Suppr超能文献

KRAS 野生型胰腺腺癌患者的分子特征。

Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan.

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jun 13;28(12):2704-2714. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3581.

Abstract

PURPOSE

KRAS mutation (MT) is a major oncogenic driver in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A small subset of PDACs harbor KRAS wild-type (WT). We aim to characterize the molecular profiles of KRAS WT PDAC to uncover new pathogenic drivers and offer targeted treatments.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor tissue obtained from surgical or biopsy material was subjected to next-generation DNA/RNA sequencing, microsatellite instability (MSI) and mismatch repair status determination.

RESULTS

Of the 2,483 patients (male 53.7%, median age 66 years) studied, 266 tumors (10.7%) were KRAS WT. The most frequently mutated gene in KRAS WT PDAC was TP53 (44.5%), followed by BRAF (13.0%). Multiple mutations within the DNA-damage repair (BRCA2, ATM, BAP1, RAD50, FANCE, PALB2), chromatin remodeling (ARID1A, PBRM1, ARID2, KMT2D, KMT2C, SMARCA4, SETD2), and cell-cycle control pathways (CDKN2A, CCND1, CCNE1) were detected frequently. There was no statistically significant difference in PD-L1 expression between KRAS WT (15.8%) and MT (17%) tumors. However, KRAS WT PDAC were more likely to be MSI-high (4.7% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.05), tumor mutational burden-high (4.5% vs. 1%; P < 0.05), and exhibit increased infiltration of CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid dendritic cells. KRAS WT PDACs exhibited gene fusions of BRAF (6.6%), FGFR2 (5.2%), ALK (2.6%), RET (1.3%), and NRG1 (1.3%), as well as amplification of FGF3 (3%), ERBB2 (2.2%), FGFR3 (1.8%), NTRK (1.8%), and MET (1.3%). Real-world evidence reveals a survival advantage of KRAS WT patients in overall cohorts as well as in patients treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or 5-FU/oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS WT PDAC represents 10.7% of PDAC and is enriched with targetable alterations, including immuno-oncologic markers. Identification of KRAS WT patients in clinical practice may expand therapeutic options in a clinically meaningful manner.

摘要

目的

KRAS 突变(MT)是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的主要致癌驱动因素。一小部分 PDAC 存在 KRAS 野生型(WT)。我们旨在描述 KRAS WT PDAC 的分子特征,以揭示新的发病驱动因素并提供靶向治疗。

实验设计

对来自手术或活检材料的肿瘤组织进行下一代 DNA/RNA 测序、微卫星不稳定性(MSI)和错配修复状态确定。

结果

在研究的 2483 名患者(男性占 53.7%,中位年龄 66 岁)中,266 个肿瘤(10.7%)为 KRAS WT。KRAS WT PDAC 中最常突变的基因是 TP53(44.5%),其次是 BRAF(13.0%)。在 DNA 损伤修复(BRCA2、ATM、BAP1、RAD50、FANCE、PALB2)、染色质重塑(ARID1A、PBRM1、ARID2、KMT2D、KMT2C、SMARCA4、SET2D)和细胞周期控制途径(CDKN2A、CCND1、CCNE1)中经常检测到多个基因突变。KRAS WT(15.8%)和 MT(17%)肿瘤之间 PD-L1 表达无统计学差异。然而,KRAS WT PDAC 更可能是 MSI-高(4.7%比 0.7%;P<0.05)、肿瘤突变负担高(4.5%比 1%;P<0.05),并且表现出 CD8+T 细胞、自然杀伤细胞和髓样树突状细胞的浸润增加。KRAS WT PDAC 存在 BRAF(6.6%)、FGFR2(5.2%)、ALK(2.6%)、RET(1.3%)和 NRG1(1.3%)的基因融合,以及 FGFR3(1.8%)、NTRK(1.8%)和 MET(1.3%)的扩增。真实世界的证据表明,KRAS WT 患者在总体队列以及接受吉西他滨/ nab-紫杉醇或 5-FU/奥沙利铂治疗的患者中均具有生存优势。

结论

KRAS WT PDAC 占 PDAC 的 10.7%,并富含可靶向的改变,包括免疫肿瘤标志物。在临床实践中识别 KRAS WT 患者可能会以有临床意义的方式扩大治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Molecular Characterization of KRAS Wild-type Tumors in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jun 13;28(12):2704-2714. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3581.
3
KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: molecular pathology and therapeutic opportunities.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 28;39(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01732-6.
4
5
Oncogenic Drivers and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in KRAS Wild-Type Pancreatic Cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 14;29(22):4627-4643. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-3930.
6
KRAS and BRAF gene mutations and DNA mismatch repair status in Chinese colorectal carcinoma patients.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 7;21(5):1595-605. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1595.
8
Molecular characterisation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with fusions and review of the literature.
J Clin Pathol. 2023 Mar;76(3):158-165. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207781. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcriptomic analysis on pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients uncovers KRAS-mediated PPAR pathway alteration.
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 11;15:1613773. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1613773. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating the Effect of Variants on Survival Outcomes and Therapy Response in Pancreatic Cancer.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Aug;9:e2400684. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00684. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
4
Treatment of KRAS-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer: New Hope for the Patients?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;17(15):2453. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152453.
6
Precision immune regulation in KRAS-mutated cancers: the final piece of the puzzle?
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2025 Jul 3;44(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13046-025-03444-1.
7

本文引用的文献

4
The Anti-HER3 mAb Seribantumab Effectively Inhibits Growth of Patient-Derived and Isogenic Cell Line and Xenograft Models with Oncogenic Fusions.
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jun 1;27(11):3154-3166. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3605. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
5
KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer.
Semin Oncol. 2021 Feb;48(1):10-18. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
KRAS drives immune evasion in a genetic model of pancreatic cancer.
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 5;12(1):1482. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21736-w.
7
An expanded universe of cancer targets.
Cell. 2021 Mar 4;184(5):1142-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.020.
8
Cancer Statistics, 2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: molecular pathology and therapeutic opportunities.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 28;39(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01732-6.
10
Prevalence of class I-III BRAF mutations among 114,662 cancer patients in a large genomic database.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 Jan;246(1):31-39. doi: 10.1177/1535370220959657. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验