• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较肉类和肉类替代品:五个欧洲国家的营养质量分析。

Comparing meat and meat alternatives: an analysis of nutrient quality in five European countries.

机构信息

Department of Management in Agribusiness (410C), Institute of Farm Management, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.

Professorship Agricultural and Food Economics, TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3349-3358. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001945. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980023001945
PMID:37800339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10755401/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the (macro-)nutritional composition of red meat (RM) and poultry meat (PM) products with the emerging category of meat substitutes.

DESIGN

We use information on nutritional values per 100 g to estimate the differences in the nutritional composition between RM, PM, vegan meat substitute (VMS) and non-vegan meat substitute (NVMS) and derive six unique meat product clusters to enhance the comparability.

SETTING

Meat markets from five major European countries: France, Germany, UK, Italy and Spain.

PARTICIPANTS/DATA: Product innovation data for 19 941 products from Mintel's Global New Product Database from 2010 to 2020.

RESULTS

Most of the innovations in the sample are RM products (55 %), followed by poultry (30 %), VMS (11 %) and NVMS (5 %). RM products exhibit a significantly higher energy content in kcal/100 g as well as fat, saturated fat, protein and salt all in g/100 g than the meatless alternatives, while the latter contain significantly more carbohydrates and fibre than either poultry or RM. However, results differ to a certain degree when products are grouped into more homogeneous clusters like sausages, cold cuts and burgers. This indicates that general conclusions regarding the health effects of substituting meat with plant-based alternatives should only be drawn in relation to comparable products.

CONCLUSIONS

Meat substitutes, both vegan and non-vegan, are rated as ultra-processed foods. However, compared with RM products, they and also poultry products both can provide a diet that contains fewer nutrients-to-limit, like salt and saturated fats.

摘要

目的

评估和比较红肉 (RM) 和禽肉 (PM) 产品与新兴肉类替代品的(宏观)营养成分。

设计

我们使用每 100 克的营养值信息来估计 RM、PM、植物性肉类替代品 (VMS) 和非植物性肉类替代品 (NVMS) 之间营养成分的差异,并得出六个独特的肉类产品集群,以提高可比性。

设置

来自五个主要欧洲国家的肉类市场:法国、德国、英国、意大利和西班牙。

参与者/数据:来自 Mintel 的全球新产品数据库的 2010 年至 2020 年的 19941 种产品的产品创新数据。

结果

样本中的大多数创新产品都是 RM 产品(55%),其次是禽肉(30%)、VMS(11%)和 NVMS(5%)。RM 产品每 100 克的热量、脂肪、饱和脂肪、蛋白质和盐含量均显著高于无肉替代品,而后者的碳水化合物和纤维含量则显著高于禽肉或 RM。然而,当产品分为更同质的集群,如香肠、冷切和汉堡时,结果会有所不同。这表明,用植物性替代品替代肉类对健康影响的一般结论,仅应与可比产品相关联。

结论

无论是植物性的还是非植物性的肉类替代品,都被评定为超加工食品。然而,与 RM 产品相比,它们以及禽肉产品都可以提供一种包含较少营养限制物的饮食,如盐和饱和脂肪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54b/10755401/7e9e7c38a10f/S1368980023001945_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54b/10755401/7e9e7c38a10f/S1368980023001945_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e54b/10755401/7e9e7c38a10f/S1368980023001945_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing meat and meat alternatives: an analysis of nutrient quality in five European countries.比较肉类和肉类替代品:五个欧洲国家的营养质量分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3349-3358. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001945. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
2
Analysis of the Nutritional Composition of Ready-to-Use Meat Alternatives in Belgium.分析比利时即用型肉类替代品的营养成分。
Nutrients. 2024 May 27;16(11):1648. doi: 10.3390/nu16111648.
3
Are Vegan Alternatives to Meat Products Healthy? A Study on Nutrients and Main Ingredients of Products Commercialized in Brazil.植物肉产品是健康的吗?对巴西商业化产品的营养成分和主要成分的研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 27;10:900598. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.900598. eCollection 2022.
4
5
Plant-Based Meat Substitutes in the Flexitarian Age: An Audit of Products on Supermarket Shelves.植物肉在弹性素食时代:超市货架产品审计。
Nutrients. 2019 Oct 30;11(11):2603. doi: 10.3390/nu11112603.
6
Changes in Food and Nutrient Intake and Diet Quality on a Low-Fat Vegan Diet Are Associated with Changes in Body Weight, Body Composition, and Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低脂纯素饮食的食物和营养素摄入及饮食质量的变化与超重成年人的体重、身体成分和胰岛素敏感性的变化相关:一项随机临床试验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022 Oct;122(10):1922-1939.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Are novel plant-based meat alternatives the healthier choice?新型植物基肉类替代品是更健康的选择吗?
Food Res Int. 2024 May;183:114184. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114184. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Comparative Assessment of the Nutritional Profile of Meat Products and Their Plant-Based Analogues.肉类产品及其植物基仿制品的营养状况比较评估。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 19;15(12):2807. doi: 10.3390/nu15122807.
9
Substituting Meat or Dairy Products with Plant-Based Substitutes Has Small and Heterogeneous Effects on Diet Quality and Nutrient Security: A Simulation Study in French Adults (INCA3).用植物性替代品替代肉类或乳制品对饮食质量和营养安全的影响较小且存在异质性:一项针对法国成年人的模拟研究(INCA3)。
J Nutr. 2021 Aug 7;151(8):2435-2445. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab146.
10
Plant-based meat and dairy substitutes on the Norwegian market: comparing macronutrient content in substitutes with equivalent meat and dairy products.挪威市场上的植物基肉类和奶制品替代品:替代品与同等肉类和奶制品的宏量营养素含量比较。
J Nutr Sci. 2022 Feb 10;11:e9. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.6. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary guidance on plant-based meat alternatives for individuals wanting to increase plant protein intake.针对希望增加植物蛋白摄入量的个人,关于植物性肉类替代品的饮食指南。
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 5;12:1641234. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1641234. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative analysis of the nutritional quality of plant-based and traditional meat products across European markets.欧洲市场上植物性和传统肉类产品营养品质的比较分析。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 16;12:1603600. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1603600. eCollection 2025.
3
A Nationwide Survey of Italian University Students: Exploring the Influences of Sustainable Dietary Behaviors, Lifestyle, and Sociodemographic Factors on Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet.

本文引用的文献

1
Why alternative proteins will not disrupt the meat industry.替代蛋白不会颠覆肉类行业。
Meat Sci. 2023 Sep;203:109223. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109223. Epub 2023 May 18.
2
Different and alike: Level and determinants of public acceptance of fattening pig, beef cattle and broiler farming in Germany.不同与相同:公众对德国育肥猪、肉牛和肉鸡养殖的接受程度及其决定因素。
Meat Sci. 2022 Nov;193:108946. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108946. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products.估算 57000 种食品的环境影响。
一项针对意大利大学生的全国性调查:探究可持续饮食行为、生活方式和社会人口学因素对坚持地中海饮食的影响。
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 12;17(12):1988. doi: 10.3390/nu17121988.
4
Cross-sectional associations between healthy and unhealthy plant-based diets and metabolic syndrome in three distinct French populations: a meta-analysis.三种不同法国人群中健康与不健康植物性饮食与代谢综合征之间的横断面关联:一项荟萃分析。
Br J Nutr. 2025 Mar 3;133(7):1-17. doi: 10.1017/S0007114525000376.
5
Editorial: Challenges in eating behavior.社论:饮食行为中的挑战
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 11;16:1563234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1563234. eCollection 2025.
6
Evolving Appetites: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives in Terms of Meat Substitutes in Europe.不断变化的胃口:欧洲肉类替代品的当前证据与未来展望
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Jan 12;13(1):e4753. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4753. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Availability, price and nutritional assessment of plant-based meat alternatives in hypermarkets and supermarkets in Petaling, the most populated district in Malaysia.马来西亚人口最多的八打灵县各大超市和大型超市中植物性肉类替代品的可得性、价格及营养评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 12;19(12):e0309507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309507. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparing Nutrient Profiles of Meat and Fish with Plant-Based Alternatives: Analysis of Nutrients, Ingredients, and Fortification Patterns.比较肉类和鱼类与植物性替代品的营养成分:营养成分、成分和强化模式分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 16;16(16):2725. doi: 10.3390/nu16162725.
9
Analysis of the Nutritional Composition of Ready-to-Use Meat Alternatives in Belgium.分析比利时即用型肉类替代品的营养成分。
Nutrients. 2024 May 27;16(11):1648. doi: 10.3390/nu16111648.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 16;119(33):e2120584119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120584119. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
4
Nutritional Quality of Meat Analogues: Results From the Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Project.肉类替代品的营养质量:意大利产品食品标签(FLIP)项目的结果。
Front Nutr. 2022 Apr 26;9:852831. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.852831. eCollection 2022.
5
The food system and climate change: are plant-based diets becoming unhealthy and less environmentally sustainable?食物系统与气候变化:植物性饮食变得不健康且环境可持续性降低了吗?
Proc Nutr Soc. 2022 May;81(2):162-167. doi: 10.1017/S0029665121003712. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
6
Chronic diseases are first associated with the degradation and artificialization of food matrices rather than with food composition: calorie quality matters more than calorie quantity.慢性病首先与食物基质的退化和人工化有关,而不是与食物成分有关:热量质量比热量数量更重要。
Eur J Nutr. 2022 Aug;61(5):2239-2253. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02786-8. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
7
Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Meat Products Available in the UK: A Cross-Sectional Survey.英国市售植物性肉类产品的营养质量:一项横断面调查。
Nutrients. 2021 Nov 25;13(12):4225. doi: 10.3390/nu13124225.
8
Global red and processed meat trade and non-communicable diseases.全球红肉类和加工肉类贸易与非传染性疾病。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006394.
9
Commercial foods for infants under the age of 36 months: an assessment of the availability and nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods.36 个月以下婴幼儿商业食品:对超加工食品的供应和营养成分的评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(11):3179-3186. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001555. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies.超加工食品与慢性非传染性疾病:43 项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2021 Mar;22(3):e13146. doi: 10.1111/obr.13146. Epub 2020 Nov 9.