• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测重症监护患者死亡率、延长住院时间和30天再入院率的可解释时间序列深度学习模型。

Explainable time-series deep learning models for the prediction of mortality, prolonged length of stay and 30-day readmission in intensive care patients.

作者信息

Deng Yuhan, Liu Shuang, Wang Ziyao, Wang Yuxin, Jiang Yong, Liu Baohua

机构信息

School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;9:933037. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.933037. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.933037
PMID:36250092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9554013/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission are common outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). Traditional scoring systems and machine learning models for predicting these outcomes usually ignore the characteristics of ICU data, which are time-series forms. We aimed to use time-series deep learning models with the selective combination of three widely used scoring systems to predict these outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 40,083 patients in ICU from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Three deep learning models, namely, recurrent neural network (RNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and long short-term memory (LSTM) with attention mechanisms, were trained for the prediction of in-hospital mortality, prolonged LOS, and 30-day readmission with variables collected during the initial 24 h after ICU admission or the last 24 h before discharge. The inclusion of variables was based on three widely used scoring systems, namely, APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II, and the predictors consisted of time-series vital signs, laboratory tests, medication, and procedures. The patients were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%), which were used for model development and model evaluation, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Brier scores were used to evaluate model performance. Variable significance was identified through attention mechanisms.

RESULTS

A total of 33 variables for 40,083 patients were enrolled for mortality and prolonged LOS prediction and 36,180 for readmission prediction. The rates of occurrence of the three outcomes were 9.74%, 27.54%, and 11.79%, respectively. In each of the three outcomes, the performance of RNN, GRU, and LSTM did not differ greatly. Mortality prediction models, prolonged LOS prediction models, and readmission prediction models achieved AUCs of 0.870 ± 0.001, 0.765 ± 0.003, and 0.635 ± 0.018, respectively. The top significant variables co-selected by the three deep learning models were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), age, blood urea nitrogen, and norepinephrine for mortality; GCS, invasive ventilation, and blood urea nitrogen for prolonged LOS; and blood urea nitrogen, GCS, and ethnicity for readmission.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic prediction models established in our study achieved good performance in predicting common outcomes of patients in ICU, especially in mortality prediction. In addition, GCS and blood urea nitrogen were identified as the most important factors strongly associated with adverse ICU events.

摘要

背景

院内死亡率、住院时间延长(LOS)和30天再入院是重症监护病房(ICU)常见的结局。用于预测这些结局的传统评分系统和机器学习模型通常忽略了ICU数据的特征,这些数据是时间序列形式的。我们旨在使用时间序列深度学习模型,并选择性地结合三种广泛使用的评分系统来预测这些结局。

材料与方法

对医学重症监护信息数据库-IV(MIMIC-IV)中40,083例ICU患者进行回顾性队列研究。训练了三种深度学习模型,即具有注意力机制的递归神经网络(RNN)、门控递归单元(GRU)和长短期记忆(LSTM),以预测ICU入院后最初24小时或出院前最后24小时收集的变量的院内死亡率、住院时间延长和30天再入院情况。变量的纳入基于三种广泛使用的评分系统,即急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II),预测因素包括时间序列生命体征、实验室检查、用药和操作。患者被随机分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%),分别用于模型开发和模型评估。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和布里尔评分来评估模型性能。通过注意力机制确定变量的重要性。

结果

共纳入40,083例患者的33个变量用于死亡率和住院时间延长预测,36,180个变量用于再入院预测。三种结局的发生率分别为9.74%、27.54%和11.79%。在三种结局中,RNN、GRU和LSTM的性能差异不大。死亡率预测模型、住院时间延长预测模型和再入院预测模型的AUC分别为0.870±0.001、0.765±0.003和0.635±0.018。三种深度学习模型共同选择的最重要变量为:死亡率方面,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、年龄、血尿素氮和去甲肾上腺素;住院时间延长方面,GCS、有创通气和血尿素氮;再入院方面,血尿素氮、GCS和种族。

结论

我们研究中建立的预后预测模型在预测ICU患者常见结局方面表现良好,尤其是在死亡率预测方面。此外,GCS和血尿素氮被确定为与不良ICU事件密切相关的最重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/250bf68ea79a/fmed-09-933037-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/3657c94280a7/fmed-09-933037-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/1423ce8e76fe/fmed-09-933037-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/a635c2a24191/fmed-09-933037-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/80eacdcd9547/fmed-09-933037-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/f4f018b46c7a/fmed-09-933037-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/250bf68ea79a/fmed-09-933037-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/3657c94280a7/fmed-09-933037-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/1423ce8e76fe/fmed-09-933037-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/a635c2a24191/fmed-09-933037-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/80eacdcd9547/fmed-09-933037-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/f4f018b46c7a/fmed-09-933037-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0a9/9554013/250bf68ea79a/fmed-09-933037-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Explainable time-series deep learning models for the prediction of mortality, prolonged length of stay and 30-day readmission in intensive care patients.用于预测重症监护患者死亡率、延长住院时间和30天再入院率的可解释时间序列深度学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;9:933037. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.933037. eCollection 2022.
2
Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Septic Patients Requiring Intensive Care Unit Readmission.用于预测需要再次入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Aug;11(4):1695-1713. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00671-3. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
[Long short-term memory and Logistic regression for mortality risk prediction of intensive care unit patients with stroke].[基于长短期记忆网络和逻辑回归的重症监护病房中风患者死亡风险预测]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Jun 18;54(3):458-467. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.010.
4
[Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay machine learning].[预测重症监护病房长期住院时间 机器学习]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Dec 18;53(6):1163-1170. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.026.
5
[Prediction of intensive care unit readmission for critically ill patients based on ensemble learning].基于集成学习的危重症患者重症监护病房再入院预测
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jun 18;53(3):566-572. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.021.
6
Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Analyses of the MIMIC-III Database.机械通气患者的机器学习预测模型:对MIMIC-III数据库的分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 1;8:662340. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.662340. eCollection 2021.
7
ICURE: Intensive care unit (ICU) risk evaluation for 30-day mortality. Developing and evaluating a multivariable machine learning prediction model for patients admitted to the general ICU in Sweden.ICURE:30 天死亡率的重症监护病房(ICU)风险评估。在瑞典,针对普通 ICU 收治的患者,开发和评估一个多变量机器学习预测模型。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Nov;68(10):1379-1389. doi: 10.1111/aas.14501. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
8
Mortality prediction by SOFA score in ICU-patients after cardiac surgery; comparison with traditional prognostic-models.心脏手术后重症监护病房患者中序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对死亡率的预测;与传统预后模型的比较
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 13;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00975-2.
9
Predicting six-month mortality of patients with traumatic brain injury: usefulness of common intensive care severity scores.预测创伤性脑损伤患者的六个月死亡率:常见重症监护严重程度评分的效用
Crit Care. 2014 Apr 3;18(2):R60. doi: 10.1186/cc13814.
10
Performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II for Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients in Intensive Care Unit.序贯器官衰竭评估和简化急性生理学评分II在重症监护病房心脏手术后患者中的应用效果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 6;8:774935. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.774935. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling in-hospital length of stay: A comparison of linear and ensemble models for competing risk analysis.住院时长建模:用于竞争风险分析的线性模型与集成模型比较
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0322101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322101. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of Multiservice Machine Learning Models to Predict Postsurgical Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition at the Time of Case Posting.开发多服务机器学习模型以预测病例发布时的术后住院时间和出院处置情况。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Jan 31;6(1):e547. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000547. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Transformer-based model for predicting length of stay in intensive care unit in sepsis patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Prediction of Disease Outcomes for COVID-19 and Pneumonia Patients.统计分析和机器学习预测 COVID-19 和肺炎患者的疾病结局。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Apr 19;12:838749. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.838749. eCollection 2022.
2
Factors Associated with In-Patient Mortality in the Rapid Assessment of Adult Earthquake Trauma Patients.与成人地震创伤患者快速评估中住院患者死亡率相关的因素。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Jun;37(3):299-305. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000693. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
Epidemiology and age-related mortality in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection or sepsis: an international cohort study.
基于Transformer的脓毒症患者重症监护病房住院时间预测模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 7;11:1473533. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1473533. eCollection 2024.
4
Survival models and longitudinal medical events for hospital readmission forecasting.用于预测医院再入院的生存模型和纵向医疗事件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1394. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11771-w.
5
Predicting ICU Readmission from Electronic Health Records via BERTopic with Long Short Term Memory Network Approach.通过带有长短期记忆网络方法的BERTopic从电子健康记录预测重症监护病房再入院情况。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 18;13(18):5503. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185503.
6
Can Attention Be Used to Explain EHR-Based Mortality Prediction Tasks: A Case Study on Hemorrhagic Stroke.注意力能否用于解释基于电子健康记录的死亡率预测任务:以出血性中风为例的研究
ACM BCB. 2023 Sep;2023. doi: 10.1145/3584371.3613002. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
7
Clinical nomogram prediction model to assess the risk of prolonged ICU length of stay in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a retrospective analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.基于 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性分析:用于评估糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者 ICU 住院时间延长风险的临床列线图预测模型。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02467-z.
8
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with nonhip femoral fractures.建立并验证预测非髋部股骨骨折患者院内死亡率的列线图。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Nov 24;28(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01515-7.
9
A comparison of random survival forest and Cox regression for prediction of mortality in patients with hemorrhagic stroke.随机生存森林与 Cox 回归在预测出血性脑卒中患者死亡率中的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02293-2.
10
A risk nomogram for predicting prolonged intensive care unit stays in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.一种用于预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者重症监护病房延长住院时间的风险列线图。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 6;10:1177786. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1177786. eCollection 2023.
危重症腹腔感染或脓毒症患者的流行病学和年龄相关死亡率:一项国际队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022 Jul;60(1):106591. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106591. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
XGBoost Machine Learning Algorism Performed Better Than Regression Models in Predicting Mortality of Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.XGBoost 机器学习算法在预测中重度创伤性脑损伤死亡率方面的表现优于回归模型。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;163:e617-e622. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.044. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Identifying prognostic factors for clinical outcomes and costs in four high-volume surgical treatments using routinely collected hospital data.利用常规收集的医院数据,确定四种高容量手术治疗的临床结局和成本的预后因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 7;12(1):5902. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09972-6.
6
Blood urea nitrogen - independent marker of mortality in sepsis.血尿素氮 - 脓毒症死亡率的独立标志物。
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2023 Mar;167(1):24-29. doi: 10.5507/bp.2022.015. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Norepinephrine use in cardiogenic shock patients is associated with increased 30 day mortality.去甲肾上腺素在心源休克患者中的应用与 30 天死亡率的增加相关。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1875-1883. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13893. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.重症监护后综合征
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Mar 1;31(2):145. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022899.
9
Clinical and laboratory predictors at ICU admission affecting course of illness and mortality rates in a tertiary COVID-19 center.入住 ICU 时的临床和实验室预测因素对三级 COVID-19 中心疾病进程和死亡率的影响。
Heart Lung. 2022 May-Jun;53:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Using Machine Learning to Predict Mortality for COVID-19 Patients on Day 0 in the ICU.利用机器学习预测ICU中COVID-19患者第0天的死亡率。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Jan 13;3:681608. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.681608. eCollection 2021.