Perotte Rimma, Hajicharalambous Christina, Sugalski Gregory, Underwood Joseph P
Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:969-978. eCollection 2021.
The problem of clinical documentation burden is ever-growing. Electronic documentation tools such as "dotphrases" were invented to help with the documentation burden. Despite the ubiquity of these tools, they are understudied. We present work on the usage of dotphrases within the emergency department. We find that dotphrases are most often used by medical scribes, they significantly increase note length, and are completely unstandardized as to their naming conventions, content, and usage. We find that there is inconsistent usage across and within providers and that there is much duplication in the dotphrase content. We also show that dotphrases have no effect on the time to complete and cosign a note. Finally, we demonstrate that even when accounting for patient complexity upon presentation, note authorship, and note length - notes with higher dotphrase usage are billed at higher billing levels.
临床文档负担问题日益严重。诸如“点短语”之类的电子文档工具应运而生,以减轻文档负担。尽管这些工具随处可见,但对它们的研究却很少。我们展示了在急诊科使用点短语的相关工作。我们发现,点短语最常被医疗抄写员使用,它们显著增加了病历长度,并且在命名惯例、内容和用法方面完全没有标准化。我们发现,不同提供者之间以及提供者内部的使用情况不一致,点短语内容存在大量重复。我们还表明,点短语对完成并签署一份病历的时间没有影响。最后,我们证明,即使考虑到患者就诊时的复杂程度、病历作者和病历长度,使用点短语较多的病历计费水平更高。