.
4
Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times?K力握力计在健康受试者中的可靠性和有效性:我们需要评估三次吗?
Hand Ther. 2023 Mar;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17589983231152958. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.手部握力监测: manoGraphy 系统与 Jamar 测力计。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1179-88. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2027-3. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.马丁握力计测量韩国成年人握力的可靠性和有效性。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):610-619. doi: 10.4055/cios23383. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years.50 岁以上社区居住成年人使用两种握力计的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 15;22(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03270-6.
8
Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years.采用高精度握力计对5至80岁健康受试者测量握力。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jun 10;16:139. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0612-4.
9
Measuring grip strength in older adults: comparing the grip-ball with the Jamar dynamometer.测量老年人的握力:握力球与贾马尔测力计的比较。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;38(3):148-53. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000034.
10
Prevalence of muscle weakness based on different diagnostic criteria in community-dwelling older adults: A comparison of grip strength dynamometers.基于不同诊断标准的社区居住老年人肌肉无力的患病率:握力测力计的比较。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Nov;17(11):2089-2095. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13027. Epub 2017 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Potential Moderating Factors on Absolute Test-Retest Reliability of Grip Strength Measurements in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.潜在调节因素对健康人群握力测量绝对重测信度的影响:一项Meta分析的系统评价
J Sports Sci Med. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):543-554. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2025.543. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Waist-Calf Circumference Ratio Is Associated with Body Composition, Physical Performance, and Muscle Strength in Older Women.腰臀围比与老年女性的身体成分、身体机能和肌肉力量相关。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;10(4):103. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics10040103.
3
Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of three different handgrip dynamometers (Jamar, Jamar Plus+ and Biodex) in healthy young adults.
三种不同握力计(Jamar、Jamar Plus+和Biodex)在健康年轻成年人中的重测信度和同时效度。
Hand Ther. 2025 Jul 5:17589983251352104. doi: 10.1177/17589983251352104.
4
Hand Size Reduces the Reliability of K-Force® Grip Dynamometer.手部大小会降低K-Force®握力计的可靠性。
Hand Ther. 2025 Jun 11:17589983251347238. doi: 10.1177/17589983251347238.
5
Commentary on "International norms for adult handgrip strength: A systematic review of data on 2.4 million adults aged 20 to 100+ years from 69 countries and regions".《成人握力国际规范:对来自69个国家和地区的240万年龄在20至100岁以上成年人数据的系统评价》述评
J Sport Health Sci. 2025 Apr 17;14:101042. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101042.
6
Reliability and validity of a full-body function Get-Up test in older adults.老年人全身功能起身测试的信度与效度
Geroscience. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01643-4.
7
Association between dynapenic obesity phenotypes and physical performance in middle-age and older women living in community.社区中老年女性中肌无力性肥胖表型与身体机能之间的关联
Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 25;11:1480284. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1480284. eCollection 2024.
8
The reliability of a Biometrics device as a tool for assessing hand grip and pinch strength, in a Polish cohort-A prospective observational study.一种生物识别设备评估波兰队列人群握力和捏力的可靠性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0303648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303648. eCollection 2024.
9
Are accelerometer-measured sitting and physical activity times associated with muscle mass and strength in healthy young adults in the UAE?在阿联酋,通过加速度计测量的久坐时间和身体活动时间与健康年轻成年人的肌肉质量和力量有关吗?
Heliyon. 2024 May 8;10(10):e30899. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30899. eCollection 2024 May 30.
10
Muscle activity and rehabilitation in spinal stenosis (MARSS) after conservative therapy and surgical decompression with or without fusion: Protocol for a partially randomized patient preference trial on rehabilitation timing.保守治疗以及有或无融合的手术减压后脊柱狭窄症的肌肉活动与康复(MARSS):一项关于康复时机的部分随机患者偏好试验方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 22;38:101273. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101273. eCollection 2024 Apr.