• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒病接触者追踪智能手机应用程序的使用——新西兰新冠病毒追踪器的经验

COVID-19 contact-tracing smartphone application usage-The New Zealand COVID Tracer experience.

作者信息

Howell Bronwyn E, Potgieter Petrus H

机构信息

School of Management, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.

Institute for Technology and Network Economics, United States.

出版信息

Telecomm Policy. 2022 Sep;46(8):102386. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102386. Epub 2022 May 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102386
PMID:35642178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9127129/
Abstract

Contact tracing has been a central pillar of the nonpharmaceutical health system response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Countries around the world have devoted unprecedented levels of resources to build up their testing and tracing capabilities, including the development and deployment of smartphone-based applications. Yet despite these nontrivial investments, the body of academic literature evaluating the effects of the smartphone-based applications remains scant and many apps have not delivered the promised benefits (Bano et al. 2021). We contribute to this body of empirical evidence by analysing data on uptake and usage of New Zealand's QR code-based application New Zealand COVID Tracer (NZCT). Our paper uses descriptive statistics and regression analysis to focus on the likelihood of an individual registering to use the application, the likelihood that a registered user will use the application to scan QR codes, and the extent of that usage, measured as the number of codes scanned daily. In addition, we take advantage of the "natural experiment" offered by the decision in August 2021 following the establishment of endemic community transmission of COVID-19 to make use of the application mandatory from 7 September 2021 to assess the effect of this policy on usage. We find that despite increasing numbers of individuals downloading the application over time, the number of active devices and scanning activity was very low, even when community outbreaks occurred (i.e. actual infection risk was higher). Mandating use (separate and distinct from increased infection risk) led to an increase in the number of scans in total via an increase in the number of active devices only.

摘要

接触者追踪一直是非药物卫生系统应对新冠疫情的核心支柱。世界各国投入了前所未有的资源来增强其检测和追踪能力,包括开发和部署基于智能手机的应用程序。然而,尽管有这些重大投资,但评估基于智能手机应用程序效果的学术文献仍然很少,而且许多应用程序并未带来承诺的好处(巴诺等人,2021年)。我们通过分析新西兰基于二维码的应用程序“新西兰新冠追踪器”(NZCT)的使用和采用数据,为这一实证证据做出了贡献。我们的论文使用描述性统计和回归分析,重点关注个人注册使用该应用程序的可能性、注册用户使用该应用程序扫描二维码的可能性,以及以每日扫描码数量衡量的使用程度。此外,我们利用2021年8月在新冠疫情出现社区地方性传播后做出的决定所提供的“自然实验”,自2021年9月7日起强制使用该应用程序,以评估这一政策对使用情况的影响。我们发现,尽管随着时间推移下载该应用程序的人数不断增加,但即使在社区爆发疫情(即实际感染风险较高)时,活跃设备数量和扫描活动也非常低。强制使用(与感染风险增加无关)仅通过增加活跃设备数量,导致扫描总数增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/194e08e55fb3/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/10477982868e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/c16a37e6d56a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/f2aeda0ab31a/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/4100100c6f7f/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/4768d171a8d5/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/5a7eaef2f17a/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/e1b1c97d9e36/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/194e08e55fb3/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/10477982868e/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/c16a37e6d56a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/f2aeda0ab31a/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/4100100c6f7f/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/4768d171a8d5/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/5a7eaef2f17a/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/e1b1c97d9e36/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e19/9127129/194e08e55fb3/gr8_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 contact-tracing smartphone application usage-The New Zealand COVID Tracer experience.新冠病毒病接触者追踪智能手机应用程序的使用——新西兰新冠病毒追踪器的经验
Telecomm Policy. 2022 Sep;46(8):102386. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102386. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
User Experiences of the NZ COVID Tracer App in New Zealand: Thematic Analysis of Interviews.新西兰新冠病毒追踪应用程序在新西兰的用户体验:访谈主题分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):e26318. doi: 10.2196/26318.
3
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
4
Factors impacting the use of the NZ COVID Tracer application in New Zealand".影响新西兰新冠病毒追踪应用程序在新西兰使用的因素
Smart Health (Amst). 2022 Jun;24:100278. doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100278. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
To Use or Not to Use a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Mixed Methods Survey in Wales.使用还是不使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:威尔士的混合方法调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):e29181. doi: 10.2196/29181.
6
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
7
The more the merrier! Barriers and facilitators to the general public's use of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in New Zealand.越多越好!新西兰公众使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的障碍和促进因素。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Apr 3;47(2):132-143. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1951274. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
8
Americans' perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic.美国人对 COVID-19 大流行期间隐私和监控的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0242652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242652. eCollection 2020.
9
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪:隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.
10
Features and Functionalities of Smartphone Apps Related to COVID-19: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.与新冠病毒相关的智能手机应用程序的特点和功能:应用商店中的系统搜索与内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e20334. doi: 10.2196/20334.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-Based Digital Contact Tracing of Emerging Infectious Diseases: Design and Implementation Study With Empirical COVID-19 Cases.基于社区的新发传染病数字化接触者追踪:以真实 COVID-19 病例为研究对象的设计与实施。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 8;25:e47219. doi: 10.2196/47219.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential reduction in transmission of COVID-19 by digital contact tracing systems: a modelling study.数字接触者追踪系统降低 COVID-19 传播的潜力:建模研究。
Math Med Biol. 2022 Jun 11;39(2):156-168. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqac002.
2
Factors impacting the use of the NZ COVID Tracer application in New Zealand".影响新西兰新冠病毒追踪应用程序在新西兰使用的因素
Smart Health (Amst). 2022 Jun;24:100278. doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100278. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
3
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.
澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Exploring the drivers and barriers to uptake for digital contact tracing.探索数字接触者追踪的推广驱动因素和障碍。
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100212. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100212. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Measuring the scientific effectiveness of contact tracing: Evidence from a natural experiment.衡量接触者追踪的科学效果:来自自然实验的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 17;118(33). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100814118.
6
User Experiences of the NZ COVID Tracer App in New Zealand: Thematic Analysis of Interviews.新西兰新冠病毒追踪应用程序在新西兰的用户体验:访谈主题分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):e26318. doi: 10.2196/26318.
7
Sixty seconds on . . . the pingdemic.六十秒倒计时……“ping”疫情。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 19;374:n1822. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1822.
8
The more the merrier! Barriers and facilitators to the general public's use of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in New Zealand.越多越好!新西兰公众使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的障碍和促进因素。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Apr 3;47(2):132-143. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1951274. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
9
Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.台湾和新西兰应对新冠疫情的卫生举措带来的潜在经验教训。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Nov;4:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
10
Benefits of Mobile Contact Tracing on COVID-19: Tracing Capacity Perspectives.移动接触者追踪对新冠疫情的益处:追踪能力视角
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;9:586615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.586615. eCollection 2021.