• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历中的默认医嘱与警示对住院患者丙型肝炎病毒筛查的影响:一项阶梯式随机临床试验。

Effect of a Default Order vs an Alert in the Electronic Health Record on Hepatitis C Virus Screening Among Hospitalized Patients: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2427.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2427
PMID:35297973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931559/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening has been recommended for patients born between 1945 and 1965, but rates remain low.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a default order within the admission order set increases HCV screening compared with a preexisting alert within the electronic health record.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 23, 2020, to April 10, 2021, at 2 hospitals within an academic medical center. Hospitalized patients born between 1945 and 1965 with no history of screening were included in the analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

During wedge 1 (a preintervention period), both hospital sites had an electronic alert prompting clinicians to consider HCV screening. During wedge 2, the first intervention wedge, the hospital site randomized to intervention (hospital B) had a default order for HCV screening implemented within the admission order set. During wedge 3, the second intervention wedge, the hospital site randomized to control (hospital A) had the default order set implemented.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Percentage of eligible patients who received HCV screening during the hospital stay.

RESULTS

The study included 7634 patients (4405 in the control group and 3229 in the intervention group). The mean (SD) age was 65.4 (5.8) years; 4246 patients (55.6%) were men; 2142 (28.1%) were Black and 4625 (60.6%) were White; and 2885 (37.8%) had commercial insurance and 3950 (51.7%) had Medicare. The baseline rate of HCV screening in wedge 1 was 585 of 1560 patients (37.5% [95% CI, 35.1%-40.0%]) in hospital A and 309 of 1003 patients (30.8% [95% CI, 27.9%-33.7%]) in hospital B. The main adjusted model showed an increase of 31.8 (95% CI, 29.7-33.8) percentage points in test completion in the intervention group compared with the control group (P <. 001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial found that embedding HCV screening as a default order in the electronic health record substantially increased ordering and completion of testing in the hospital compared with a conventional interruptive alert.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04525690.

摘要

重要性

丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查已被推荐用于 1945 年至 1965 年出生的患者,但筛查率仍然很低。

目的

评估在入院医嘱集中设置默认医嘱是否比电子病历中的现有提醒更能增加 HCV 筛查。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在学术医疗中心的 2 家医院进行的阶梯式随机临床试验,从 2020 年 6 月 23 日至 2021 年 4 月 10 日进行。分析纳入了在 1945 年至 1965 年出生且无筛查史的住院患者。

干预措施

在第 1 阶段(干预前阶段),两家医院都有一个电子提醒,提示临床医生考虑进行 HCV 筛查。在第 2 阶段(第 1 个干预阶段),医院 B 被随机分配到干预组(干预医院),在入院医嘱集中实施了 HCV 筛查的默认医嘱。在第 3 阶段(第 2 个干预阶段),医院 A 被随机分配到对照组(控制医院),实施了默认医嘱集。

主要结局和措施

在住院期间接受 HCV 筛查的合格患者比例。

结果

研究纳入了 7634 名患者(对照组 4405 名,干预组 3229 名)。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为 65.4(5.8)岁;4246 名患者(55.6%)为男性;2142 名(28.1%)为黑人,4625 名(60.6%)为白人;2885 名(37.8%)有商业保险,3950 名(51.7%)有医疗保险。第 1 阶段的 HCV 筛查基线率为:医院 A 中 1560 名患者中有 585 名(37.5%[95%CI,35.1%-40.0%]),医院 B 中 1003 名患者中有 309 名(30.8%[95%CI,27.9%-33.7%])。主要调整模型显示,与对照组相比,干预组完成测试的比例增加了 31.8(95%CI,29.7-33.8)个百分点(P<.001)。

结论和相关性

这项阶梯式随机临床试验发现,在电子病历中嵌入 HCV 筛查作为默认医嘱,与传统的中断式提醒相比,大大增加了医院的医嘱和检测完成率。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04525690。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae58/8931559/c4fb4d955a90/jamanetwopen-e222427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae58/8931559/f71fe08d0030/jamanetwopen-e222427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae58/8931559/c4fb4d955a90/jamanetwopen-e222427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae58/8931559/f71fe08d0030/jamanetwopen-e222427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae58/8931559/c4fb4d955a90/jamanetwopen-e222427-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of a Default Order vs an Alert in the Electronic Health Record on Hepatitis C Virus Screening Among Hospitalized Patients: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial.电子病历中的默认医嘱与警示对住院患者丙型肝炎病毒筛查的影响:一项阶梯式随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2427.
2
Doubling Hepatitis C Virus Screening in Primary Care Using Advanced Electronic Health Record Tools-A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.使用先进电子健康记录工具使基层医疗中丙型肝炎病毒筛查量翻倍——一项非随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):498-504. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05536-z. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial.电子健康记录中的价格透明度干预对临床医生开具住院实验室检查医嘱的影响:PRICE随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):939-945. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1144.
4
Opportunistic treatment of hepatitis C virus infection (OPPORTUNI-C): study protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of immediate versus outpatient treatment initiation among hospitalized people who inject drugs.机会性治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染(OPPORTUNI-C):一项在住院吸毒者中进行即时与门诊治疗启动的实用阶梯楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04434-8.
5
An Electronic Health Record-based Intervention to Promote Hepatitis C Virus Testing Among Adults Born Between 1945 and 1965: A Cluster-randomized Trial.一项基于电子健康记录的干预措施,以促进1945年至1965年出生的成年人进行丙型肝炎病毒检测:一项整群随机试验。
Med Care. 2017 Jun;55(6):590-597. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000715.
6
Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.对重病住院患者进行常规姑息治疗会诊:一项实用的集群随机试验。
JAMA. 2024 Jan 16;331(3):224-232. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25092.
7
Primary Care Evaluation of a Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Screening Education Intervention.初级保健对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)筛查教育干预的评估。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Oct 18;35(5):990-997. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.05.210508.
8
Statistical analysis plan for the Steppedwedge Cluster Randomized trial of Electronic Early Notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients (SCREEN).Steppedwedge 群随机对照试验电子预警脓毒症住院病房患者(SCREEN)的统计分析计划。
Trials. 2021 Nov 22;22(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05788-3.
9
Effect of a Quality Improvement Bundle to Standardize the Use of Intravenous Fluids for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.静脉输液在住院儿科患者中的使用规范的质量改进包的效果:一项阶梯式、整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jan 1;176(1):26-33. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4267.
10
Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.电子预警系统在住院病房患者脓毒症中的应用:一项基于阶段式楔形集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05562-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of an Embedded Infectious Disease Screening, Treatment, and Prevention Intervention Within an Inpatient Substance Use Treatment Program.住院物质使用治疗项目中嵌入式传染病筛查、治疗及预防干预措施的有效性
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 24;12(8):ofaf403. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf403. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Magnetic resonance evaluation of three-dimensional liver fat fraction by hepatitis C status and associations with inflammatory cytokines.丙型肝炎状态对肝脏三维脂肪分数的磁共振评估及其与炎性细胞因子的关联
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0327668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327668. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral interventions to improve population health outreach for hepatitis C screening: randomized clinical trial.行为干预措施提高丙型肝炎筛查的人群健康服务效果:随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2021 May 18;373:n1022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1022.
2
Effect of Integrating Machine Learning Mortality Estimates With Behavioral Nudges to Clinicians on Serious Illness Conversations Among Patients With Cancer: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.将机器学习死亡率估计与行为提示相结合,为临床医生提供指导,以改善癌症患者的严重疾病沟通:一项 stepped-wedge 聚类随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Dec 1;6(12):e204759. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4759. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
The simplest solution may be good, but is it good enough? Evaluating the effect of a nudge to administer calcium during blood product resuscitation for traumatic injuries.
最简单的解决方案可能是好的,但它足够好吗?评估在创伤性损伤的血液制品复苏过程中推动给予钙的效果。
Transfusion. 2025 May;65 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S113-S122. doi: 10.1111/trf.18180. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
4
Enhancing Hepatitis C Virus Testing, Linkage to Care, and Treatment Commencement in Hospitals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.加强医院丙型肝炎病毒检测、与治疗的衔接及治疗启动:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 4;12(2):ofaf056. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf056. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Albumin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: Care Variation, Disparities, and Outcomes.白蛋白用于自发性细菌性腹膜炎:护理差异、差距及结局
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 12. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003190.
6
Physician preferences for an electronic lung cancer screening decision aid.医生对电子肺癌筛查决策辅助工具的偏好。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 May;30(6 Spec No.):SP445-SP451. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89551.
7
Applying human-centered design to the construction of a cirrhosis management clinical decision support system.应用以人为中心的设计方法构建肝硬化管理临床决策支持系统。
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Feb 26;8(3). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000394. eCollection 2024 Mar 1.
8
Development of a risk-prediction model for primary aldosteronism in veterans with hypertension.高血压退伍军人原发性醛固酮增多症风险预测模型的开发。
Surgery. 2024 Jan;175(1):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.063. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
9
Opportunities for Enhanced Prevention and Control of Hepatitis C Through Improved Screening and Testing Efforts.通过加强筛查和检测工作提高丙型肝炎的预防和控制机会。
J Infect Dis. 2024 May 8;229(Supplement_3):S350-S356. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad199.
10
Clinical decision support and electronic interventions to improve care quality in chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis.改善慢性肝病和肝硬化护理质量的临床决策支持与电子干预措施。
Hepatology. 2025 Apr 1;81(4):1353-1364. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000583. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
CDC Recommendations for Hepatitis C Screening Among Adults - United States, 2020.
美国疾病预防控制中心关于 2020 年成年人丙型肝炎筛查的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(2):1-17. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6902a1.
4
Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.筛查青少年和成年人丙型肝炎病毒感染:美国预防服务工作组建议声明。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 10;323(10):970-975. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1123.
5
Reducing Alert Burden in Electronic Health Records: State of the Art Recommendations from Four Health Systems.减少电子健康记录中的警报负担:四个医疗系统的最新建议。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Jan;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402715. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
6
Association of an Active Choice Intervention in the Electronic Health Record Directed to Medical Assistants With Clinician Ordering and Patient Completion of Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.医疗助理主动选择干预电子健康记录与临床医生下达医嘱和患者完成乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查测试之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915619. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15619.
7
Effect of Introducing a Default Order in the Electronic Medical Record on Unnecessary Daily Imaging During Palliative Radiotherapy for Adults With Cancer: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.在成人癌症姑息性放疗期间,电子病历中引入默认医嘱对不必要的每日影像学检查的影响:一项阶梯楔形整群随机临床试验
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;5(8):1220-1222. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1432.
8
Making Measurement Matter.让测量发挥作用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0843.
9
Hepatitis C Virus Screening Trends: Serial Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey Population, 2013-2015.丙型肝炎病毒筛查趋势:2013-2015 年全国健康访谈调查人群的连续横断面分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Apr;27(4):503-513. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0855. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
10
Nudge Units to Improve the Delivery of Health Care.推动单位以改善医疗保健服务。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):214-216. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1712984.