• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗顾虑量表(VaCCS)的编制及信效度检验。

The Vaccination Concerns in COVID-19 Scale (VaCCS): Development and validation.

机构信息

School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0264784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264784. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0264784
PMID:35286331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8920277/
Abstract

Vaccines are highly effective in minimizing serious cases of COVID-19 and pivotal to managing the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite widespread availability, vaccination rates fall short of levels required to bring about widespread immunity, with low rates attributed to vaccine hesitancy. It is therefore important to identify the beliefs and concerns associated with vaccine intentions and uptake. The present study aimed to develop and validate, using the AMEE Guide, the Vaccination Concerns in COVID-19 Scale (VaCCS), a comprehensive measure of beliefs and concerns with respect to COVID-19 vaccines. In the scale development phase, samples of Australian (N = 53) and USA (N = 48) residents completed an initial open-response survey to elicit beliefs and concerns about COVID-19 vaccines. A concurrent rapid literature review was conducted to identify content from existing scales on vaccination beliefs. An initial pool of items was developed informed by the survey responses and rapid review. The readability and face validity of the item pool was assessed by behavioral science experts (N = 5) and non-experts (N = 10). In the scale validation phase, samples of Australian (N = 522) and USA (N = 499) residents completed scaled versions of the final item pool and measures of socio-political, health beliefs and outcomes, and trait measures. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a scale comprising 35 items with 8 subscales, and subsequent confirmatory factor analyses indicated acceptable fit of the scale structure with the data in each sample and factorial invariance across samples. Concurrent and predictive validity tests indicated a theoretically and conceptually predictable pattern of relations between the VaCCS subscales with the socio-political, health beliefs and outcomes, and trait measures, and key subscales predicted intentions to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The VaCCS provides a novel measure to assess beliefs and concerns toward COVID-19 vaccination that researchers and practitioners can use in its entirety or select specific sub-scales to use according to their needs.

摘要

疫苗在最大限度减少 COVID-19 重症病例方面非常有效,是管理 COVID-19 大流行的关键。尽管疫苗广泛可用,但接种率仍未达到实现广泛免疫力所需的水平,而低接种率归因于疫苗犹豫。因此,重要的是要确定与疫苗接种意愿和接种有关的信念和关注点。本研究旨在使用 AMEE 指南开发和验证 COVID-19 疫苗关注量表(VaCCS),该量表全面衡量了对 COVID-19 疫苗的信念和关注点。在量表开发阶段,澳大利亚(N=53)和美国(N=48)居民样本完成了一项初步的开放性反应调查,以了解他们对 COVID-19 疫苗的信念和担忧。同时进行了快速文献综述,以确定现有疫苗接种信念量表中的内容。初始项目池是根据调查结果和快速审查开发的。行为科学专家(N=5)和非专家(N=10)评估了项目池的可读性和表面有效性。在量表验证阶段,澳大利亚(N=522)和美国(N=499)居民样本完成了最终项目池的量表版本以及社会政治、健康信念和结果以及特质测量。探索性因素分析得出了一个由 35 个项目组成的量表,包含 8 个亚量表,随后的验证性因素分析表明,在每个样本中,量表结构与数据的拟合良好,并且在样本之间具有因子不变性。同时和预测有效性测试表明,VaCCS 亚量表与社会政治、健康信念和结果以及特质测量之间存在理论上和概念上可预测的关系模式,关键亚量表预测了接种 COVID-19 疫苗的意愿。VaCCS 提供了一种评估对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的信念和担忧的新方法,研究人员和从业者可以根据自己的需要全部或选择特定的子量表来使用。

相似文献

1
The Vaccination Concerns in COVID-19 Scale (VaCCS): Development and validation.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗顾虑量表(VaCCS)的编制及信效度检验。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0264784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264784. eCollection 2022.
2
Oxford Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (OVHS): a UK-based and US-based online mixed-methods psychometric development and validation study of an instrument to assess vaccine hesitancy.牛津疫苗犹豫量表(OVHS):一项基于英国和美国的在线混合方法心理测量学发展和验证研究,旨在评估疫苗犹豫的工具。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 9;14(10):e084669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084669.
3
Development and validation of the COVID-19 vaccine beliefs scale for the Chinese population.开发并验证针对中国人群的 COVID-19 疫苗信念量表。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):2467. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19928-2.
4
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
5
Changes in general and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among U.S. adults from 2021 to 2022.2021 年至 2022 年美国成年人对一般疫苗和 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的变化。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2357230. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2357230. Epub 2024 May 30.
6
Development of a vaccine hesitancy scale for childhood immunization in China.中国儿童疫苗犹豫量表的制定。
Vaccine. 2023 Nov 2;41(46):6870-6877. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.09.057. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Chinese Population: A Large-Scale National Study.中国民众对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:一项大规模的全国性研究。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 29;12:781161. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.781161. eCollection 2021.
8
COVID-19 vaccination communication: Effects of vaccine conspiracy beliefs and message framing among black and white participants.COVID-19 疫苗接种传播:疫苗阴谋论信仰和信息框架对白人和黑人参与者的影响。
Vaccine. 2024 May 10;42(13):3197-3205. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
College students' COVID-19 vaccine beliefs and intentions: Implications for interventions.大学生对 COVID-19 疫苗的信念和意愿:对干预措施的启示。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 May-Jun;72(4):989-994. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2065205. Epub 2022 May 27.
10
Latinx youth's and parents' covid-19 beliefs, vaccine hesitancy and vaccination rates: Longitudinal associations in a community sample.拉丁裔青少年和家长对新冠病毒的信念、疫苗犹豫和接种率:社区样本中的纵向关联。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 24;19(7):e0307479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307479. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric validation of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale in German pre-pandemic and mid-pandemic samples.德国疫情前和疫情中期样本中疫苗接种态度测验(VAX)量表的心理测量学验证
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 18;14(1):30543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82726-8.
2
Factors Associated with Parents' COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions for Their Children in an Economically Marginalized, Diverse Community.经济边缘化、多样化社区中与父母为子女做出新冠疫苗接种决策相关的因素
J Community Health. 2025 Apr;50(2):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01404-y. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
How to distinguish climate sceptics, antivaxxers, and persistent sceptics: Evidence from a multi-country survey of public attitudes.如何区分气候怀疑论者、反疫苗接种者和顽固怀疑论者:来自多国公众态度调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 2;19(10):e0310325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310325. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and validation of the COVID-19 vaccine beliefs scale for the Chinese population.开发并验证针对中国人群的 COVID-19 疫苗信念量表。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):2467. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19928-2.
5
The Vaccination Fear Scale (VFS-6): Adaptation, Cross-Cultural Validation, and Invariance among Genders and Six Different Cultures, Applying Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT).疫苗接种恐惧量表(VFS - 6):采用经典测验理论(CTT)和项目反应理论(IRT)在六种不同文化及不同性别群体中的适应性、跨文化验证与恒等性研究
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 24;14(4):808-822. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14040052.
6
How do people with long COVID utilize COVID-19 vaccination and rehabilitation services and what are their experiences with these services? results of a qualitative study with 48 participants from Germany.长新冠患者如何利用新冠疫苗接种和康复服务,以及他们对这些服务的体验如何?一项来自德国的 48 名参与者的定性研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):915. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18380-6.
7
Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM).政府信任度量表(TGM)的开发与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):2023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0.
8
An online RCT on behavioural expectations effects of COVID-19 certification policies in England.一项关于英国新冠病毒认证政策行为预期效果的在线随机对照试验。
Vaccine X. 2023 Sep 20;15:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100389. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Factors Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccination Status of Higher Education Students: Results of an Online Cross-Sectional Survey at Six Universities in Southwestern Germany.与德国西南部六所大学高等教育学生新冠疫苗接种状况相关的因素:一项在线横断面调查结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;10(9):1433. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091433.
10
Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Fear of Coronavirus Vaccination Scale in the Prospective Study among a Representative Sample of Polish, Israeli, Slovenian, and German Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对来自波兰、以色列、斯洛文尼亚和德国的代表性成年人样本进行前瞻性研究中,对冠状病毒疫苗接种恐惧量表进行调整和初步验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):11587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811587.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior.生物武器还是骗局?关于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发和大流行行为的不同阴谋论之间的联系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.
2
The populist hotbed: How political attitudes, resentment, and justice beliefs predict both exposure to and avoidance of specific populist news features in the United States.民粹主义温床:政治态度、怨恨和正义信念如何预测美国民众对特定民粹主义新闻特征的接触和回避。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0258220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258220. eCollection 2021.
3
Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions and attitudes in France.法国与 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿和态度相关的因素。
Public Health. 2021 Sep;198:200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.035. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
4
Predicting physical distancing over time during COVID-19: testing an integrated model.预测新冠疫情期间随时间变化的身体距离:测试一个综合模型。
Psychol Health. 2022 Dec;37(12):1436-1456. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1968397. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Predictors of Vaccine Hesitancy: Implications for COVID-19 Public Health Messaging.疫苗犹豫的预测因素:对 COVID-19 公共卫生信息传递的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 29;18(15):8054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158054.
6
Lack of Trust, Conspiracy Beliefs, and Social Media Use Predict COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy.缺乏信任、阴谋论信念和社交媒体使用可预测新冠疫苗犹豫情况。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 3;9(6):593. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060593.
7
Quantifying COVID-19 Content in the Online Health Opinion War Using Machine Learning.利用机器学习量化在线健康舆论战中的新冠疫情相关内容
IEEE Access. 2020 May 11;8:91886-91893. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993967. eCollection 2020.
8
Political ideology and vaccination willingness: implications for policy design.政治意识形态与疫苗接种意愿:对政策设计的影响
Policy Sci. 2021;54(3):477-491. doi: 10.1007/s11077-021-09428-0. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
Injection fears and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.注射恐惧和对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。
Psychol Med. 2023 Mar;53(4):1185-1195. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002609. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
10
COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence.COVID-19 疫苗谣言和阴谋论:需要进行认知免疫接种以抵制错误信息,提高疫苗接种率。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251605. eCollection 2021.