• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不断变化的胃口:欧洲肉类替代品的当前证据与未来展望

Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.

作者信息

Mustapa Muhammad Adzran Che, Baba Yasmina, Baishakhy Smita Dash, Kallas Zein

机构信息

Centre for Agro-Food Economics and Development-UPC-IRTA (CREDA) Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) Castelldefels Spain.

Organització i Recursos Humans Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.

出版信息

Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):e4753. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4753. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/fsn3.4753
PMID:39803275
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11725167/
Abstract

Consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental and health impacts of their food choices, leading to changes in consumption behavior. This study examines the consumption patterns and behaviors of European consumers regarding meat substitutes and identifies factors influencing their acceptance as alternative protein sources. The study involved 5000 participants from four European countries-France, Germany, Italy, and Spain with data extracted from the Mintel consumer database in 2024. Results indicate that over 50% of consumers in these countries have reduced their intake of red meat, with a notable portion of German consumers adhering to a vegan diet. Across the sample, females significantly differ from males, as they consume less meat, tend to limit their meat intake, and show a greater interest in reducing meat consumption. Baby Boomers predominantly consume more meat and show less interest in reducing their meat intake compared to younger generations. Economic and sustainability aspects are key perceptions driving the perceived benefits of reducing meat consumption. Additionally, preferences for locally sourced products, meat-like taste and texture, and natural ingredients are primary considerations when purchasing meat substitutes. Fish substitutes were rated as popular meat substitutes in France, Italy, and Spain, while breaded or battered meat/poultry substitutes were the most popular choice in Germany. Insights from this study are valuable for market researchers and the food industry, offering guidance on supplying appealing and sustainable protein alternatives that encourage a shift toward healthier and more sustainable consumption behavior.

摘要

消费者越来越意识到他们的食物选择对环境和健康的影响,这导致了消费行为的变化。本研究考察了欧洲消费者对肉类替代品的消费模式和行为,并确定了影响他们将其作为替代蛋白质来源接受度的因素。该研究涉及来自法国、德国、意大利和西班牙这四个欧洲国家的5000名参与者,数据于2024年从英敏特消费者数据库中提取。结果表明,这些国家超过50%的消费者减少了红肉摄入量,相当一部分德国消费者坚持纯素饮食。在整个样本中,女性与男性存在显著差异,因为她们吃肉较少,倾向于限制肉类摄入量,并且对减少肉类消费表现出更大的兴趣。与年轻一代相比,婴儿潮一代主要吃肉更多,对减少肉类摄入量的兴趣较低。经济和可持续性方面是推动减少肉类消费感知益处的关键认知。此外,购买肉类替代品时,对本地采购产品、类似肉类的味道和质地以及天然成分的偏好是主要考虑因素。在法国、意大利和西班牙,鱼类替代品被评为受欢迎的肉类替代品,而裹面包屑或面糊的肉类/家禽替代品在德国是最受欢迎的选择。这项研究的见解对市场研究人员和食品行业很有价值,为提供有吸引力且可持续的蛋白质替代品提供了指导,鼓励向更健康、更可持续的消费行为转变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8ba/11725167/f40bf5c44123/FSN3-13-e4753-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8ba/11725167/f40bf5c44123/FSN3-13-e4753-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8ba/11725167/f40bf5c44123/FSN3-13-e4753-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.不断变化的胃口:欧洲肉类替代品的当前证据与未来展望
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):e4753. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4753. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Preference and willingness to pay for meat substitutes based on micro-algae.基于微藻的肉类替代品的偏好和支付意愿。
Appetite. 2019 Nov 1;142:104353. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104353. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Discrete Choice Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Meathybrids-Findings from Germany and Belgium.肉类替代品消费者偏好的离散选择分析——来自德国和比利时的研究结果
Foods. 2020 Dec 31;10(1):71. doi: 10.3390/foods10010071.
4
Impact of sustainability perception on consumption of organic meat and meat substitutes.可持续性感知对有机肉类和肉类替代品消费的影响。
Appetite. 2019 Jan 1;132:196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
Ultra-processed vegan foods: Healthy alternatives to animal-source foods or avoidable junk?超加工素食食品:动物源食品的健康替代品还是可避免的垃圾食品?
J Food Sci. 2024 Nov;89(11):7008-7021. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.17407. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
6
Comparing the nutritional value and prices of meat and milk substitutes with their animal-based benchmarks across six European countries.比较六个欧洲国家肉类和奶制品替代品与其动物制品基准的营养价值和价格。
Food Res Int. 2024 Dec;197(Pt 1):115213. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115213. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
7
Committed vs. uncommitted meat eaters: Understanding willingness to change protein consumption.坚定的肉食者与不坚定的肉食者:了解改变蛋白质摄入的意愿。
Appetite. 2019 Jul 1;138:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
8
Willingness to replace animal-based products with pulses among consumers in different European countries.不同欧洲国家消费者对用豆类替代动物产品的意愿。
Food Res Int. 2022 Jul;157:111403. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111403. Epub 2022 May 26.
9
Revealed preferences on meat substitute consumption and political attitudes - Testing the left-right and environmental concerns framework.肉类替代品消费的显示性偏好与政治态度——检验左右派和环境关切框架
Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107371. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107371. Epub 2024 May 1.
10
Comparing meat and meat alternatives: an analysis of nutrient quality in five European countries.比较肉类和肉类替代品:五个欧洲国家的营养质量分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3349-3358. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001945. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
From Tradition to the Future: Analyzing the Factors Shaping Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat Using Structural Equation Modeling.从传统到未来:运用结构方程模型分析影响消费者对人造肉接受度的因素
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jun 13;13(6):e70435. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70435. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability considerations are not influencing meat consumption in the US.可持续性考量并未影响美国人的肉类消费。
Appetite. 2024 Dec 1;203:107667. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107667. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: an individual-participant federated meta-analysis of 1·97 million adults with 100 000 incident cases from 31 cohorts in 20 countries.肉类消费与 2 型糖尿病发病风险:来自 20 个国家的 31 项队列研究中 197 万成年人的个体参与者荟萃分析,共发生 10 万例 2 型糖尿病病例。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Sep;12(9):619-630. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00179-7.
3
Comparing meat and meat alternatives: an analysis of nutrient quality in five European countries.
比较肉类和肉类替代品:五个欧洲国家的营养质量分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3349-3358. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001945. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Consumer perception of the challenges facing livestock production and meat consumption.消费者对畜牧生产和肉类消费所面临挑战的认知。
Meat Sci. 2023 Jun;200:109144. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109144. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Consumers' Attitudes towards Animal Suffering: A Systematic Review on Awareness, Willingness and Dietary Change.消费者对动物苦难的态度:意识、意愿和饮食改变的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316372.
6
Socioeconomic differences in animal food consumption: Education rather than income makes a difference.动物性食品消费中的社会经济差异:起作用的是教育而非收入。
Front Nutr. 2022 Nov 3;9:993379. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.993379. eCollection 2022.
7
Risk assessment of azo dyes as food additives: Revision and discussion of data gaps toward their improvement.偶氮染料作为食品添加剂的风险评估:针对数据缺口的修订与改进探讨。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023 Jan;22(1):380-407. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13072. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
8
Improving health and sustainability: Patterns of red and processed meat consumption across generations.改善健康和可持续性:代际间的红色和加工肉类消费模式。
Health Policy. 2022 Dec;126(12):1324-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Health effects associated with consumption of unprocessed red meat: a Burden of Proof study.与食用未加工红肉相关的健康影响:一个证明负担的研究。
Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):2075-2082. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01968-z. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
10
Critical food and nutrition science challenges for plant-based meat alternative products.植物肉替代品的关键食品和营养科学挑战。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2024;64(3):638-653. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2107994. Epub 2022 Aug 16.