William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 15;17(3):e0265315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265315. eCollection 2022.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing has demonstrated clinical utility in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). However, to what extent exercise responses are independent of, or confounded by, aerobic fitness remains unclear.
To characterize and compare exercise responses in ME/CFS and controls with and without matching for aerobic fitness.
As part of the Multi-site Clinical Assessment of ME/CFS (MCAM) study, 403 participants (n = 214 ME/CFS; n = 189 controls), across six ME/CFS clinics, completed ramped cycle ergometry to volitional exhaustion. Metabolic, heart rate (HR), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured. Ventilatory equivalent ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), metrics of ventilatory efficiency, and chronotropic incompetence (CI) were calculated. Exercise variables were compared using Hedges' g effect size with 95% confidence intervals. Differences in cardiopulmonary and perceptual features during exercise were analyzed using linear mixed effects models with repeated measures for relative exercise intensity (20-100% peak [Formula: see text]). Subgroup analyses were conducted for 198 participants (99 ME/CFS; 99 controls) matched for age (±5 years) and peak [Formula: see text] (~1 ml/kg/min-1).
Ninety percent of tests (n = 194 ME/CFS, n = 169 controls) met standard criteria for peak effort. ME/CFS responses during exercise (20-100% peak [Formula: see text]) were significantly lower for ventilation, breathing frequency, HR, measures of efficiency, and CI and significantly higher for [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and RPE (p<0.05adjusted). For the fitness-matched subgroup, differences remained for breathing frequency, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and RPE (p<0.05adjusted), and higher tidal volumes were identified for ME/CFS (p<0.05adjusted). Exercise responses at the gas exchange threshold, peak, and for measures of ventilatory efficiency (e.g., [Formula: see text]) were generally reflective of those seen throughout exercise (i.e., 20-100%).
Compared to fitness-matched controls, cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in ME/CFS are characterized by inefficient exercise ventilation and augmented perception of effort. These data highlight the importance of distinguishing confounding fitness effects to identify responses that may be more specifically associated with ME/CFS.
心肺运动测试已在肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)中证明具有临床应用价值。然而,运动反应在多大程度上独立于或受到有氧健身的影响仍不清楚。
在有氧健身匹配和不匹配的情况下,描述并比较 ME/CFS 和对照组的运动反应。
作为多地点 ME/CFS 临床评估(MCAM)研究的一部分,来自六个 ME/CFS 诊所的 403 名参与者(n=214 ME/CFS;n=189 名对照)完成了递增式踏车运动直至力竭。测量代谢、心率(HR)和感知用力程度(RPE)。计算通气当量比([Formula: see text],[Formula: see text])、通气效率指标和变时性功能不全(CI)。使用 Hedge's g 效应大小和 95%置信区间比较运动变量。使用线性混合效应模型和相对运动强度的重复测量(20-100%峰值[Formula: see text])分析运动过程中心肺和感知特征的差异。对 198 名参与者(99 名 ME/CFS;99 名对照)进行亚组分析,这些参与者在年龄(±5 岁)和峰值[Formula: see text](~1 ml/kg/min-1)方面匹配。
90%的测试(n=194 ME/CFS,n=169 名对照)达到了峰值努力的标准。在运动期间(20-100%峰值[Formula: see text]),ME/CFS 的通气、呼吸频率、HR、效率指标和 CI 较低,而[Formula: see text]、[Formula: see text]和 RPE 较高(p<0.05 调整后)。在体能匹配亚组中,呼吸频率、[Formula: see text]、[Formula: see text]和 RPE 仍存在差异(p<0.05 调整后),并且 ME/CFS 的潮气量较高(p<0.05 调整后)。运动时的气体交换阈值、峰值和通气效率指标(如[Formula: see text])通常反映了整个运动过程中的情况(即 20-100%)。
与体能匹配的对照组相比,ME/CFS 的心肺运动反应表现为运动通气效率低下和努力感知增强。这些数据强调了区分混杂的体能影响以识别可能与 ME/CFS 更相关的反应的重要性。