• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布比卡因骶管阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞用于小儿包皮环切术的术后镇痛效果比较。

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine for Circumcision in Children.

机构信息

Departmant of Anesthesia and Reanimation, Sevgi Women's and Children's Hospital, Ordu, Turkey.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2011 Mar;24(1):31-5. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.1.31. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

DOI:10.3344/kjp.2011.24.1.31
PMID:21390176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3049974/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Circumcision is a painful intervention frequently performed in pediatric surgery. We aim to compare the efficacy of caudal block versus dorsal penile block (DPNB) under general anesthesia for children undergoing circumcision.

METHODS

This study was performed between July 1, 2009 and October 16, 2009. Fifty male children American Society of Anesthesiolgists physical status classification I, aged between 3 and 12 were included in this randomized, prospective, comparative study. Anesthetic techniques were standardized for all children. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Using 0.25% 0.5 ml/kg levobupivacain, we performed DPNB for Group 1 and caudal block for Group 2. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated for six hours with the Flacc Pain Scale for five categories; (F) Face, (L) Legs, (A) Activity, (C) Cry, and (C) Consolability. For every child, supplemental analgesic amounts, times, and probable local or systemic complications were recorded.

RESULTS

No significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05) was found in mean age, body weight, anesthesia duration, FLACC pain, and sedation scores (P > 0.05). However, on subsequent measurements, a significant decrease of pain and sedation scores was noted in both the DPNB group and the caudal block group (P < 0.001). No major complication was found when using either technique.

CONCLUSIONS

DPNB and caudal block provided similar postoperative analgesic effects without major complications for children under general anesthesia.

摘要

背景

包皮环切术是小儿外科中一种常见的有创操作。本研究旨在比较全身麻醉下骶管阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞(DPNB)用于小儿包皮环切术的效果。

方法

本研究于 2009 年 7 月 1 日至 2009 年 10 月 16 日进行。选择 ASA 分级Ⅰ级的 50 例行包皮环切术的男性患儿,年龄 3~12 岁,采用随机、前瞻性、对照研究。所有患儿均采用标准化的麻醉技术。患儿随机分为 2 组,1 组行 DPNB(0.25%0.5 ml/kg 左旋布比卡因),2 组行骶管阻滞。术后 6 小时采用 Flacc 疼痛评分法(5 个等级:F 面部、L 腿部、A 活动、C 哭闹、C 安慰)评估术后镇痛效果。记录每个患儿的追加镇痛药物的剂量、次数以及可能出现的局部或全身并发症。

结果

2 组患儿的年龄、体质量、麻醉时间、FLACC 疼痛评分和镇静评分无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。然而,在随后的测量中,DPNB 组和骶管阻滞组的疼痛和镇静评分均显著下降(P < 0.001)。2 种技术均未出现严重并发症。

结论

全身麻醉下,DPNB 和骶管阻滞均能提供相似的术后镇痛效果,且无严重并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/3049974/358c4084a949/kjpain-24-31-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/3049974/96b032439975/kjpain-24-31-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/3049974/358c4084a949/kjpain-24-31-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/3049974/96b032439975/kjpain-24-31-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4ae/3049974/358c4084a949/kjpain-24-31-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block with Levobupivacaine for Circumcision in Children.布比卡因骶管阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞用于小儿包皮环切术的术后镇痛效果比较。
Korean J Pain. 2011 Mar;24(1):31-5. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2011.24.1.31. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
2
A comparison of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of low dose caudal epidural block and US-guided dorsal penile nerve block with in-plane technique in circumcision.在包皮环切术中,比较低位硬膜外腔阻滞和超声引导下平面内技术阴茎背神经阻滞的术后镇痛效果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
Dorsal Penile Nerve Block via Perineal Approach, an Alternative to a Caudal Block for Pediatric Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经会阴途径阴茎背神经阻滞:小儿包皮环切术替代骶管阻滞的一种方法:一项随机对照试验
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 27;2019:6875756. doi: 10.1155/2019/6875756. eCollection 2019.
4
Levobupivacaine for postoperative pain management in circumcision: caudal blocks or dorsal penile nerve block.左布比卡因用于包皮环切术后疼痛管理:骶管阻滞或阴茎背神经阻滞。
Agri. 2012;24(4):180-6. doi: 10.5505/agri.2012.21931.
5
Comparison of the effects of ring block and dorsal penile nerve block on parental satisfaction for circumcision operation in children: randomized controlled trial.环扎阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞对儿童包皮环切术父母满意度影响的比较:随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Apr 8;40(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05681-5.
6
Low-dose caudal versus dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative analgesia after circumcision: a randomized comparative study.低剂量骶尾部阴茎神经阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞用于包皮环切术后镇痛的随机对照研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(4):297-303. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.132869.
7
Caudal epidural block versus ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block for pediatric distal hypospadias surgery: A prospective, observational study.尾侧硬膜外阻滞与超声引导下阴茎背神经阻滞用于小儿远端尿道下裂手术:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug;16(4):438.e1-438.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spina Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Pediatric Circumcision: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.小儿包皮环切术后骶尾部阻滞与骶棘肌阻滞的术后镇痛效果比较:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Urol Int. 2024;108(4):292-297. doi: 10.1159/000538323. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
9
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block with ultrasound-guided penile nerve block for analgesia during pediatric circumcision.随机对照试验(RCT)比较了超声引导阴部神经阻滞与超声引导阴茎神经阻滞在小儿包皮环切术中的镇痛效果。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Mar;48(3):127-133. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103785. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve block vs neurostimulator-guided pudendal nerve block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.超声引导下阴茎背神经阻滞与神经刺激器引导下阴部神经阻滞用于小儿尿道下裂手术的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Oct;29(10):1046-1052. doi: 10.1111/pan.13727. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of the Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Block and Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Epidural Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.超声引导下阴茎背侧阻滞与超声引导下骶管硬膜外阻滞用于小儿尿道下裂手术术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照研究
Cureus. 2025 Apr 16;17(4):e82351. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82351. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Low-dose caudal versus dorsal penile nerve block for postoperative analgesia after circumcision: a randomized comparative study.低剂量骶尾部阴茎神经阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞用于包皮环切术后镇痛的随机对照研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(4):297-303. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.132869.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children?超声引导是否能提高儿童阴茎背神经阻滞的疗效?
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Oct;20(10):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03405.x.
2
A retrospective audit of three different regional anaesthetic techniques for circumcision in children.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):519-24. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800317.
3
Levobupivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and pain management.左旋布比卡因:在局部麻醉和疼痛管理中的应用综述。
Regional Anesthesia in Circumcision Surgery: Which of the Two Things Is Better?
包皮环切手术中的区域麻醉:二者孰优?
Eurasian J Med. 2022 Feb;54(1):4-7. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.20402.
4
A randomized-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of caudal midazolam, ketamine and neostigmine as adjuvants to bupivacaine on postoperative analgesic in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery.一项随机对照双盲研究,旨在评估氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和新斯的明作为布比卡因辅助剂对下腹部手术患儿术后镇痛的效果。
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jan 15;89(4):513-518. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i4.5775.
5
Comparison of caudal tramadol versus caudal fentanyl with bupivacaine for prolongation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients.小儿患者中尾椎注射曲马多与尾椎注射芬太尼联合布比卡因用于延长术后镇痛效果的比较。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):154-60. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.168807.
6
Predictive Factors of Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Elective Circumcision: A Prospective Cohort Study.择期包皮环切术患儿术后疼痛和术后焦虑的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究
Korean J Pain. 2015 Oct;28(4):244-53. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.4.244. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
7
Morphologic diversities of sacral canal in children; three-dimensional computed tomographic study.儿童骶管的形态学多样性;三维 CT 研究。
Korean J Pain. 2014 Jul;27(3):253-9. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.3.253. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
8
Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study.在接受三种不同包皮环切手术技术的儿童中,0.25%左旋布比卡因联合对乙酰氨基酚环形阻滞与单独使用对乙酰氨基酚的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):45-50. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.125936.
Drugs. 2010 Apr 16;70(6):761-91. doi: 10.2165/11203250-000000000-00000.
4
Pediatric regional anesthesia.儿科区域麻醉。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Oct;75(10):577-83.
5
Penile block is associated with less urinary retention than caudal anesthesia in distal hypospadia repair in children.阴茎阻滞与尾部麻醉相比,可减少儿童远端尿道下裂修复术后的尿潴留。
World J Urol. 2010 Feb;28(1):87-91. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0420-2. Epub 2009 May 23.
6
Caudal epidural block versus other methods of postoperative pain relief for circumcision in boys.男孩包皮环切术后尾侧硬膜外阻滞与其他术后疼痛缓解方法的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003005.pub2.
7
A comparison of caudal bupivacaine and ketamine with penile block for paediatric circumcision.小儿包皮环切术中尾骶部布比卡因和氯胺酮与阴茎阻滞的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;25(12):1009-13. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004833. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
8
A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.认知障碍儿童疼痛评估工具的临床效用比较。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):72-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287680.21212.d0.
9
Penile block in children, our first experience.
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2006;107(8):320-2.
10
Levobupivacaine caudal anesthesia in children: a randomized double-blind comparison with bupivacaine.小儿左布比卡因骶管麻醉:与布比卡因的随机双盲对照研究
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Jul;16(7):754-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01841.x.