• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右心室评估能否改善低危肺栓塞的分诊?

Can right ventricular assessments improve triaging of low risk pulmonary embolism?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

Jaron D. RaperDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;29(7):835-850. doi: 10.1111/acem.14484. Epub 2022 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1111/acem.14484
PMID:35289978
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Identifying right ventricle (RV) abnormalities is important to stratifying pulmonary embolism (PE) severity. Disposition decisions are influenced by concerns about early deterioration. Triaging strategies, like the Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI), do not include RV assessments as predictors or early deterioration as outcome(s). We aimed to (1) determine if RV assessment variables add prognostic accuracy for 5-day clinical deterioration in patients classified low risk by sPESI, and (2) determine the prognostic importance of RV assessments compared to other variables and to each other.

METHODS

We identified low risk sPESI patients (sPESI = 0) from a prospective PE registry. From a large field of candidate variables, we developed, and compared prognostic accuracy of, full and reduced random forest models (with and without RV assessment variables, respectively) on a validation database. We reported variable importance plots from full random forest and provided odds ratios for statistical inference of importance from multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes were death, cardiac arrest, hypotension, dysrhythmia, or respiratory failure within 5 days of PE.

RESULTS

Of 1736 patients, 610 (35.1%) were low risk by sPESI and 72 (11.8%) experienced early deterioration. Of the 610, RV abnormality was present in 157 (25.7%) by CT, 121 (19.8%) by echocardiography, 132 (21.6%) by natriuretic peptide, and 107 (17.5%) by troponin. For deterioration, the receiver operating characteristics for full and reduced random forest prognostic models were 0.80 (0.77-0.82) and 0.71 (0.68-0.73), respectively. RV assessments were the top four in the variable importance plot for the random forest model. Echocardiography and CT significantly increased predicted probability of 5-day clinical deterioration by the multivariable logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

A PE triaging strategy with RV imaging assessments had superior prognostic performance at classifying low risk for 5-day clinical deterioration versus one without.

摘要

目的

识别右心室(RV)异常对于分层肺栓塞(PE)的严重程度很重要。处置决策受到对早期恶化的担忧的影响。分诊策略,如简化肺栓塞严重指数(sPESI),并未将 RV 评估作为预测因素或早期恶化作为结局。我们的目的是:(1)确定 RV 评估变量是否为 sPESI 分类低危患者 5 天临床恶化的预后准确性,以及(2)确定 RV 评估与其他变量和彼此相比的预后重要性。

方法

我们从前瞻性 PE 登记处确定了 sPESI 低危患者(sPESI=0)。从大量候选变量中,我们开发了全和简化随机森林模型(分别具有和不具有 RV 评估变量),并在验证数据库上比较了其预后准确性。我们报告了全随机森林的变量重要性图,并提供了多变量逻辑回归的重要性统计推断的优势比。结局为 PE 后 5 天内死亡、心脏骤停、低血压、心律失常或呼吸衰竭。

结果

在 1736 例患者中,610 例(35.1%)根据 sPESI 为低危,72 例(11.8%)发生早期恶化。在这 610 例患者中,CT 显示 RV 异常 157 例(25.7%),超声心动图显示 121 例(19.8%),利钠肽显示 132 例(21.6%),肌钙蛋白显示 107 例(17.5%)。对于恶化,全和简化随机森林预后模型的接收者操作特征分别为 0.80(0.77-0.82)和 0.71(0.68-0.73)。RV 评估在随机森林模型的变量重要性图中排名前四。超声心动图和 CT 通过多变量逻辑回归显著增加了 5 天临床恶化的预测概率。

结论

与不使用 RV 成像评估的策略相比,具有 RV 成像评估的 PE 分诊策略在分类低危患者 5 天临床恶化方面具有更好的预后性能。

相似文献

1
Can right ventricular assessments improve triaging of low risk pulmonary embolism?右心室评估能否改善低危肺栓塞的分诊?
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Jul;29(7):835-850. doi: 10.1111/acem.14484. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic tool: Pulmonary embolism short-term clinical outcomes risk estimation (PE-SCORE).开发和验证一种预后工具:肺栓塞短期临床结局风险评估(PE-SCORE)。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260036. eCollection 2021.
3
Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction or elevated cardiac biomarkers in patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低危肺栓塞患者右心功能障碍或心脏生物标志物升高的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 14;40(11):902-910. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy873.
4
Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: echocardiography predictors of clinical deterioration.中危肺栓塞:超声心动图预测临床恶化的指标。
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 4;26(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04030-z.
5
Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Dysfunction Markers for Serious Adverse Events in Acute Normotensive Pulmonary Embolism.右心室功能障碍标志物对急性血压正常肺栓塞严重不良事件的预后价值
J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;52(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Cardiac Computed Tomography Measurements in Pulmonary Embolism Associated with Clinical Deterioration.与临床病情恶化相关的肺栓塞的心脏计算机断层扫描测量
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):219-232. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20763.
7
Identification of Low-risk Patients With Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism.识别急性有症状性肺栓塞的低危患者。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2023 Sep;59(9):575-580. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
8
Assessment of right ventricular function in acute pulmonary embolism.急性肺栓塞时右心室功能的评估
Am Heart J. 2017 Mar;185:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
9
A Multimodality Imaging Approach to Defining Risk in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.多模态影像学方法在急性肺栓塞患者危险分层中的应用。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 Sep;36(9):933-940. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 May 11.
10
d-Dimer and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index in relation to right ventricular function.D-二聚体和简化的肺栓塞严重指数与右心室功能的关系。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;31(3):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac Computed Tomography Measurements in Pulmonary Embolism Associated with Clinical Deterioration.与临床病情恶化相关的肺栓塞的心脏计算机断层扫描测量
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):219-232. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20763.
2
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism Prognosis Using Nutritional and Inflammatory Indices.基于机器学习的营养和炎症指标预测肺栓塞预后。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241300484. doi: 10.1177/10760296241300484.
3
Disposition of emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism after ambulance arrival.

本文引用的文献

1
Management and Outcomes of Adults Diagnosed with Acute Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Community-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.成人在初级保健中诊断为急性肺栓塞的管理和结局:基于社区的回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3620-3629. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07289-0. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic tool: Pulmonary embolism short-term clinical outcomes risk estimation (PE-SCORE).开发和验证一种预后工具:肺栓塞短期临床结局风险评估(PE-SCORE)。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260036. eCollection 2021.
3
Triaging acute pulmonary embolism for home treatment by Hestia or simplified PESI criteria: the HOME-PE randomized trial.
救护车到达后急诊科急性肺栓塞患者的处置情况。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Nov 23;4(6):e13068. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13068. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Comparing predictive performance of pulmonary embolism risk stratification tools for acute clinical deterioration.比较肺栓塞风险分层工具对急性临床恶化的预测性能。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 May 26;4(3):e12983. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12983. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Quality of life 1 month after acute pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients.急诊科急性肺栓塞患者 1 个月后的生活质量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;30(8):819-831. doi: 10.1111/acem.14692. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Sustainability of a Clinical Decision Support Intervention for Outpatient Care for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.临床决策支持干预对急诊科急性肺栓塞门诊患者的可持续性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212340. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12340.
Hestia 或简化 PESI 标准对急性肺栓塞进行家庭治疗分诊:HOME-PE 随机试验。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Aug 31;42(33):3146-3157. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab373.
4
Executive Summary: Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: Second Update of the CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.执行摘要:静脉血栓栓塞症的抗血栓治疗:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告的第二次更新。
Chest. 2021 Dec;160(6):2247-2259. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.056. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
5
Right ventricle assessment in patients with pulmonary embolism at low risk for death based on clinical models: an individual patient data meta-analysis.基于临床模型评估低死亡风险肺栓塞患者的右心室功能:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Aug 31;42(33):3190-3199. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab329.
6
Prognostic significance of computed tomography-assessed right ventricular enlargement in low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描评估的右心室扩大对低危肺栓塞患者的预后意义:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Res. 2021 Jan;197:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
7
Need for Transthoracic Echocardiogram in Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.低危肺血栓栓塞症患者行经胸超声心动图检查的必要性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2020 May;56(5):306-313. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.08.025. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS).2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)合作制定的急性肺栓塞诊断和管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.
9
Prognostic value of right ventricular dysfunction or elevated cardiac biomarkers in patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低危肺栓塞患者右心功能障碍或心脏生物标志物升高的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Mar 14;40(11):902-910. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy873.
10
Rate and duration of hospitalisation for acute pulmonary embolism in the real-world clinical practice of different countries: analysis from the RIETE registry.
Eur Respir J. 2019 Feb 21;53(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01677-2018. Print 2019 Feb.