Suppr超能文献

挪威市场上的植物基肉类和奶制品替代品:替代品与同等肉类和奶制品的宏量营养素含量比较。

Plant-based meat and dairy substitutes on the Norwegian market: comparing macronutrient content in substitutes with equivalent meat and dairy products.

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Nutr Sci. 2022 Feb 10;11:e9. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.6. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

To assess and compare the macronutrient and salt content in meat and dairy substitutes available on the Norwegian market. : Comparison between substitute products and two groups of meat and dairy products where one group represented the healthiest option (Keyhole) and one the most used option (Regular). Kruskal-Wallis test with pairwise comparison was conducted on categories with more than two groups, and Mann-Whitney test was conducted on categories with two groups. : Online stores in Norway. Hundred and two meat substitute products and 173 milk and dairy substitute products on sale spring and autumn 2020 were assessed; additionally, ninety-eight equivalent meat products and 105 milk and dairy products. : While Keyhole and Regular meat did not contain fibre, meat substitutes contained 3⋅5-5⋅0 g fibre per 100 g. The saturated fat content in meat substitutes was on average 1⋅9 times lower than in Keyhole products and 5⋅8 times lower than in Regular products. Milk and dairy substitutes contained 3⋅2 and 3⋅4 times less protein than Keyhole and Regular products, respectively. : The study results indicate that meat and dairy substitutes on the Norwegian market vary in nutritional composition. Compared to Keyhole and Regular, substitutes contained lower levels of saturated fat, meat substitutes contained higher levels of fibre and milk and dairy substitutes less protein. Future studies should include content of micronutrients for a more comprehensive assessment.

摘要

评估和比较挪威市场上肉类和奶制品替代品的宏量营养素和盐含量

替代产品与两组肉类和奶制品的比较,其中一组代表最健康的选择(Keyhole),另一组代表最常用的选择(Regular)。对于多于两组的类别,进行了 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和两两比较,对于两组类别的进行了 Mann-Whitney U 检验。

挪威的在线商店。2020 年春季和秋季评估了 102 种肉类替代品和 173 种牛奶和奶制品替代品,另外还评估了 98 种等效的肉类产品和 105 种牛奶和奶制品。Keyhole 和 Regular 肉类中不含纤维,而肉类替代品中每 100 克含有 3.5-5.0 克纤维。肉类替代品中的饱和脂肪含量平均比 Keyhole 产品低 1.9 倍,比 Regular 产品低 5.8 倍。牛奶和奶制品替代品中的蛋白质含量分别比 Keyhole 和 Regular 产品低 3.2 倍和 3.4 倍。

研究结果表明,挪威市场上的肉类和奶制品替代品在营养成分上存在差异。与 Keyhole 和 Regular 相比,替代品中的饱和脂肪含量较低,肉类替代品中的纤维含量较高,而牛奶和奶制品替代品中的蛋白质含量较低。未来的研究应该包括微量元素的含量,以进行更全面的评估。

相似文献

2
Consumption of meat and dairy substitute products amongst vegans, vegetarians and pescatarians.
Food Nutr Res. 2023 Mar 31;67. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v67.9081. eCollection 2023.
5
Nutritional quality and price of plant-based dairy and meat analogs in the Canadian food supply system.
J Food Sci. 2023 Aug;88(8):3594-3606. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16691. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Nutrient composition of milk and plant-based milk alternatives: A cross-sectional study of products sold in Australia and Singapore.
Food Res Int. 2023 Nov;173(Pt 2):113475. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113475. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
10
Comparing meat and meat alternatives: an analysis of nutrient quality in five European countries.
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3349-3358. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001945. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

5
Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):e4753. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4753. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Nutrition classification schemes for plant-based meat analogues: Drivers to assess nutritional quality and identity profile.
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Jun 19;9:100796. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100796. eCollection 2024.
9
Nutritional profile of plant-based dairy alternatives in the Swedish market.
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Mar 13;8:100712. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100712. eCollection 2024.
10
Plant-based meat alternatives in South Africa: An analysis of products on supermarket shelves.
Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov 6;12(1):627-637. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3765. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

5
Commercialization of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives.
Trends Plant Sci. 2020 Nov;25(11):1055-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
6
Meat analog as future food: a review.
J Anim Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;62(2):111-120. doi: 10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.111. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Health issues and technological aspects of plant-based alternative milk.
Food Res Int. 2020 May;131:108972. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108972. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
9
Milk Analog: Plant based alternatives to conventional milk, production, potential and health concerns.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(18):3005-3023. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1674243. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Can Plant-Based Meat Alternatives Be Part of a Healthy and Sustainable Diet?
JAMA. 2019 Oct 22;322(16):1547-1548. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13187.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验