• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字接触者追踪系统降低 COVID-19 传播的潜力:建模研究。

Potential reduction in transmission of COVID-19 by digital contact tracing systems: a modelling study.

机构信息

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.Te Pūnaha Matatini: Centre of Research Excellence in Complex Systems, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.

Manaaki Whenua, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.

出版信息

Math Med Biol. 2022 Jun 11;39(2):156-168. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqac002.

DOI:10.1093/imammb/dqac002
PMID:35290447
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital tools are being developed to support contact tracing as part of the global effort to control the spread of COVID-19. These include smartphone apps, Bluetooth-based proximity detection, location tracking and automatic exposure notification features. Evidence on the effectiveness of alternative approaches to digital contact tracing is so far limited.

METHODS

We use an age-structured branching process model of the transmission of COVID-19 in different settings to estimate the potential of manual contact tracing and digital tracing systems to help control the epidemic. We investigate the effect of the uptake rate and proportion of contacts recorded by the digital system on key model outputs: the effective reproduction number, the mean outbreak size after 30 days and the probability of elimination.

RESULTS

Effective manual contact tracing can reduce the effective reproduction number from 2.4 to around 1.5. The addition of a digital tracing system with a high uptake rate over 75% could further reduce the effective reproduction number to around 1.1. Fully automated digital tracing without manual contact tracing is predicted to be much less effective.

CONCLUSIONS

For digital tracing systems to make a significant contribution to the control of COVID-19, they need be designed in close conjunction with public health agencies to support and complement manual contact tracing by trained professionals.

摘要

背景

为了控制 COVID-19 的传播,全球正在开发数字工具来支持接触者追踪。这些工具包括智能手机应用程序、基于蓝牙的近距离检测、位置跟踪和自动暴露通知功能。到目前为止,有关替代数字接触者追踪方法的有效性的证据有限。

方法

我们使用不同环境下 COVID-19 传播的年龄结构分支过程模型来估计手动接触者追踪和数字追踪系统帮助控制疫情的潜力。我们调查了数字系统记录的接触者的吸收率和比例对关键模型输出的影响:有效繁殖数、30 天后的平均爆发规模和消除概率。

结果

有效的手动接触者追踪可以将有效繁殖数从 2.4 降低到 1.5 左右。如果添加一个吸收率超过 75%的高吸收率数字追踪系统,则可以进一步将有效繁殖数降低到 1.1 左右。如果没有手动接触者追踪的完全自动化数字追踪,预计效果会差得多。

结论

为了使数字追踪系统对 COVID-19 的控制做出重大贡献,它们需要与公共卫生机构密切合作,以支持和补充经过培训的专业人员的手动接触者追踪。

相似文献

1
Potential reduction in transmission of COVID-19 by digital contact tracing systems: a modelling study.数字接触者追踪系统降低 COVID-19 传播的潜力:建模研究。
Math Med Biol. 2022 Jun 11;39(2):156-168. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqac002.
2
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
3
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Early evidence of effectiveness of digital contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland.瑞士数字接触者追踪在 SARS-CoV-2 防控中的早期有效性证据。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Dec 16;150:w20457. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20457. eCollection 2020 Dec 14.
5
Individual-Level Evaluation of the Exposure Notification Cascade in the SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App: Observational Study.瑞士新冠数字接触追踪应用程序中暴露通知级联的个体水平评估:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 19;8(5):e35653. doi: 10.2196/35653.
6
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.使用文氏图评估数字接触者追踪:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e30004. doi: 10.2196/30004.
7
An SEIR network epidemic model with manual and digital contact tracing allowing delays.带有人工和数字接触者追踪且允许延迟的 SEIR 网络传染病模型。
Math Biosci. 2024 Aug;374:109231. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2024.109231. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
8
Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19. Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers?模拟 COVID-19 的数字和手动接触者追踪。低参与率和错过的接触者是否是关键问题?
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0259969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259969. eCollection 2021.
9
Bidirectional contact tracing could dramatically improve COVID-19 control.双向接触者追踪可显著改善 COVID-19 控制效果。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 11;12(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20325-7.
10
Digital Contact Tracing Based on a Graph Database Algorithm for Emergency Management During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Case Study.基于图数据库算法的 COVID-19 疫情应急管理数字接触者追踪:案例研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):e26836. doi: 10.2196/26836.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Haulage Drivers in Uganda's COVID-19 Delta Wave.评估乌干达货运司机在新冠病毒德尔塔变异株疫情浪潮中的影响。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s44197-025-00387-w.
2
Governing digital crisis responses: platform standards and the dilemma of COVID-19 contact tracing.管理数字危机应对措施:平台标准与新冠疫情接触者追踪的困境
J Bus Econ. 2023;93(1-2):267-323. doi: 10.1007/s11573-022-01118-4. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
3
Emerging advances in biosecurity to underpin human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health.
生物安全领域的新进展为人类、动物、植物和生态系统健康提供支撑。
iScience. 2023 Jul 31;26(9):107462. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107462. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
4
Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.新冠疫情背景下接触者追踪干预措施的效果比较:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;38(3):243-266. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00963-z. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
The German COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing App: A Socioeconomic Evaluation.德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用:社会经济评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;19(21):14318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114318.
6
Expert insights on digital contact tracing: interviews with contact tracing policy professionals in New Zealand.数字接触者追踪专家观点:对新西兰接触者追踪政策专业人员的访谈。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 1;37(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac059.
7
COVID-19 contact-tracing smartphone application usage-The New Zealand COVID Tracer experience.新冠病毒病接触者追踪智能手机应用程序的使用——新西兰新冠病毒追踪器的经验
Telecomm Policy. 2022 Sep;46(8):102386. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102386. Epub 2022 May 24.
8
Exploring the drivers and barriers to uptake for digital contact tracing.探索数字接触者追踪的推广驱动因素和障碍。
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100212. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100212. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
Digital contact tracing, community uptake, and proximity awareness technology to fight COVID-19: a systematic review.用于抗击新冠肺炎的数字接触者追踪、社区接受度及近距离感知技术:一项系统综述
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Aug;71:102995. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102995. Epub 2021 May 12.