Muñoz-López Alejandro, Galiano Carlos, Núñez Francisco Javier, Floría Pablo
Department of Human Motricity and Sports Performance, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Physical Performance & Sports Research Center. Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain.
J Hum Kinet. 2022 Feb 10;81:15-25. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0002. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Flywheel resistance training devices can be classified by their shaft shape. The objective of this study was to analyze whether using two flywheel resistance training devices shaft shapes can influence force and velocity production, regardless of the inertia used. Thirty-nine (n = 39) healthy active men participated in this study. They were randomized to perform 3 sets of 7 repetitions at maximal concentric voluntary execution, followed by a break in the last third of the eccentric phase in the half squat exercise. A progressive rotational inertial setting of 0.11, 0.22, and 0.33 kg·m was used. Force- and velocity-time profiles were captured using two force plates and a synchronized linear encoder. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare biomechanical output between the flywheel devices. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Force application was significantly higher in the horizontal cylinder-shaped device for the three moments of inertia used in the eccentric phase (p < 0.001). In the concentric phase, force application was significantly higher in the horizontal cylinder-shaped device in 0.11 (p < 0.001) and 0.22 kg·m (p < 0.001). The resultant speed was higher in the vertical cone-shaped device in the concentric phase and the eccentric phase for the three moments of inertia (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the flywheel shaft type determines the mechanical output of the half squat exercise, regardless of the moment of inertia used. While a horizontal cylinder-shaped device is more suitable to achieve higher forces, especially in the eccentric phase, a vertical cone-shaped device can be used to achieve higher speeds during the execution of the exercise.
飞轮阻力训练设备可根据其轴的形状进行分类。本研究的目的是分析使用两种飞轮阻力训练设备的轴形状是否会影响力量和速度的产生,而不考虑所使用的惯性。39名健康活跃的男性参与了本研究。他们被随机安排在最大向心自愿执行时进行3组,每组7次重复,然后在半蹲运动的离心阶段的最后三分之一处休息。使用了0.11、0.22和0.33 kg·m的渐进旋转惯性设置。使用两个测力板和一个同步线性编码器来捕捉力和速度-时间曲线。使用统计参数映射来比较飞轮设备之间的生物力学输出。显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。在离心阶段使用的三种惯性下,水平圆柱形状的设备在力的施加方面显著更高(p < 0.001)。在向心阶段,水平圆柱形状的设备在0.11(p < 0.001)和0.22 kg·m(p < 0.001)时力的施加显著更高。对于三种惯性,垂直圆锥形状的设备在向心阶段和离心阶段的合成速度更高(p < 0.001)。总之,无论使用何种惯性矩,飞轮轴的类型决定了半蹲运动的机械输出。虽然水平圆柱形状的设备更适合产生更高的力量,特别是在离心阶段,但垂直圆锥形状的设备可用于在运动执行过程中实现更高的速度。