• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hand Size Reduces the Reliability of K-Force® Grip Dynamometer.手部大小会降低K-Force®握力计的可靠性。
Hand Ther. 2025 Jun 11:17589983251347238. doi: 10.1177/17589983251347238.
2
Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.两种握力计(Jamar® Plus 和 K-Force® Grip)在两种体位下测量握力的有效性、可靠性和重测研究。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022 Jun;41(3):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
Study of Reliability and Validity of the Load Cell-Type Hand Dynamometer Compared to the Jamar Dynamometer and the Number of Reliable Grip Strength Measurements.《研究与握力计相比,压力传感器型握力计的可靠性和有效性,以及可靠握力测量次数。》
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Oct;28(5):562-572. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500601. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
4
Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times?K力握力计在健康受试者中的可靠性和有效性:我们需要评估三次吗?
Hand Ther. 2023 Mar;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17589983231152958. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults.使用数字手持式测力计验证健康年轻成年人和老年人握力强度与年龄相关变化的能力。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 20;2020:6936879. doi: 10.1155/2020/6936879. eCollection 2020.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.马丁握力计测量韩国成年人握力的可靠性和有效性。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):610-619. doi: 10.4055/cios23383. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.Squegg®智能测力计与握力训练器和Jamar®液压式握力计之间的仪器间可靠性:一项初步研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Sep 1;77(5). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050099.
8
Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and jamar grip dynamometer.握力测量:血压计和 Jamar 握力计的效度和信度。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):215-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.215.
9
Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.手部握力监测: manoGraphy 系统与 Jamar 测力计。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1179-88. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2027-3. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
10
Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of Squegg™ - smart dynamometer and handgrip trainer in healthy individuals.Squegg™智能测力计和握力训练器在健康个体中的同时效度和重测信度。
Hand Ther. 2024 Jun;29(2):68-74. doi: 10.1177/17589983231223868. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Handgrip Strength Asymmetry in Female Basketball Players: The Critical Role of Arm Position and the Challenge of Statistical Power.女子篮球运动员握力不对称性:手臂位置的关键作用及统计功效的挑战
Sports (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;13(8):279. doi: 10.3390/sports13080279.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times?K力握力计在健康受试者中的可靠性和有效性:我们需要评估三次吗?
Hand Ther. 2023 Mar;28(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/17589983231152958. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
2
Interinstrument Reliability Between the Squegg® Smart Dynamometer and Hand Grip Trainer and the Jamar® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer: A Pilot Study.Squegg®智能测力计与握力训练器和Jamar®液压式握力计之间的仪器间可靠性:一项初步研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Sep 1;77(5). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050099.
3
Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar® Plus and K-Force® Grip.两种握力计(Jamar® Plus 和 K-Force® Grip)在两种体位下测量握力的有效性、可靠性和重测研究。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022 Jun;41(3):305-310. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review.握力的最小临床重要差异:一项系统评价
J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Jan;31(1):75-78. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
5
Comparison of Jamar and Bodygrip Dynamometers for Handgrip Strength Measurement.用于测量握力的贾马尔握力计和握力计的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1931-1940. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001666.
6
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Design and validation of the Grip-ball for measurement of hand grip strength.握力球的设计与验证:一种用于测量手掌握力的工具。
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Nov;34(9):1356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
8
A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach.握力测量在临床和流行病学研究中的评价:走向标准化方法。
Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.
9
What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable?什么使测量仪器具有有效性和可靠性?
Injury. 2011 Mar;42(3):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.042. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
10
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.COSMIN 研究就健康相关患者报告结局的测量属性的分类学、术语和定义达成了国际共识。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.

手部大小会降低K-Force®握力计的可靠性。

Hand Size Reduces the Reliability of K-Force® Grip Dynamometer.

作者信息

Karademir Feray, Uysal Özgün, Tüzen Tek Şule, Çakıryılmaz Esra Merve, Fırat Tüzün

机构信息

Faculty of Phyical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Hand Ther. 2025 Jun 11:17589983251347238. doi: 10.1177/17589983251347238.

DOI:10.1177/17589983251347238
PMID:40519966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12158969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Objective evaluation of grip strength is crucial for determining functional status of patients and demonstrating treatment effectiveness. A novel dynamometer, K-Force® Grip, has been developed that can work in conjunction with smart devices. However, the device has a smaller circumference compared to the Jamar®Plus+ and lacks an adjustable grip width, unlike the Jamar®Plus+. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the K-Force® Grip across different hand sizes in healthy subjects.

METHODS

We recruited 1 23 healthy subjects (n=246 hands) and categorized them based on hand length and span. Grip strength was measured using both the Jamar®Plus + hydraulic hand dynamometer and the K-Force® Grip dynamometer.

RESULTS

Inter-device consistency was excellent for the overall population (ICC=0.937) and for individuals with large hand spans and long hand lengths. It was good for other anthropometric groups. However, ICC estimates for absolute inter-device agreement indicated high variability and were unstable (as indicated by the confidence intervals including zero). BlandAltman plots suggest K-Force® values are systematically lower than those from the Jamar®Plus+.

CONCLUSION

The devices should not be used interchangeably in research settings. For clinical follow-up, the Jamar®Plus + dynamometer is recommended, especially in adolescent populations where hand growth continues over time.

摘要

背景

握力的客观评估对于确定患者的功能状态和证明治疗效果至关重要。一种新型测力计K-Force®握力计已被开发出来,它可以与智能设备配合使用。然而,与Jamar®Plus+相比,该设备的周长较小,并且与Jamar®Plus+不同,它缺乏可调节的握距。本研究的目的是评估K-Force®握力计在健康受试者不同手型中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

我们招募了123名健康受试者(n = 246只手),并根据手长和手宽对他们进行分类。使用Jamar®Plus +液压式握力计和K-Force®握力计测量握力。

结果

对于总体人群(ICC = 0.937)以及手宽较大和手长较长的个体,设备间的一致性非常好。对于其他人体测量组,一致性良好。然而,设备间绝对一致性的ICC估计显示出高变异性且不稳定(置信区间包括零表明了这一点)。Bland-Altman图表明K-Force®的值系统性地低于Jamar®Plus+的值。

结论

在研究环境中,这些设备不应互换使用。对于临床随访,建议使用Jamar®Plus +握力计,特别是在手部仍在生长的青少年人群中。