Suppr超能文献

评估主动脉内复苏球囊阻断术对钝性创伤合并失血性休克及并存创伤性脑损伤患者的临床影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Evaluating the clinical impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in patients with blunt trauma with hemorrhagic shock and coexisting traumatic brain injuries: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Hsu Chih-Po, Liao Chien-An, Wang Chia-Cheng, Huang Jen-Fu, Cheng Chi-Tung, Chen Szu-An, Tee Yu-San, Kuo Ling-Wei, Ou Yang Chun-Hsiang, Liao Chien-Hung, Fu Chih-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center.

Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6676-6683. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001823.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) on traumatic brain injuries remains uncertain, with potential outcomes ranging from neuroprotection to exacerbation of the injury. The study aimed to evaluate consciousness recovery in patients with blunt trauma, shock, and traumatic brain injuries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2017 to 2019. During the study period, 3 138 896 trauma registries were examined, and 16 016 adult patients with blunt trauma, shock, and traumatic brain injuries were included. Among these, 176 (1.1%) underwent REBOA. Comparisons were conducted between patients with and without REBOA after implementing 1:3 propensity score matching to mitigate disparities. The primary outcome was the highest Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score during admission. The secondary outcomes encompassed the volume of blood transfusion, the necessity for hemostatic interventions and therapeutic neurosurgery, and the mortality rate.

RESULTS

Through well-balanced propensity score matching, a notable difference in mortality rate was observed, with 59.7% in the REBOA group and 48.7% in the non-REBOA group ( P =0.015). In the REBOA group, the median 4 h red blood cell transfusion was significantly higher (2800 ml [1500-4908] vs. 1300 ml [600-2500], P <0.001). The REBOA group required lesser hemorrhagic control surgeries (31.8 vs. 47.7%, P <0.001). The incidence of therapeutic neurosurgery was 5.1% in the REBOA group and 8.7% in the non-REBOA group ( P =0.168). Among survivors in the REBOA group, the median highest GCS score during admission was significantly greater for both total (11 [8-14] vs. 9 [6-14], P =0.036) and motor components (6 [4-6] vs. 5 [4-6], P =0.037). The highest GCS score among the survivors with predominant pelvic injuries was not different between the two groups (11 [8-13] vs. 11 [7-14], P =0.750).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experiencing shock and traumatic brain injury have high mortality rates, necessitating swift resuscitation and prompt hemorrhagic control. The use of REBOA as an adjunct for bridging definitive hemorrhagic control may correlate with enhanced consciousness recovery.

摘要

背景

主动脉内复苏球囊阻断术(REBOA)对创伤性脑损伤的影响尚不确定,其潜在结果可能从神经保护到损伤加重。本研究旨在评估钝性创伤、休克和创伤性脑损伤患者的意识恢复情况。

材料与方法

数据来自美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进项目2017年至2019年的数据。在研究期间,检查了3138896例创伤登记病例,纳入了16016例成年钝性创伤、休克和创伤性脑损伤患者。其中,176例(1.1%)接受了REBOA。在实施1:3倾向评分匹配以减少差异后,对接受和未接受REBOA的患者进行了比较。主要结局是入院期间最高格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分。次要结局包括输血量、止血干预和治疗性神经外科手术的必要性以及死亡率。

结果

通过平衡良好的倾向评分匹配,观察到死亡率有显著差异,REBOA组为59.7%,非REBOA组为48.7%(P = 0.015)。在REBOA组,4小时内红细胞输注中位数显著更高(2800 ml [1500 - 4908] 对比 1300 ml [600 - 2500],P < 0.001)。REBOA组需要的出血控制手术较少(31.8%对比47.7%,P < 0.001)。治疗性神经外科手术的发生率在REBOA组为5.1%,在非REBOA组为8.7%(P = 0.168)。在REBOA组的幸存者中,入院期间最高GCS总分中位数(11 [8 - 14] 对比 9 [6 - 14],P = 0.036)和运动部分中位数(6 [4 - 6] 对比 5 [4 - 6],P = 0.037)均显著更高。主要为骨盆损伤的幸存者中,两组的最高GCS评分无差异(11 [8 - 13] 对比 11 [7 - 14],P = 0.750)。

结论

遭受休克和创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率高,需要迅速复苏和及时控制出血。使用REBOA作为确定性出血控制的辅助手段可能与意识恢复增强相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e79e/11486937/47b6621570bb/js9-110-6676-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验