• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对历史街区红线划定与当代健康结果的系统评价。

A systematic review of historic neighborhood redlining and contemporary health outcomes.

作者信息

Bauer S J, Spoer B R, Ehrman R, Nnodim Opara I, Wei H, Ellendula R S, Haidar A H, Hardeman M, Levy P D, Korzeniewski S J

机构信息

Integrative Biosciences Center, Wayne State University, 6135 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 3939 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.

Department of Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022. Epub 2024 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022
PMID:39673836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11741925/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Historic redlining grades that were assigned to US neighborhoods based largely on minority race or ethnicity by the Home Owners Loan Corporation (HOLC) during the 1930s have been linked with adverse health outcomes among neighborhood residents. This review aimed to summarize the quantitative evidence, so we could determine if any findings are replicated and otherwise identify research gaps.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review by searching the PubMed® MEDLINE database for observational studies that reported on health outcomes among people who resided in neighborhoods that were assigned HOLC grades. We assessed quality by allocating points based on whether studies reported the sample size or count of people affected by outcomes (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points), and whether unadjusted magnitudes of association were reported alongside adjusted estimates (yes = 1 point, no = 2 points). The sum score was used to classify each study as high (2 points), average (3 points) or low quality (4 points).

RESULTS

Among the 89 articles identified, 32 met inclusion criteria; 15 were deemed high-quality. The most frequently studied health conditions in order of descending frequency were: i) injury or violence (n = 8), ii) cancer (n = 7), iii) cardiometabolic (n = 6), iv) perinatal (n = 5), v) asthma (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

People who lived in areas with less desirable HOLC grades tended to suffer higher than expected rates of injury or violence, asthma, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and some cardiometabolic disorders; associations with cancer were mostly null. Methodological differences limited opportunities for direct comparison across studies, and there was significant heterogeneity among the few estimates that were generally comparable. While robust data are lacking, the limited existing evidence supports a possible association between historically redlined areas and heightened risk of adverse health outcomes. Why this association may exist remains unknown.

摘要

目的

20世纪30年代,美国房主贷款公司(HOLC)主要根据少数族裔种族或族裔对美国社区划定的历史红线等级,已与社区居民的不良健康结果相关联。本综述旨在总结定量证据,以便我们确定是否有任何研究结果得到重复,并识别其他研究空白。

研究设计

系统综述。

方法

我们通过检索PubMed® MEDLINE数据库进行系统综述,以查找关于居住在被划定HOLC等级社区的人群健康结果的观察性研究。我们根据研究是否报告受结果影响人群的样本量或数量(是 = 1分,否 = 2分)以及是否在调整估计值的同时报告未调整的关联强度(是 = 1分,否 = 2分)来分配分数,以此评估质量。总分用于将每项研究分类为高质量(2分)、中等质量(3分)或低质量(4分)。

结果

在识别出的89篇文章中,32篇符合纳入标准;15篇被认为是高质量的。按频率从高到低排列,最常研究的健康状况依次为:i)伤害或暴力(n = 8),ii)癌症(n = 7),iii)心脏代谢疾病(n = 6),iv)围产期疾病(n = 5),v)哮喘(n = 2)。

结论

居住在HOLC等级较差地区的人群往往遭受高于预期的伤害或暴力、哮喘、不良妊娠结局以及某些心脏代谢疾病发生率;与癌症的关联大多为无关联。方法学差异限制了跨研究直接比较的机会,并且在少数通常具有可比性的估计值之间存在显著异质性。虽然缺乏有力数据,但现有有限证据支持历史上被划定红线的地区与不良健康结果风险增加之间可能存在关联。这种关联为何存在尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/851fefd44391/nihms-2041821-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/c253369e4f5e/nihms-2041821-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/c0743a48e2bd/nihms-2041821-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/851fefd44391/nihms-2041821-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/c253369e4f5e/nihms-2041821-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/c0743a48e2bd/nihms-2041821-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3444/11741925/851fefd44391/nihms-2041821-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of historic neighborhood redlining and contemporary health outcomes.对历史街区红线划定与当代健康结果的系统评价。
Public Health. 2025 Jan;238:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.10.022. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.为改善孕产妇和新生儿结局而激励女性增加产前检查的使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;2015(12):CD009916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Antioxidants for female subfertility.用于女性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 5(8):CD007807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub2.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between 1930s HOLC grades and estimated population burden of cardiovascular disease risk factors in 2020.20世纪30年代住房贷款银行委员会(HOLC)评级与2020年心血管疾病风险因素估计人口负担之间的关联。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 9;3(8):pgae301. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae301. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Association Between Historical Redlining and Access to High-Volume Hospitals Among Patients Undergoing Complex Cancer Surgery in California.加利福尼亚州接受复杂癌症手术的患者中,历史上的红线政策与获得高容量医院之间的关联。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1477-1487. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14679-7. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Residential Redlining, Neighborhood Trajectory, and Equity of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Care.
住宅红线、社区轨迹与乳腺癌和结直肠癌治疗公平性。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 1;279(6):1054-1061. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006156. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
Historical redlining is associated with increasing geographical disparities in bird biodiversity sampling in the United States.历史上的红线划定与美国鸟类生物多样性采样的地理差异不断扩大有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1869-1877. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Historical Neighborhood Redlining and Contemporary Environmental Racism.历史上的社区红线划定与当代环境种族主义。
Local Environ. 2023;28(4):518-528. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2022.2155942. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
6
Changes in Socioeconomic Disparities for Traffic-Related Air Pollution Exposure During Pregnancy Over a 20-Year Period in Texas.德克萨斯州 20 年来与交通相关的空气污染暴露的社会经济差异变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328012. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28012.
7
Association Between Redlining and Spatial Access to Pharmacies.红线划定与药店空间可达性之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327315. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27315.
8
Historical Redlining, Socioeconomic Distress, and Risk of Heart Failure Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的历史红线划定、社会经济困境与心力衰竭风险。
Circulation. 2023 Jul 18;148(3):210-219. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064351. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
9
Historical Neighborhood Redlining and Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病患者的历史社区红线划定与心血管风险
Circulation. 2023 Jul 18;148(3):280-282. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064215. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
10
Association Between Historical Neighborhood Redlining and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Veterans With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.历史邻里红线与美国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病退伍军人心血管结局的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322727. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22727.