• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《COVID 阳性患者管理路径:墨尔本公共卫生机构、初级保健与都市医院的协作》

The COVID Positive Pathway: a collaboration between public health agencies, primary care, and metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne.

机构信息

The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.

The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2022 May 2;216(8):413-419. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51449. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

DOI:10.5694/mja2.51449
PMID:35301714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9115045/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the capacity of the COVID Positive Pathway, a collaborative model of care involving the Victorian public health unit, hospital services, primary care, community organisations, and the North Western Melbourne Primary Health Network, to support people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) isolating at home.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study of adults in northwest Melbourne with COVID-19, 3 August - 31 December 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic and clinical characteristics, and social and welfare needs of people cared for in the Pathway, by care tier level.

RESULTS

Of 1392 people referred to the Pathway by the public health unit, 858 were eligible for enrolment, and 711 consented to participation; 647 (91%) remained in the Pathway until they had recovered and isolation was no longer required. A total of 575 participants (81%) received care in primary care, mostly from their usual general practitioners; 155 people (22%) received care from hospital outreach services, and 64 (9%) needed high tier care (hospitalisation). Assistance with food and other basic supplies was required by 239 people in the Pathway (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID Positive Pathway is a feasible multidisciplinary, tiered model of care for people with COVID-19. About 80% of participants could be adequately supported by primary care and community organisations, allowing hospital services to be reserved for people with more severe illness or with risk factors for disease progression. The principles of this model could be applied to other health conditions if regulatory and funding barriers to information-sharing and care delivery by health care providers can be overcome.

摘要

目的

评估 COVID 阳性通道的能力,该通道是一个涉及维多利亚公共卫生部门、医院服务、初级保健、社区组织和西北墨尔本初级保健网络的协作式护理模式,以支持在家中隔离的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者。

设计、地点、参与者:2020 年 8 月 3 日至 12 月 31 日,对墨尔本西北部的 COVID-19 成年患者进行队列研究。

主要观察指标

通过护理层级,评估接受该通道护理的患者的人口统计学和临床特征以及社会和福利需求。

结果

公共卫生部门向该通道转介的 1392 人中,有 858 人符合纳入标准,有 711 人同意参与;有 647 人(91%)留在该通道,直到康复且不再需要隔离。共有 575 名参与者(81%)在初级保健机构接受护理,主要是来自其常规全科医生;155 人(22%)接受医院外展服务,64 人(9%)需要高级护理(住院治疗)。该通道中有 239 人(34%)需要食物和其他基本用品援助。

结论

COVID 阳性通道是一种可行的多学科、分层护理模式,适用于 COVID-19 患者。约 80%的参与者可以通过初级保健和社区组织得到充分支持,从而可以将医院服务保留给病情更严重或有疾病进展风险因素的患者。如果能够克服医疗服务提供者在信息共享和护理提供方面的监管和资金障碍,该模型的原则可以应用于其他健康状况。

相似文献

1
The COVID Positive Pathway: a collaboration between public health agencies, primary care, and metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne.《COVID 阳性患者管理路径:墨尔本公共卫生机构、初级保健与都市医院的协作》
Med J Aust. 2022 May 2;216(8):413-419. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51449. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
4
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
8
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
9
Primary care for the urban poor in India during the pandemic: Uninterrupted management of non-communicable diseases and home-based care of patients with COVID-19 infection.在疫情期间为印度城市贫困人口提供初级保健:持续管理非传染性疾病和对 COVID-19 感染患者进行居家护理。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1043597. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043597. eCollection 2022.
10
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital-at-home care in Singapore: A review of overseas protocols and guidelines to support implementation and policy redesign (systematic review).新加坡的居家医院护理:对支持实施和政策重新设计的海外协议及指南的综述(系统评价)
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0325662. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325662. eCollection 2025.
2
A Qualitative Exploration of COVID+ Learning Network Webinars: Healthcare Learnings at Pace in a State of Rapid Change.新冠疫情学习网络研讨会的定性探索:快速变化中的医疗保健学习步伐。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241295672. doi: 10.1177/21501319241295672.
3
Effectiveness of community-based oral antiviral treatments against severe COVID-19 outcomes in people 70 years and over in Victoria, Australia, 2022: an observational study.2022年澳大利亚维多利亚州70岁及以上人群中基于社区的口服抗病毒治疗对重症新冠病毒病结局的有效性:一项观察性研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Oct 3;41:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100917. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Exploring the advancements of Australian OPAT.探索澳大利亚门诊静脉抗生素治疗的进展。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 21;10:20499361231199582. doi: 10.1177/20499361231199582. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Rapid evidence review: Policy actions for the integration of public health and health care in the United States.快速证据审查:美国将公共卫生和医疗保健相结合的政策措施。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 29;11:1098431. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1098431. eCollection 2023.
6
Risk Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccination Among Childbearing Women.育龄妇女接种新冠疫苗的风险评估
Maedica (Bucur). 2022 Jun;17(2):449-457. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.449.

本文引用的文献

1
Navigating post-vaccine COVID-19 futures in the health and economic context.在健康与经济背景下探寻新冠疫苗接种后的未来走向。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):893-894. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00126-2. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Virtual Health Care for Community Management of Patients With COVID-19 in Australia: Observational Cohort Study.澳大利亚 COVID-19 患者社区管理中的虚拟医疗保健:观察性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 9;23(3):e21064. doi: 10.2196/21064.
3
A cross-country core strategy comparison in China, Japan, Singapore and South Korea during the early COVID-19 pandemic.中国、日本、新加坡和韩国在 COVID-19 大流行早期的跨境核心策略比较。
Global Health. 2021 Feb 22;17(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00672-w.
4
The moral responsibility of governments and individuals in the context of the coronavirus pandemic.冠状病毒大流行背景下政府和个人的道德责任。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Nov;49(7):815-820. doi: 10.1177/1403494821990250. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
A Virtual Ward Model of Care for Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Single-Center Clinical Study.COVID-19 患者虚拟病房护理模式:回顾性单中心临床研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 10;23(2):e25518. doi: 10.2196/25518.
6
Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health.Covid-19 大流行与健康的社会决定因素。
BMJ. 2021 Jan 28;372:n129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n129.
7
Insights From Rapid Deployment of a "Virtual Hospital" as Standard Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,作为标准护理的“虚拟医院”快速部署的见解。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Feb;174(2):192-199. doi: 10.7326/M20-4076. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
COVID-19: The need for an Australian economic pandemic response plan.新冠疫情:澳大利亚制定经济应对大流行计划的必要性。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):488-502. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Clinical presentation and management of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床表现和管理。
Med J Aust. 2020 Aug;213(3):134-139. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50698. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
COVID-19 kills at home: the close relationship between the epidemic and the increase of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.新冠病毒在家中夺命:疫情与院外心脏骤停的增加密切相关。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;41(32):3045-3054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa508.