Department of Anthropology & Sociology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, 28723, NC, USA.
Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA.
Health Place. 2022 May;75:102775. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102775. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Unhealthy food environments are disproportionally concentrated in neighborhoods with clustering of racial/ethnic minorities and poverty. This disparity has been blamed, in part, on market self-regulation. This explanation risks overlooking past and current practices of racial segregation that have created and reinforced the obstacles blocking investments from food retailers in marginalized neighborhoods. We fill this gap by investigating how the long-term ramifications of redlining, discriminatory housing practices enacted by federal Home Owner Lending Corporation (HOLC) in the 1930s, has evolved generations later to disproportionally exposing neighborhoods to unhealthy food environments.
We overlaid historical redlining maps over 2010 food environment observations at the census tract level to identify areas with less healthy food environments and to assess the historical context of those areas. For 11,651 census tracts within 102 U.S. urban areas, we described the healthiness of food environments as measured by the modified retail food environment index (mRFEI). Using hurdle models with random effects, we further examined the association between redlining housing practice and food environments.
The results indicate that historically redlined neighborhoods show a higher likelihood for unhealthy retail food environments even for census tracts with present-day economic and racial privilege.
The current evidence shows how structural discrimination manifested by unjust housing practices and racial residential segregation fueled an uneven food environment where minority neighborhoods disproportionally bore the brunt of restrictive food access. It highlights an urgent need to ameliorate patterns of housing inequality as a fix to unequal food environments.
不健康的食品环境在聚居着少数族裔和贫困人口的社区中不成比例地集中。这种差异部分归咎于市场自我监管。这种解释可能忽略了过去和当前的种族隔离做法,这些做法造成并加剧了阻碍食品零售商在边缘化社区投资的障碍。我们通过调查 30 年代联邦住房贷款公司(HOLC)实施的歧视性住房政策的长期后果,如何在几代人之后导致这些社区面临不成比例的不健康食品环境,来填补这一空白。
我们将历史上的红线地图与 2010 年按普查区划分的食品环境观测结果叠加,以确定食品环境较差的地区,并评估这些地区的历史背景。在美国 102 个城市地区的 11651 个普查区内,我们根据改良零售食品环境指数(mRFEI)来描述食品环境的健康程度。我们使用具有随机效应的障碍模型,进一步研究了红线住房实践与食品环境之间的关联。
结果表明,即使对于当今经济和种族特权的普查区,历史上被划红线的社区也更有可能出现不健康的零售食品环境。
现有证据表明,不公正的住房做法和种族居住隔离所表现出的结构性歧视如何加剧了不平等的食品环境,少数族裔社区首当其冲地受到限制获得食品的影响。它强调迫切需要改善住房不平等模式,以解决不平等的食品环境问题。