• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)检测阴性结果后,通过残余风险信息传递减少错误保证的影响:对一项假设性检测的在线实验研究。

Impact of residual risk messaging to reduce false reassurance following test-negative results from asymptomatic coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) testing: an online experimental study of a hypothetical test.

机构信息

Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK

Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e056533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056533.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056533
PMID:35296483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8927897/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Individuals who receive a negative lateral flow coronavirus test result may misunderstand it as meaning 'no risk of infectiousness', giving false reassurance. This experiment tested the impact of adding information to negative test result messages about residual risk and the need to continue protective behaviours.

DESIGN

4 (residual risk) × 2 (post-test result behaviours) between-subjects design.

SETTING

Online.

PARTICIPANTS

1200 adults from a representative UK sample recruited via Prolific (12-15 March 2021).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly allocated to one of eight messages. Residual risk messages were: (1) 'Your coronavirus test result is negative' (control); (2) message 1 plus 'It's likely you were not infectious when the test was done' (current NHS Test & Trace (T&T); (3) message 2 plus 'But there is still a chance you may be infectious' (elaborated NHS T&T); and (4) message 3 plus infographic depicting residual risk (elaborated NHS T&T+infographic). Each message contained either no additional information or information about the need to continue following guidelines and protective behaviours.

OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Proportion understanding residual risk of infectiousness and (2) likelihood of engaging in protective behaviours (scales 1-7).

RESULTS

The control message decreased understanding relative to the current NHS T&T message: 54% versus 71% (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)=0.56 95% CI 0.34 to 0.95, p=0.030). Understanding increased with the elaborated NHS T&T (89%; AOR=3.25 95% CI 1.64 to 6.42, p=0.001) and elaborated NHS T&T+infographic (91%; AOR=5.16 95% CI 2.47 to 10.82, p<0.001) compared with current NHS T&T message. Likelihood of engaging in protective behaviours was unaffected by information (AOR=1.11 95% CI 0.69 to 1.80, χ(1)=0.18, p=0.669), being high (6.4, =0.9) across the sample.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of participants misunderstood the residual risk following a negative test result. The addition of a single sentence ('But there is still a chance you may be infectious') to current NHS T&T wording increased understanding of residual risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

OSF: https://osf.io/byfz3/.

摘要

目的

收到冠状病毒检测结果为阴性的人可能会误解其为“没有传染性”,从而产生错误的安全感。本实验测试了在阴性检测结果信息中添加关于残余风险和继续采取保护行为的必要性的信息对结果的影响。

设计

4(残余风险)×2(测试后结果行为)被试间设计。

地点

线上。

参与者

通过 Prolific(2021 年 3 月 12 日至 15 日)招募的来自代表性英国样本的 1200 名成年人。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配到八个信息中的一个。残余风险信息为:(1)“您的冠状病毒检测结果为阴性”(对照组);(2)信息 1 加“检测时您可能没有传染性”(当前的英国国民保健制度检测与追踪(T&T);(3)信息 2 加“但仍有感染的可能”(详细的英国国民保健制度 T&T);(4)信息 3 加说明残余风险的信息图(详细的英国国民保健制度 T&T+信息图)。每条信息都包含没有附加信息或需要继续遵循指导方针和保护行为的信息。

结果测量

(1)对传染性残余风险的理解程度和(2)参与保护行为的可能性(1-7 分)。

结果

与当前的 NHS T&T 信息相比,对照组信息降低了对残余风险的理解:54%对 71%(调整后的优势比(AOR)=0.56,95%置信区间(CI)0.34 至 0.95,p=0.030)。理解随着详细的 NHS T&T(89%;AOR=3.25,95%CI 1.64 至 6.42,p=0.001)和详细的 NHS T&T+信息图(91%;AOR=5.16,95%CI 2.47 至 10.82,p<0.001)而增加。与当前的 NHS T&T 信息相比,参与保护行为的可能性不受信息影响(AOR=1.11,95%CI 0.69 至 1.80,χ(1)=0.18,p=0.669),在整个样本中,保护行为的可能性都很高(6.4,=0.9)。

结论

相当一部分参与者对阴性检测结果后的残余风险存在误解。在当前 NHS T&T 措辞中添加一句(“但仍有感染的可能”)增加了对残余风险的理解。

试验注册

OSF:https://osf.io/byfz3/。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea3/8927897/e255e3c9965e/bmjopen-2021-056533f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea3/8927897/e255e3c9965e/bmjopen-2021-056533f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea3/8927897/e255e3c9965e/bmjopen-2021-056533f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of residual risk messaging to reduce false reassurance following test-negative results from asymptomatic coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) testing: an online experimental study of a hypothetical test.无症状冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)检测阴性结果后,通过残余风险信息传递减少错误保证的影响:对一项假设性检测的在线实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 16;12(3):e056533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056533.
2
How do the UK public interpret COVID-19 test results? Comparing the impact of official information about results and reliability used in the UK, USA and New Zealand: a randomised controlled trial.英国公众如何解读 COVID-19 检测结果?比较英国、美国和新西兰官方关于结果和可靠性的信息使用情况的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 20;11(5):e047731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047731.
3
'Immunity Passports' for SARS-CoV-2: an online experimental study of the impact of antibody test terminology on perceived risk and behaviour.SARS-CoV-2的“免疫护照”:关于抗体检测术语对感知风险和行为影响的在线实验研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 30;10(8):e040448. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040448.
4
SARS-CoV-2 antigen lateral flow tests for detecting infectious people: linked data analysis.SARS-CoV-2 抗原侧向流动检测用于检测感染人群:关联数据分析。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 23;376:e066871. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066871.
5
Who is engaging with lateral flow testing for COVID-19 in the UK? The COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses (CORSAIR) study.在英国,谁在使用侧向流动检测进行 COVID-19 检测?COVID-19 干预措施和反应依从性快速调查(CORSAIR)研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e058060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058060.
6
The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Coronavirus Disease 2019 Registry: An Analysis of Outcomes Among Pregnant Women Delivering During the Initial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Outbreak in the United States.产科麻醉与围产医学学会 2019 年冠状病毒病登记处:美国首次严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型爆发期间分娩孕妇结局分析。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Aug 1;133(2):462-473. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005592.
7
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
8
Do negative screening test results cause false reassurance? A systematic review.阴性筛查试验结果是否会造成虚假的安心感?一项系统性回顾。
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Nov;22(4):958-977. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12265. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
9
Factors Associated with Positive SARS-CoV-2 Test Results in Outpatient Health Facilities and Emergency Departments Among Children and Adolescents Aged <18 Years - Mississippi, September-November 2020.与 18 岁以下儿童和青少年在门诊医疗机构和急诊部门进行 SARS-CoV-2 检测阳性结果相关的因素-密西西比州,2020 年 9 月至 11 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 18;69(50):1925-1929. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950e3.
10
Whom Should We Test for COVID-19? Performance of a Symptom and Risk Factor Questionnaire on COVID-19 Test Results and Patient Outcomes in an Immediate Care Setting.我们应该对哪些人进行 COVID-19 检测?在即时护理环境中,COVID-19 检测结果和患者结局的症状和风险因素问卷的表现。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720981297. doi: 10.1177/2150132720981297.

引用本文的文献

1
Index cases first identified by nasal-swab rapid COVID-19 tests had more transmission to household contacts than cases identified by other test types.经鼻腔拭子快速 COVID-19 检测首次确定的索引病例比其他检测类型确定的病例向家庭接触者传播的更多。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292389. eCollection 2023.
2
The Agile Co-production and Evaluation framework for developing public health interventions, messaging and guidance.用于开发公共卫生干预措施、信息传递和指导的敏捷共同制定和评估框架。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 26;11:1094753. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1094753. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How do the UK public interpret COVID-19 test results? Comparing the impact of official information about results and reliability used in the UK, USA and New Zealand: a randomised controlled trial.英国公众如何解读 COVID-19 检测结果?比较英国、美国和新西兰官方关于结果和可靠性的信息使用情况的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 20;11(5):e047731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047731.
2
Effect of Information about COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Side Effects on Behavioural Intentions: Two Online Experiments.关于新冠疫苗有效性和副作用的信息对行为意图的影响:两项在线实验
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 13;9(4):379. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040379.
3
Applying harm reduction to COVID-19 prevention: The influence of moderation messages and risk infographics.
将减少伤害方法应用于 COVID-19 预防:适度信息和风险图表的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Feb;105(2):269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys.
英国对检测、追踪和隔离系统的遵守情况:37 项全国代表性调查的结果。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 31;372:n608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n608.
4
International experiences with co-production and people centredness offer lessons for covid-19 responses.国际上在共同制定计划和以人为本方面的经验为应对新冠疫情提供了借鉴。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4752.
5
Framing Messages to Deal With the COVID-19 Crisis: The Role of Loss/Gain Frames and Content.构建应对新冠疫情危机的信息框架:损失/收益框架及内容的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:568212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.568212. eCollection 2021.
6
'Immunity Passports' for SARS-CoV-2: an online experimental study of the impact of antibody test terminology on perceived risk and behaviour.SARS-CoV-2的“免疫护照”:关于抗体检测术语对感知风险和行为影响的在线实验研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 30;10(8):e040448. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040448.
7
Can We Test Our Way Out of the COVID-19 Pandemic?我们能否通过检测走出新冠大流行?
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02225-20.
8
The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help-seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer.阴性结直肠筛查结果对随后被诊断为结直肠间隔期癌症的患者的症状评估和寻求帮助行为的影响。
Health Expect. 2018 Aug;21(4):764-773. doi: 10.1111/hex.12672. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
9
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.恐惧诉求与态度改变的保护动机理论1。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
10
How do HIV-negative individuals in sub-Saharan Africa change their sexual risk behaviour upon learning their serostatus? A systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的HIV阴性个体在得知自己的血清学状态后,其性行为风险行为会如何改变?一项系统综述。
Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Dec;92(8):571-578. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052354. Epub 2016 Aug 17.