Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Aug;35(4):962-969. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00575-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction models are widely used in modern medicine and are incorporated into prominent guidelines. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a marker of coronary atherosclerotic disease and has proven utility for predicting cardiovascular disease. Despite this, current guidelines recommend against including CAC scores in CVD prediction models due to the medical and financial costs of acquiring it, and the insufficient evidence concerning its ability to improve existing models. Modern machine learning models are capable of automatically extracting coronary calcium scores from existing chest computed tomography (CT) scans, negating these costs. To determine whether the inclusion of CAC scores, automatically extracted using a machine learning algorithm from chest CTs performed for any reason, improves the performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology 2013 pooled cohort equations (PCE). A retrospective cohort of patients with available chest CTs prior to an index date (2012) was used to compare the performance of the PCE model and an augmented-PCE model which utilizes the CT-based CAC scores on top of the existing model. The PCE and the augmented-PCE predictions were calculated as of an index date (2012) using data from the electronic health record and existing chest CTs. The performance of both models was evaluated by comparing their predictions to cardiovascular events that occurred during a 5-year follow-up period (until 2017). A total of 14,135 patients aged 40-79 years were included in the study, of whom 470 (3.3%) had documented CVD events during the follow-up. The augmented-PCE model showed a significant improvement in c-statistic (0.64 ≥ 0.69, Δ = 0.05, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.06), sensitivity (53% ≥ 57%, Δ = 4.7%, 95% CI: 0-9.0%), specificity (67% ≥ 70%, Δ = 2.8%, 95% CI: 0.9-5.1%), in positive predictive value (5% ≥ 6%, Δ = 0.9%, 95% CI: 0.4 to 1.4%), negative predictive value (97.7% ≥ 97.9%, Δ = 0.3%, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.5%), and in the categorical net reclassification index (7.4%, 95% CI: 2.4 to 12.1%). Automatically generated CAC scores from existing CTs can aid in CVD risk determination, improving model performance when used on top of existing predictors. Use of existing CTs avoids most pitfalls currently cited against the routine use of CAC in CVD predictions (e.g., additional radiation exposure), and thus affords a net gain in predictive accuracy.
心血管疾病(CVD)预测模型在现代医学中得到广泛应用,并被纳入重要指南中。冠状动脉钙(CAC)是冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病的标志物,已被证明可用于预测心血管疾病。尽管如此,由于获取 CAC 评分的医疗和经济成本,以及关于其改善现有模型能力的证据不足,目前的指南建议不将 CAC 评分纳入 CVD 预测模型中。现代机器学习模型能够自动从现有的胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)中提取冠状动脉钙评分,从而消除这些成本。为了确定是否可以通过使用机器学习算法从因任何原因而进行的胸部 CT 中自动提取 CAC 评分来改善美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会 2013 年联合队列方程(PCE)的性能。使用在索引日期(2012 年)之前有可用胸部 CT 的患者的回顾性队列,比较了 PCE 模型和使用现有模型之上的基于 CT 的 CAC 评分的增强型 PCE 模型的性能。使用电子健康记录和现有胸部 CT 中的数据,在索引日期(2012 年)计算 PCE 和增强型 PCE 预测值。通过比较 5 年随访期间(截至 2017 年)发生的心血管事件来评估两种模型的性能。共有 14135 名年龄在 40-79 岁的患者纳入研究,其中 470 名(3.3%)在随访期间发生了有记录的 CVD 事件。增强型 PCE 模型在 C 统计量(0.64≥0.69,Δ=0.05,95%CI:0.03 至 0.06)、敏感性(53%≥57%,Δ=4.7%,95%CI:0 至 9.0%)、特异性(67%≥70%,Δ=2.8%,95%CI:0.9%至 5.1%)、阳性预测值(5%≥6%,Δ=0.9%,95%CI:0.4%至 1.4%)、阴性预测值(97.7%≥97.9%,Δ=0.3%,95%CI:0.1%至 0.5%)和分类净重新分类指数(7.4%,95%CI:2.4%至 12.1%)方面均有显著改善。从现有的 CT 中自动生成的 CAC 评分可帮助确定 CVD 风险,在用于现有预测因子之上时可提高模型性能。使用现有的 CT 可避免目前对 CAC 常规用于 CVD 预测的大多数缺陷(例如,额外的辐射暴露),因此可提高预测准确性。