• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康与可持续的食品购物:意图与动机调查

Healthy and Sustainable Food Shopping: A Survey of Intentions and Motivations.

作者信息

Blanke Julia, Billieux Joël, Vögele Claus

机构信息

Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

People Behaviour & Technology Integration Research Group, Munster Technological University, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Mar 2;9:742614. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.742614. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.742614
PMID:35308289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8924458/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between sustainable and healthy food shopping behavior comparing general motivation with the immediate intention to act.

METHOD

We conducted an online survey of 144 staff at the Cork Institute of Technology, Ireland, using a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Self-Determination Theory to compute the Behavioral Intention score and the Relative Autonomy Index in relation to healthy and sustainable grocery shopping.

RESULTS

The intention to shop healthy food was higher ( < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.56) than the intention to shop in a sustainable way. A significant intention-action gap was observed for both healthy ( < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.97) and sustainable grocery shopping ( < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.78). While there was a significant correlation ( < 0.001) between the longer-term motivations to act in a healthy and sustainable way, this association was not significant ( = 0.16) for the more short-term Behavioral Intention scores.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Health was identified as a more important driver for dietary behavior compared to sustainability. While longer-term motivation shows a stronger correlation between healthy and sustainable grocery shopping, short-term intentions do not follow this pattern as strongly. A significant intention-action gap exists for both, which is stronger for sustainability than for health.

摘要

目的

通过比较一般动机与即刻行动意图,确定可持续和健康食品购物行为之间的关系。

方法

我们对爱尔兰科克理工学院的144名员工进行了一项在线调查,使用基于计划行为理论和自我决定理论的问卷来计算与健康和可持续食品杂货购物相关的行为意图得分和相对自主指数。

结果

购买健康食品的意图高于以可持续方式购物的意图(<0.001,科恩d值=0.56)。在健康食品(<0.001,科恩d值=0.97)和可持续食品杂货购物(<0.001,科恩d值=1.78)方面均观察到显著的意图-行动差距。虽然以健康和可持续方式行动的长期动机之间存在显著相关性(<0.001),但这种关联在更短期的行为意图得分方面并不显著(=0.16)。

结论与启示

与可持续性相比,健康被确定为饮食行为的更重要驱动因素。虽然长期动机在健康和可持续食品杂货购物之间显示出更强的相关性,但短期意图并没有如此强烈地遵循这种模式。两者都存在显著的意图-行动差距,其中可持续性方面的差距比健康方面的更强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71c/8924458/f067ac5d6c9d/fnut-09-742614-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71c/8924458/521ba550b31e/fnut-09-742614-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71c/8924458/f067ac5d6c9d/fnut-09-742614-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71c/8924458/521ba550b31e/fnut-09-742614-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d71c/8924458/f067ac5d6c9d/fnut-09-742614-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthy and Sustainable Food Shopping: A Survey of Intentions and Motivations.健康与可持续的食品购物:意图与动机调查
Front Nutr. 2022 Mar 2;9:742614. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.742614. eCollection 2022.
2
Nutritional Status, Intentions and Motivations towards Adopting a Planetary Health Diet-A Cross-Sectional Study.营养状况、采用星球健康饮食的意图和动机——一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 13;15(24):5102. doi: 10.3390/nu15245102.
3
Factors Affecting E-Shopping Behaviour: Application of Theory of Planned Behaviour.影响电子购物行为的因素:计划行为理论的应用。
Behav Neurol. 2021 Nov 23;2021:1664377. doi: 10.1155/2021/1664377. eCollection 2021.
4
Exploring the influences of personal attitudes on the intention of continuing online grocery shopping after the COVID-19 pandemic.探究个人态度对新冠疫情后继续进行线上食品杂货购物意愿的影响。
Travel Behav Soc. 2023 Oct;33:100622. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100622. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
5
Estimating Dietary Intake from Grocery Shopping Data-A Comparative Validation of Relevant Indicators in Switzerland.从杂货店购物数据估计膳食摄入量——瑞士相关指标的比较验证。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 29;14(1):159. doi: 10.3390/nu14010159.
6
Using health primes to reduce unhealthy snack purchases among overweight consumers in a grocery store.利用健康诱因减少杂货店超重消费者购买不健康零食。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Apr;38(4):597-602. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.136. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
7
From single-use to multi-use: Study of consumers' behavior toward consumption of reusable containers.从一次性到多用途:消费者对可重复使用容器消费行为的研究。
J Environ Manage. 2017 May 15;193:334-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.060. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
The influence of ethical values and food choice motivations on intentions to purchase sustainably sourced foods.伦理价值观和食品选择动机对购买可持续食品意向的影响。
Appetite. 2013 Oct;69:137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.05.024. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
9
Food healthiness versus tastiness: Contrasting their impact on more and less successful healthy shoppers within a virtual food shopping task.食品健康与美味:在虚拟购物任务中对比它们对更成功和不太成功的健康购物者的影响。
Appetite. 2019 Feb 1;133:405-413. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
10
Investigation of online grocery shopping and delivery preference before, during, and after COVID-19.COVID-19疫情之前、期间及之后的线上食品杂货购物及配送偏好调查。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022 Jun;14:100580. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100580. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Does knowledge and concern regarding food supplement safety affect the behavioral intention of consumers? An experimental study on the theory of reasoned action.对食品补充剂安全性的了解和关注会影响消费者的行为意图吗?基于理性行动理论的一项实验研究。
Front Nutr. 2024 Jan 8;10:1305964. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1305964. eCollection 2023.
2
Nutritional Status, Intentions and Motivations towards Adopting a Planetary Health Diet-A Cross-Sectional Study.营养状况、采用星球健康饮食的意图和动机——一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 13;15(24):5102. doi: 10.3390/nu15245102.
3
Effect of perception of sustainability in local food experiences on healthy eating tendency: mediator and moderator effects.

本文引用的文献

1
EU quality label vs organic food products: A multigroup structural equation modeling to assess consumers' intention to buy in light of sustainable motives.欧盟质量标签与有机食品产品:基于可持续动机评估消费者购买意愿的多群组结构方程建模。
Food Res Int. 2021 Jan;139:109846. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109846. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health.基于自我决定理论的健康领域干预研究的元分析:对动机、健康行为、生理和心理健康的影响。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Jun;15(2):214-244. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
当地食物体验中的可持续性认知对健康饮食倾向的影响:中介效应和调节效应
Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 7;10:1150277. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1150277. eCollection 2023.
Modelling the health co-benefits of sustainable diets in the UK, France, Finland, Italy and Sweden.
在英国、法国、芬兰、意大利和瑞典建立可持续饮食的健康协同效益模型。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019 Apr;73(4):624-633. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0401-5. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
4
Perspective: Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Europe-Scientific Concepts, Current Status, and Perspectives.观点:欧洲的基于食物的膳食指南——科学概念、现状和展望。
Adv Nutr. 2018 Sep 1;9(5):544-560. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy033.
5
Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review.健康饮食模式与环境可持续性的一致性:一项系统综述。
Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):1005-1025. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012567. Print 2016 Nov.
6
Operationalising the health aspects of sustainable diets: a review.实现可持续饮食的健康方面:一项综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(4):739-757. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002664. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
7
Shrinking the food-print: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours.缩小食物足迹:一项关于消费者对健康和环保食品行为的认知、体验及态度的定性研究。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:117-131. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
8
A Consensus Proposal for Nutritional Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of a Healthy Diet: The Mediterranean Diet as a Case Study.用于评估健康饮食可持续性的营养指标共识提案:以地中海饮食为例。
Front Nutr. 2016 Aug 29;3:37. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2016.00037. eCollection 2016.
9
A Systematic Review of the Measurement of Sustainable Diets.可持续饮食衡量的系统评价
Adv Nutr. 2016 Jul 15;7(4):641-64. doi: 10.3945/an.115.011015. Print 2016 Jul.
10
Achieving dietary recommendations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions: modelling diets to minimise the change from current intakes.实现饮食建议并减少温室气体排放:对饮食进行建模以尽量减少与当前摄入量的差异。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Apr 7;13:46. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0370-1.