Emergency Department, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China.
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1875-1883. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13893. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
Norepinephrine is recommended as a first-line vasopressor agent in the haemodynamic stabilization of cardiogenic shock. The survival benefit of norepinephrine therapy has not been demonstrated in clinical practice, however. This study aimed to explore the relationship between norepinephrine use and outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients in real-world conditions.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Cardiogenic shock patients were enrolled and categorized into a norepinephrine group or a non-norepinephrine group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounders. Cox proportional-hazards models and multivariable logistic regression were used to investigate the relationship between norepinephrine treatment and mortality. A total of 927 eligible patients were included: 552 patients in the norepinephrine group and 375 patients in the non-norepinephrine group. After PSM, 222 cases from each group were matched using a 1:1 matching algorithm. Thirty day mortality for patients treated with norepinephrine was significantly higher than for those in the non-norepinephrine group (41% vs. 30%, OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.39, P = 0.017; HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.06, P = 0.013). In the multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between norepinephrine therapy and long-term (90 day, 180 day, or 1 year) mortality (90 day (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82-1.74, P = 0.363), 180 day (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80-1.70, P = 0.418), 1 year (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79-1.66, P = 0.477). Patients in the norepinephrine group required more mechanical ventilation (84% vs. 67%, OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.70-4.25, P < 0.001) and experienced longer ICU stays (median 7 vs. 4 days, OR 7.92, 95% CI 1.40-44.83, P = 0.020) than non-norepinephrine group.
Cardiogenic shock patients treated with norepinephrine were associated with significantly increased short-term mortality, while no significant difference was found on long-term survival rates. Future trials are needed to validate and explore this association.
去甲肾上腺素被推荐作为心源性休克患者血流动力学稳定的一线血管加压药。然而,去甲肾上腺素治疗的生存获益在临床实践中尚未得到证实。本研究旨在探讨去甲肾上腺素使用与真实世界条件下心源性休克患者结局之间的关系。
我们基于医疗信息重症监护 III 数据库(MIMIC-III)进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入心源性休克患者,并分为去甲肾上腺素组或非去甲肾上腺素组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)控制混杂因素。使用 Cox 比例风险模型和多变量逻辑回归探讨去甲肾上腺素治疗与死亡率之间的关系。共纳入 927 例符合条件的患者:去甲肾上腺素组 552 例,非去甲肾上腺素组 375 例。PSM 后,采用 1:1 匹配算法对每组 222 例进行匹配。接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的患者 30 天死亡率明显高于非去甲肾上腺素组(41% vs. 30%,OR 1.61,95%CI 1.09-2.39,P=0.017;HR 1.50,95%CI 1.09-2.06,P=0.013)。多变量分析显示,去甲肾上腺素治疗与长期(90 天、180 天或 1 年)死亡率之间无显著差异(90 天(OR 1.19,95%CI 0.82-1.74,P=0.363),180 天(OR 1.17,95%CI 0.80-1.70,P=0.418),1 年(OR 1.14,95%CI 0.79-1.66,P=0.477)。去甲肾上腺素组患者需要更多的机械通气(84% vs. 67%,OR 2.67,95%CI 1.70-4.25,P<0.001)和更长的 ICU 住院时间(中位数 7 天 vs. 4 天,OR 7.92,95%CI 1.40-44.83,P=0.020)。
接受去甲肾上腺素治疗的心源性休克患者短期死亡率显著增加,而长期生存率无显著差异。需要进一步的试验来验证和探讨这种关联。