• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包皮环切手术中的区域麻醉:二者孰优?

Regional Anesthesia in Circumcision Surgery: Which of the Two Things Is Better?

作者信息

Çömez Mehmet Selim, Aydın Pelin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Tayfur Ata Sökmen School of Medicine, Hatay, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Health Sciences University, Region Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Eurasian J Med. 2022 Feb;54(1):4-7. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20402.

DOI:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20402
PMID:35307620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9634892/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Postcircumcision pain in children can cause restlessness, crying and bleeding due to trauma. However, there are various methods to prevent postoperative pain, caudal and penile blocks are in the foreground. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CB and PB for the relief of postcircumcision pain. The secondary aim is to evaluate the postoperative additional analgesic requirement and side effects of these blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 148 children between the ages of 2 and 10 who underwent circumcision surgery were randomly assigned to two groups in terms of postoperative analgesia. 1) A group of caudal block (0,5 ml/kg %0.25 levobupivacaine) and 2) A group of penile block (0,3 ml/kg %0,25 levobupivacaine). Premedication and sedoanalgesia were standardized. The pain (FLACC Pain Score), analgesic consumption, motor block (Bromage Scale) and side effects (vomiting, hematoma, urinary retention) were assessed postoperatively for 4 hours.

RESULTS

Postoperative FLACC scores were lower for caudale block group in the 1st, 3rd and 4th hours. There was no significant difference in postoperative analgesic consumption between the groups. The most common postoperative side effect was vomiting in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Caudal block provided more effective analgesia than penile block in postcircumcision pain control.

摘要

目的

儿童包皮环切术后疼痛可因创伤导致烦躁、哭闹和出血。然而,有多种方法可预防术后疼痛,其中骶管阻滞和阴茎阻滞最为常用。本研究的主要目的是评估骶管阻滞(CB)和阴茎阻滞(PB)缓解包皮环切术后疼痛的有效性。次要目的是评估这些阻滞术后的额外镇痛需求和副作用。

材料与方法

总共148例年龄在2至10岁之间接受包皮环切手术的儿童,根据术后镇痛随机分为两组。1)骶管阻滞组(0.5 ml/kg 0.25%左旋布比卡因)和2)阴茎阻滞组(0.3 ml/kg 0.25%左旋布比卡因)。术前用药和镇静镇痛均标准化。术后4小时评估疼痛(FLACC疼痛评分)、镇痛药物消耗量、运动阻滞(布罗麻量表)和副作用(呕吐、血肿、尿潴留)。

结果

骶管阻滞组术后第1、3和4小时的FLACC评分较低。两组术后镇痛药物消耗量无显著差异。两组最常见的术后副作用均为呕吐。

结论

在包皮环切术后疼痛控制方面,骶管阻滞比阴茎阻滞提供更有效的镇痛。

相似文献

1
Regional Anesthesia in Circumcision Surgery: Which of the Two Things Is Better?包皮环切手术中的区域麻醉:二者孰优?
Eurasian J Med. 2022 Feb;54(1):4-7. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20402.
2
A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision.在包皮环切术中,比较低位硬膜外腔阻滞和超声引导下平面内技术阴茎背神经阻滞的术后镇痛效果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
Levobupivacaine for postoperative pain management in circumcision: caudal blocks or dorsal penile nerve block.左布比卡因用于包皮环切术后疼痛管理:骶管阻滞或阴茎背神经阻滞。
Agri. 2012;24(4):180-6. doi: 10.5505/agri.2012.21931.
4
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine for Circumcision in Children.布比卡因骶管阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞用于小儿包皮环切术的术后镇痛效果比较。
Korean J Pain. 2011 Mar;24(1):31-5. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.1.31. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
5
Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Muscle Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries.超声引导竖脊肌阻滞与超声引导骶管阻滞在小儿下腹部手术中的比较。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jul;25(4):E571-E580.
6
Dorsal penile nerve block for circumcision in pediatric patients: A prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial for the comparison of ultrasound-guided vs landmark technique.小儿包皮环切术中阴茎背神经阻滞:一项比较超声引导技术与体表定位技术的前瞻性、观察者盲法、随机对照临床试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Aug;28(8):703-709. doi: 10.1111/pan.13429. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
Prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison of the effects of caudally administered levobupivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% on pain and motor block in children undergoing circumcision surgery.前瞻性、随机、双盲比较 0.25%左旋布比卡因和 0.25%布比卡因用于小儿包皮环切术的镇痛和运动阻滞效果。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Dec;16(14):2014-20.
8
Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys.男孩包皮环切术后尾侧硬膜外阻滞与其他术后疼痛缓解方法的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003005.
9
Levobupivacaine caudal anesthesia in children: a randomized double-blind comparison with bupivacaine.小儿左布比卡因骶管麻醉:与布比卡因的随机双盲对照研究
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Jul;16(7):754-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01841.x.
10
Two different doses of caudal neostigmine co-administered with levobupivacaine produces analgesia in children.两种不同剂量的尾骶部新斯的明与左旋布比卡因联合使用可在儿童中产生镇痛效果。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 May;19(5):487-493. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.02969.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ring Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Circumcision Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial.包皮环切术后镇痛管理中骶部竖脊肌平面阻滞与环形阻滞的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照多中心试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 17;13(6):653. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060653.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision.在包皮环切术中,比较低位硬膜外腔阻滞和超声引导下平面内技术阴茎背神经阻滞的术后镇痛效果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block via Perineal Approach, an Alternative to a Caudal Block for Pediatric Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经会阴途径阴茎背神经阻滞:小儿包皮环切术替代骶管阻滞的一种方法:一项随机对照试验
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 27;2019:6875756. doi: 10.1155/2019/6875756. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcomes of Caudal vs Dorsal Penile Nerve Blocks for Outpatient Penile Surgeries.门诊阴茎手术中尾侧与背侧阴茎神经阻滞的术中及术后早期结果比较。
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.062. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
Comparison of preventive analgesia techniques in circumcision cases: Dorsal penile nerve block, caudal block, or subcutaneous morphine?包皮环切术预防性镇痛技术的比较:阴茎背神经阻滞、骶管阻滞还是皮下注射吗啡?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Feb;67(2):159-165.
5
Male circumcision.男性割礼。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
6
Comparing caudal and penile nerve blockade using bupivacaine in hypospadias repair surgeries in children.在小儿尿道下裂修复手术中比较使用布比卡因进行尾神经阻滞和阴茎神经阻滞的效果。
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2011 Sep-Dec;8(3):294-7. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.91673.
7
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine for Circumcision in Children.布比卡因骶管阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞用于小儿包皮环切术的术后镇痛效果比较。
Korean J Pain. 2011 Mar;24(1):31-5. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.1.31. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
8
Regional anaesthesia and analgesia in the neonate.新生儿的区域麻醉与镇痛。
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;24(3):309-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.02.012.
9
Penile block in children, our first experience.
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2006;107(8):320-2.
10
Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update.小儿骶管麻醉:最新进展
Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):453-9.