Suppr超能文献

主动脉球囊阻断复苏术(REBOA)在创伤性腹部和骨盆出血中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in traumatic abdominal and pelvic exsanguination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

General Surgery Unit, ASST Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano, 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy.

University of Pavia, Corso Str. Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3561-3574. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01955-6. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) represents a minimally invasive technique of aortic occlusion (AO). It has been demonstrated to be safe and effective with appropriate training in traumatic hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability; however, its indications are still debated. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the impact of REBOA on mortality in torso trauma patient with severe non-compressible hemorrhage compared to other temporizing hemostatic techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

The primary outcome is represented by 24-h, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are post-procedural hemodynamic improvement (systolic blood pressure-SBP), mean injury severity score (ISS) differences, treatment-related morbidity, transfusional requirements and identification of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A significant survival benefit at 24 h (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27-0.79; I: 55%; p = 0.005) was highlighted in patients undergoing REBOA. Regarding in-hospital mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.75-1.32; I: 73%; p = 0.98) no differences in risk of death were noticed. A hemodynamic improvement-although not significant-was highlighted, with 55.8 mmHg post-AO SBP mean difference between REBOA and control groups. A significantly lower mean number of packed Red Blood Cells (pRBCs) was noticed for REBOA patients (mean difference: - 3.02; 95% CI - 5.79 to - 0.25; p = 0.033). Nevertheless, an increased risk of post-procedural complications (RR 1.66; 95% CI 0.39-7.14; p = 0.496) was noticed in the REBOA group.

CONCLUSIONS

REBOA may represent a valid tool in the initial treatment of multiple sites subdiaphragmatic hemorrhage with refractory hemodynamic instability. However, due to several important limitations of the present study, our findings should be interpreted with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III according to ELIS (SR/MA with up to two negative criteria).

摘要

目的

主动脉球囊阻断复苏术(REBOA)是一种微创的主动脉阻断(AO)技术。在伴有血流动力学不稳定的创伤性出血中,经过适当的培训,其安全性和有效性已得到证实;然而,其适应证仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估与其他临时性止血技术相比,REBOA 对伴有严重非可压缩性出血的躯干创伤患者死亡率的影响。

研究设计

主要结局为 24 小时和住院死亡率。次要结局为术后血流动力学改善(收缩压-SBP)、平均损伤严重程度评分(ISS)差异、治疗相关发病率、输血需求和预后因素的识别。

结果

接受 REBOA 的患者在 24 小时时具有显著的生存获益(RR 0.46;95%CI 0.27-0.79;I:55%;p=0.005)。关于住院死亡率(RR 0.99;95%CI 0.75-1.32;I:73%;p=0.98),死亡风险无差异。尽管没有显著意义,但强调了血流动力学的改善,AO 后 REBOA 组和对照组的 SBP 平均差值为 55.8mmHg。REBOA 患者的平均红细胞压积(pRBC)输注量显著减少(平均差值:-3.02;95%CI -5.79 至 -0.25;p=0.033)。然而,REBOA 组术后并发症的风险增加(RR 1.66;95%CI 0.39-7.14;p=0.496)。

结论

REBOA 可能是治疗多个部位下腹部出血伴难治性血流动力学不稳定的有效工具。然而,由于本研究的几个重要局限性,我们的研究结果应谨慎解释。

证据水平

根据 ELIS(SR/MA 最多有两个阴性标准)为三级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验